Though there are many existing measures of state capacity, few capture its sub-national territorial variation in a reliable and valid way. This article proposes a novel, survey-based, measurement strategy for state capacity that is tailored to address this limitation of existing measures, and apply it to contemporary Latin America. We describe cross-national variation in state capacity based on data produced by our measure, engage in a series of validation exercises to show that it taps this concept rather than related elements of the political context, and map variation in sub-national stateness in Latin America. The article closes with an agenda for future research applying our measurement strategy to assess sub-national variation in stateness, in Latin America and beyond.
AdcockR.CollierD. (2001). Measurement validity: A shared standard for qualitative and quantitative research. American Political Science Review, 95, 529-546.
2.
DargentE.FeldmannA.LunaJ. P. (2017). Greater state capacity, lesser stateness: Lessons from the Peruvian commodity boom. Politics & Society, 45, 3-34.
3.
Durán MartínezA.SoiferH. D. (2016, September1). Opening the black box of the Upper Huallaga Valley: Drugs, insurgency, and violence in Peru 1980-2000. Paper presented at American Political Science Association’s Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA.
4.
FearonJ.LaitinD. (2003). Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War. American Political Science Review, 97-1, 75-90.
5.
FukuyamaF. (2013). What is governance?Governance, 26, 347-368.
6.
GiraudyA. (2012). Conceptualizing state strength: Moving beyond strong and weak states. Revista de Ciencia, 32, 599-612.
7.
GiraudyA.LunaJ. P. (2017). Unpacking the state’s uneven territorial reach: Evidence from Latin America. In CentenoM. A.KohliA.YasharD. J. (Eds.), States in the developing world (pp. 93-120). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
8.
HansonJ.SigmanR. (2013). Leviathan’s latent dimensions: Measuring state capacity for comparative political research. Unpublished manuscript, Maxwell School, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY.
9.
HarbersI. (2015). Taxation and the unequal reach of the state: Mapping state capacity in Ecuador. Governance, 28, 373-391.
10.
HerbstJ. (2000) States and Power in Africa. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
HerreraY. M.KapurD. (2007). Improving data quality: Actors, incentives, and capabilities. Political Analysis, 15, 365-386.
12.
HuntingtonH.WibbelsE. (2014). The geography of governance in Africa: New tools from satellites, surveys, and mapping initiatives. Regional and Federal Studies, 24, 625-645.
13.
JervenM. (2013). Poor numbers: How we are misled by African development statistics and what to do about it. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
14.
KalyvasS. (2006). The Logic of Violence in Civil War. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
15.
KurtzM. (2013). Latin American State Building in Comparative Perspective: Social Foundations of Institutional Order. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
16.
KurtzM.SchrankA. (2007). Growth and governance: Models, measures, and mechanisms. Journal of Politics, 69, 538-554.
17.
LeeM. M.ZhangN. (2017). Legibility and the informational foundations of state capacity. Journal of Politics, 79, 118-132.
LunaJ. P.ToroS. (2014). State capacity and democratic governance in Latin America: A survey data-based approach to measurement and assessment. AmericasBarometer Insights. Retrieved from http: http://www.vanderbilt.edu/lapop/insights/IO902en_v2.pdf
20.
MannM. (1984). The autonomous power of the state: its origins, mechanisms, and results. European Journal of Sociology, 25, 185-213.
21.
McClendonG. (2016). Race and responsiveness: A field experiment with South African politicians. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 3, 60-74.
22.
O’DonnellG. (1993). On the state, democratization, and some conceptual problems: A Latin American view with glances at some postcommunist countries. World Development, 21-8, 1355-1369.
23.
RueschemeyerD. (2005). Building States: Inherently a long-term process? An Argument from theory. In: LangeM.RueschemeyerD. (Eds.) States and Development (pp. 143-164). London, England: Palgrave MacMillan.
24.
SaylorR. (2013). Concepts, measures, and measuring well: An alternative outlook. Sociological Methods & Research, 42, 354-391.
25.
SlaterD. (2010). Ordering power: Contentious politics and authoritarian Leviathans in Southeast Asia. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
26.
SoiferH. D. (2008). State Infrastructural Power: Conceptualization and Measurement in Empirical Analysis. Studies in Comparative International Development, 43, 231-251.
27.
SoiferH. D. (2012). Measuring state capacity in contemporary Latin America. Revista de Ciencia Política, 32, 585-598.
28.
SoiferH. D. (2013). State Power and the Redistributive Threat. Studies in Comparative International Development, 48, 1-22.
29.
SoiferH. D. (2015). State building in Latin America. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
30.
SoiferH. D.Vom HauM. (2008). Unpacking the Strength of the State: The Utility of State Infrastructural Power. Studies in Comparative International Development, 43, 219-230.
31.
SoiferH. D.VieiraE. A.III. (n.d.). The Sendero Luminoso conflict and state coercive capacity in post-conflict Peru. Unpublished manuscript, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
32.
United Nations Development Programme. (2009). Indice del densidad del estado. New York, NY: Author.
33.
WilkinsonS. (2006). Votes and violence: Electoral competition and ethnic riots in India. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
34.
YasharD. (2005). Constructing citizenship in Latin America: Indigenous movements and the rise of the post-liberal challenge. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
