Job Authority and Support for Income Redistributive Policy

Abstract

Building on substantive yet neglected foundations provided by classical sociological theorists—theorists who emphasized the experiential conditions of work in structuring ideology—we examine in this article the impact of job authority tasks on levels of support for policy to redistribute income. Such a focus contributes to a broader sociological understanding of the links between status, ideology, and political action. With data drawn from the 2010 and 2012 National Election Studies, we find that workplace experiences and tasks involving sanctioning/organizational responsibility as well as the hierarchical patterning of interactions on one’s job help structure generalized views regarding inequality and policy orientations ultimately enacted outside of the workplace. In this regard, the number of authority tasks is inversely related to support for redistributive policy. Subsequent analyses, however, reveal this general pattern does not hold on the basis of race: less variation in policy support as well as greater levels of policy support is expressed by African Americans than Whites across all authority task levels. We conclude by discussing how our findings inform broader conceptions regarding the link between work, ideology, and politics, as well a deeper sociological sense of the attitudinal consequences of work and the underpinnings of tenets of American stratification ideology.

Keywords

inequality work ideology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bobo

Kluegel

(1993). Opposition to race-targeting: Self-interest, stratification ideology or racial attitudes? American Sociological Review, 58, 443-464.

Bridges

Villemez

(1994). The employment relationship. New York, NY: Plenum.

Castillo

A-J.

Marques-Perales

(2014). Beliefs about social fluidity and preferences for state policies. Journal of Social Policy, 43, 615-633.

Conley

(1999). Being Black but living in the red. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Corbeta

Pasquele

(2013). Job precariousness and political orientations. European Society and Politics, 18, 333-354.

Dallinger

(2010). Public support for redistribution: What explains cross-national differences? Journal of European Social Policy, 20, 333-349.

Durkheim

(1984). The division of labor in society. New York, NY: Macmillan.

Halaby

Weakliem

(1993). Ownership and authority in the earnings function: Non-nested test of alternative specifications. American Sociological Review, 59, 5-21.

Hauesemann

Kurer

Schwander

(2015). High skilled outsiders? Labor market vulnerability, education, and welfare state preferences. Socio-Economic Review, 13, 235-258.

10.

Hochschild

(1995). Facing up to the American dream. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

11.

Hodson

(2001). Dignity at work. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

12.

Hunt

(2007). African American, Hispanic and White beliefs about Black/White inequality, 1977-2004. American Sociological Review, 72, 390-415.

13.

Kalleberg

(2009). Good jobs, bad jobs. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

14.

Kitschelt

Rehm

(2014). Occupations as a site of political preference formation. Comparative Political Studies, 47, 1670-1706.

15.

Kohn

(1969). Class and conformity: A study in values. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

16.

Kohn

(1983). Work and personality. New York, NY: Ablex.

17.

Lee

C.-S.

(2007). Why do some employees support welfare states more than others? Social Science Research, 36, 688-718.

18.

Leicht

Fennell

(2001). Professional work: A sociological approach. New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.

19.

Lukes

(1973). Emile Durkheim: His life and work. New York, NY: Penguin.

20.

Marx

(1965). The German ideology. London, England: Plenum.

21.

McCall

(2013). The undeserving rich: American beliefs about inequality, opportunity and redistribution. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

22.

Miller

W. E.

Kinder

Rosenstone

(1993). American National Election Study. Ann Arbor. Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.

23.

Perrucci

Wysong

(2007). Global economy and the privileged class. In Perrucci

Perrucci

(Eds.), Transformation of work in the new economy (pp. 63-82). Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.

24.

Rubin

(1987). Multiple imputation for non-responses in surveys. New York, NY: Wiley.

25.

Rudolph

T. J.

(2005). Political trust, ideology and public support for government spending. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 660-671.

26.

Shelton

Wilson

(2012). Race, class and the basis of group alignment: Support for redistributive policy among privileged Blacks. Sociological Perspectives, 52, 385-408.

27.

Smith

(2002). Race and gender authority in the workplace. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 509-652.

28.

Steele

(2015). Income inequality, equal opportunity and attitudes toward redistribution. Social Science Quarterly, 96, 444-464.

29.

Vallas

Hill

(2012). Conceptualizing power in work organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 34, 165-197.

30.

Wilson

(1997). Pathways to power: Racial differences in the determinants of job authority. Social Problems, 38, 48-64.

31.

Wilson

(2001). Support for redistributive policies among the African American middle class: Race and class effects. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 18, 97-115.