This comment focuses both on issues related to comparative analysis of media systems, and to issues related to immigration, specifically. It explores the implication of findings on the prevalence of human interest framing in immigration coverage for comparative analysis, suggesting that it may be too simplistic to assume that commercialization is always associated with human interest framing, particularly in coverage of marginalized populations. It also explores the complexity of public opinion on immigration, and issues about how to understand the role of media over time in the evolution of public opinion.
AalbergT.BeyerA. (2015). Human interest framing of irregular immigration: An empirical study of public preferences for personalized news stories in the United States, France, and Norway. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(7), 858-875. doi:10.1177/0002764215573258
2.
BangstadS. (2011). The morality police are coming! Muslims in Norway’s media discourses. Anthropology Today, 27(5), 3-7.
3.
BensonR. (2013). Shaping immigration news: A French-American comparison. New york: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BensonR.WoodT. (2015). Who says what or nothing at all? Speakers, frames, and frameless quotes in unauthorized immigration news in the United States, Norway, and France. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(7), 802-821. doi:10.1177/0002764215573257
5.
BeyerA.MatthesJ. (2015). Public perceptions of the media coverage of irregular immigration: Comparative insights from France, the United States, and Norway. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(7), 839-857. doi:10.1177/0002764215573253
6.
ChávezL. R. (2008). The Latino threat: Constructing immigrants, citizens and the nation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
EntmanR. M. (2004). Projections of power: Framing news, public opinion and U.S. foreign policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
9.
EntmanR. M.RojeckiA. (2000). The Black image in the White mind: Media and race in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10.
EwingK. (2008). Stolen honor: Stigmatizing Muslim men in Berlin. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11.
FigenschouT. U.ThorbjørnsrudK. (2015). Faces of an invisible population: Human interest framing of irregular immigration news in the United States, France, and Norway. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(7), 783-801. doi:10.1177/0002764215573256
12.
HallinD. C.ManciniP. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13.
HallinD. C. (in press). Media system. International encyclopedia of political communication. New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.
14.
IhlenØ.FigenschouT. U.LarsenA. G. (2015). Behind the framing scenes: Challenges and opportunities for NGOs and authorities framing irregular immigration. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(7), 822-838. doi:10.1177/0002764215573254
15.
ManciniP.HallinD. C. (2012). Some caveats about comparative research in media studies. In SemetkoH. A.ScammellM. (Eds.), Sage handbook of political communication (pp. 509-517). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Santa AnaO. (2002). Brown tide rising: Metaphors of Latinos in contemporary American political discourse. Austin: University of Texas Press.
18.
Santa AnaO.TreviñoS. L.BaileyM. J.BodossianK.NecocheaA. (2007). A May to remember. Du Bois Review, 4, 207-232.
19.
SidesJ.CitrinJ. (2007). European opinion about immigration: The role of identities, interests and information. British Journal of Political Science, 37, 477-504.
20.
ThorbjørnsrudK. (2015). Framing irregular immigration in Western media. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(7), 771-782. doi:10.1177/0002764215573255
21.
YilmazF. (2006). Ethnicized ontologies: From foreign WORKER to MUSLIM immigrant (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, San Diego.
22.
YılmazF. (2012). Right-wing hegemony and immigration: How the populist far-right achieved hegemony through the immigration debate in Europe. Current Sociology, 60, 368-381.
Wahl-JorgensonK. (2013). The strategic ritual of emotionality: A case study of Pulitzer-Prize winning articles. Journalism, 14, 129-145.
25.
WallenR. (2007). Barrier or bridge: Photojournalism of the San Diego/Tijuana border region. Communication Review, 6, 137-164.
26.
ZamithR. (2014). Just off the wire: AP’s and AFP’s coverage of immigration in France and the United States. In Dell’OrtoG.BirchfieldV. L. (Eds.), Reporting at the Southern borders: Journalism and public debates on immigration in the US and the EU (pp. 88-104). New York, NY: Routledge.
