Welfare Regimes,Policy Reforms,and Hybridity

Andreotti A. Mingione E. Polizzi E. (2012). Local welfare systems: A challenge for social cohesion. Urban Studies, 49(9), 1925–1940. doi:10.1177/0042098012444884

Anheier H. K. (2010). Social origins theory. In Anheier H. K. Toepler S. (Eds.), International encyclopedia of civil society (pp. 1445-1452). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

Anheier H. K. (2014). Nonprofit organizations: Theory, management, policy (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.

Arts W. Gelissen J. (2002). Three worlds of welfare capitalism or more? A state-of-the-art report. Journal of European Social Policy, 12(2), 137–158. doi:10.1177/0952872002012002114

Benz A. (2007). Multilevel governance. In Benz A. Lütz S. Schimank U. Simonis G. (Eds.), Handbuch Governance. Theoretische Grundlagen und empirische Anwendungsfelder (pp. 297–310). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

Bode I. Evers A. (2005). From institutional fixation to entrepreneurial mobility? The German Third Sector and its contemporary challenges. In Evers A. Laville J.-L. (Eds.), Globalization and welfare. The third sector in Europe (pp. 84–101). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Bornstein D. (2007). How to change the world: Social entrepreneurs and the power of new ideas (Updated ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Brandsen T. Larsson O. Nordfeldt M. (2012). Local welfare from a historical and institutional perspective: A comparative report (EMES Working Paper No. 12/01). Liege, Belgium: EMES.

Çalışkan K. Callon M. (2010). Economization, part 2: A research programme for the study of markets. Economy and Society, 39(1), 1–32. doi:10.1080/03085140903424519

Carr S. (2012). Participation, resistance and change: Examining influences on the impact of service user participation. In Beresford P. Carr S. (Eds.), Research highlights in social work series: Vol. 55. Social care, service users and user involvement (pp. 37–51). London, UK: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Coase R. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x

Dey P. (2006). The rhetoric of social entrepreneurship discourse: Paralogy and new language games in academic discourse. In Steyaert C. Hjorth D. (Eds.), Entrepreneurship as social change. A third movements in entrepreneurship book (pp. 121–144). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Esping-Andersen G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Giddens A. (1998). The third way: The renewal of social democracy. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Hall P. A. Soskice D. W. (Eds.). (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Hasenfeld Y. Gidron B. (2005). Understanding multi-purpose hybrid voluntary organizations: The contributions of theories on civil society, social movements and non-profit organizations. Journal of Civil Society, 1(2), 97–112.

Hirschman A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Hood C. (1995). The “new public management” in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(2/3), 93–109.

Kerlin J. A. (Ed.). (2009). Civil society. Social enterprise: A global comparison. Medford, MA: Tufts University Press.

Kerlin J. A. (2010). A comparative analysis of the global emergence of social enterprise. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 21(2), 162-179. doi:10.1007/s11266-010-9126-8

Koppell J.G.S. (2001). Hybrid organizations and the alignment of interests: The case of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Public Administration Review, 61(4), 468–482.

Mair J. Marti I. (2009). Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: A case study from Bangladesh. Journal of Business Venturing, 24, 419–435.

Martin G. P. (2011). The third sector, user involvement and public service reform: A case study in the co-governance of health service provision. Public Administration, 89(3), 909–932. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01910.x

Nicholls A. (2010). The legitimacy of social entrepreneurship: Reflexive isomorphism in a pre-paradigmatic field. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(4), 611–633.

Parks R. B. Baker P. C. Kiser L. Oskerson R. Ostrom E. Ostrom V. . . . Wilson R. (1981). Consumers as coproducers of public services: Some economic and institutional considerations. Policy Studies Journal, 9(7), 1001–1011.

Pavolini E. Ranci C. (2008). Restructuring the welfare state: Reforms in long-term care in Western European countries. Journal of European Social Policy, 18(3), 246–259. doi:10.1177/0958928708091058

Powell W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research on Organizational Behavior, 12, 295–336.

Ranci C. Pavolini E. (2013). Institutional change in long-term care. In Ranci C. Pavolini E. (Eds.), Reforms in long term care policies in Europe. Investigating institutional change and social impacts (pp. 269–314). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.

Roniger L. (1994). The comparative study of clientelism and the changing nature of civil society in the contemporary world. In Roniger L. Güneş-Ayata A. (Eds.), Democracy, clientelism, and civil society (pp. 1–18). Boulder, CO: L. Rienner Publishers.

Salamon L. M. Anheier H. K. (1998). Social origins of civil society: Explaining the nonprofit sector cross-nationally. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 9(3), 213–248. doi:10.1023/A:1022058200985

Salamon L. M. Sokolowski S. W. (Eds.). (2004). Global civil society (Vol. 2). Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian.

Schneider M. R. Paunescu M. (2012). Changing varieties of capitalism and revealed comparative advantages from 1990 to 2005: A test of the Hall and Soskice claims. Socio-Economic Review, 10(4), 731–753. doi:10.1093/ser/mwr038

Segura-Ubiergo A. (2007). The political economy of the welfare state in Latin America: Globalization, democracy, and development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Smith S. R. (2010). Hybridization and nonprofit organizations: The governance challenge. Policy and Society, 29(3), 219–229. doi:10.1016/j.polsoc.2010.06.003

Steyaert C. Dey P. (2010). Nine verbs to keep the social entrepreneurship research agenda ‘dangerous.’ Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(2), 231–254. doi:10.1080/19420676.2010.511817

Teasdale S. Lyon F. Baldock R. (2013). Playing with numbers: A methodological critique of the social enterprise growth myth. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 4(2), 113–131. doi:10.1080/19420676.2012.762800

Weber M. (1921). Economy and Society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Tübingen, Germany: Mohr-Siebeck.

Wegrich K. (2011, December). Hybridity and images of governance: Paradoxes and unintended consequences of public sector reform policies. Paper presented at the 2011 CSI Symposium “Leadership and Governance in Hybrid Organizations,” Heidelberg, Germany.

Weisbrod B. A. (1988). The nonprofit economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wood G. Gough I. (2006). A comparative welfare regime approach to global social policy. World Development, 34(10), 1696–1712. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.02.001