Using a national sample of first-time voters (N = 1,465), this online survey investigated relationship theory in political public relations. Looking at one’s relationship with both major U.S. political parties during the 2016 U.S. presidential election, this study seeks to determine the level of relationship and variables that might predict it. Results indicate that these first-time voters had moderate-to-low relationships with the parties. Even so, relationship with one’s party is predicted by authenticity of your party’s candidate and the level of credibility you assign your party.
KimJ. Y.KiousisS.MolledaJ.-C. (2015). Use of affect in blog communication: Trust, credibility, and authenticity. Public Relations Review, 41, 504-507.
3.
LedinghamJ. A. (2001). Government-community relationships: Extending the relation theory of public relations. Public Relations Review, 27, 285-295.
4.
LedinghamJ. A.BruningS. D.WilsonL. J. (1999). Time as an indicator of the perceptions and behavior of members of a key public: Monitoring and predicting organization-public relationships. Journal of Public Relations Research, 11, 167-183.
5.
LeeJ.LimY-S. (2016). Gendered campaign tweets: The cases of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. Public Relations Review, 42, 849-855.
LoudenA.McCauliffM. (2004). The “authentic candidate”: Extending candidate image assessments. In HackerK. L. (Ed.), Presidential candidate image (pp. 85-102). New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
8.
MenL.R.TsaiW-H. S. (2014). Perceptual, attitudinal, and behavioral Outcomes of organization–public engagement on corporate social networking sites. Journal of Public Relations Reesarch, 26, 417-435.
9.
MolledaJ. C. (2010). Authenticity and the construct’s dimensions in public relations and communication research. Journal of Communication Management, 14, 223-236.
RawlinsB. (2009). Give the emperor a mirror: Toward developing a stakeholder measurement of organizational transparency. Journal of Public Relations Research, 21, 71-99.
12.
SeltzerT.ZhangW. (2011). Toward a model of political organization–public relationships: Antecedent and cultivation strategy influence on citizens’ relationships with political parties. Journal of Public Relations Research, 23, 24-45.
13.
SeltzerT.ZhangW.GearhartS.ConduffL. (2013). Sources of citizens’ experiential and reputational relationships with political parties. Public Relations Journal, 7(4), 1-35.
14.
ShenH.KimJ.-N. (2012). The authentic enterprise: Another buzz word, or a true driver of quality relationships?Journal of Public Relations Research, 24, 371-389.
15.
StrömbäckJ.KiousisS. (2011). Political public relations: Principles and applications. New York, NY: Routledge.
16.
SweetserK. D. (2015). Exploring the political organization-public relationship in terms of relationship, personality, loyalty, and outcomes among first-time voters. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 9, 217-234.
17.
SweetserK. D.EnglishK.FernandesJ. (2015). Super PACs and strong relationships: The impact of digital interaction on the political organization-public relationship. Journal of Public Relations Research, 27, 101-117.
18.
SweetserK. D.KelleherT. (2016). Communicated commitment and conversational voice: An abbreviated measure of communicative strategies for maintaining organization–public relationships. Journal of Public Relations Research, 28, 217-231.
19.
SweetserK. D.TedescoJ. C. (2014). Effects of exposure and messaging on political organization-public relationships exemplified in the candidate–constituent relationship. American Behavioral Scientist, 58, 776-793.
