Using experimental design, this study compares first-time voters’ gratifications and uses of a traditional News1 format with the increasingly popular fake news format. The data here found that while indeed young people may have initially assessed a greater level of gratification associated with the fake news genre, the group was significantly “let down” after exposure to such a program. Though first-time voters understand that traditional surveillance-type information-seeking activities are better associated with traditional News, they were ambivalent about approaching and avoiding both traditional News and fake news genres.
BaumM. A. (2003). Soft news and political knowledge: Evidence of absence or absence of evidence?Political Communication, 20(2), 173–190. doi:10.1080/10584600390211181
2.
BaumM. A. (2005). Soft news goes to war: Public opinion and American foreign policy in the new media age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
BaymG. (2005). The Daily Show: Discursive integration and the reinvention of political journalism. Political Communication, 22(3), 259–276. doi:10.1080/10584600591006492
4.
BennettS. E. (2000). Political apathy and avoidance of news media among generations X and Y: America’s continuing problem. In MannS.PatrickJ. (Eds.), Education for civic engagement in democracy: Service learning and other promising practices (pp. 9–28). Bloomington, IN: ERIC Clearinghouse for Social Studies/Social Science Education.
5.
BennettW. L. (2008). Gatekeeping and press-government relations: A multigated model of news construction. In KaidL. L. (Ed.), Handbook of political communication research (pp. 283–313). New York: Routledge.
6.
BlumlerJ. G. (1979). The role of theory in uses and gratifications studies. Communication Research, 6(1), 9–36. doi:10.1177/009365027900600102
7.
BrewerP. R.MarquardtE. (2007). Mock news and democracy: Analyzing The Daily Show. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 15(4), 249–267. doi:10.1080/15456870701465315
8.
BrowningN. (2011). “Mad Money” madness: Jim Cramer’s image restoration effort. Public Relations Review, 37(2), 184–186. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.01.009
9.
Delli CarpiniM. X.WilliamsB. A. (2001). Let us infotain you: Politics in the new media age. In BennettW. L.EntmanR. M. (Eds.), Mediated politics: Communication in the future of democracy (pp. 160–181). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.
DiddiA.LaRoseR. (2006). Getting hooked on news: Uses and gratifications and the formation of news habits among college students in an Internet environment. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 50(2), 193–210. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem5002_2
11.
FeldmanL.YoungD. G. (2008). Late-night comedy as a gateway to traditional news: An analysis of time trends in news attention among late-night comedy viewers during the 2004 presidential primaries. Political Communication, 25(4), 401–422. doi:10.1080/10584600802427013
12.
GallowayJ. J.MeekF. L. (1981). Audience uses and gratifications: An expectancy model. Communication Research, 8(4), 435–449.
13.
HenkeL. L. (1985). Perceptions and use of news media by college students. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 29(4), 431–436. doi:10.1080/08838158509386598
14.
HerzogH. (1940). Professor quiz: A gratification study. In LazarsfeldP. F.StantonF. N. (Eds.), Radio and the printed page (pp. 64–93). New York: Duell, Sloan, & Pearce.
15.
HerzogH. (1944). What do we really know about daytime serial listeners? In LazarsfeldP. F.StantonF. N. (Eds.), Radio research 1942-1943 (pp. 3–33). New York: Duell, Sloan, & Pearce.
16.
HolbertR. L.LambeJ. L.DudoA. D.CarltonK. A. (2007). Primacy effects of The Daily Show and national TV news viewing: Young viewers, political gratifications, and internal political self-efficacy. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 51(1), 20–38. doi:10.1080/08838150701308002
17.
JohnsonT. J.KayeB. K. (2009). In blog we trust? Deciphering credibility of components of the Internet among politically interested Internet users. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(1), 175–182. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.004
18.
JohnsonT. J.KayeB. K. (2010). Choosing is believing? How web gratifications and reliance affect Internet credibility among politically interested users. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 18(1), 1–21. doi:10.1080/15456870903340431
19.
JohnsonT. J.KayeB. K.BichardS. L.WongW. J. (2007). Every blog has its day: Politically-interested Internet users’ perceptions of blog credibility. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 100–122. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00388.x
20.
KalbM. (1998). The rise of the “new news”: A case study of two root causes of the modern scandal coverage. Discussion Paper D-34, The Joan Shorenstein Center on Press, Politics, and Public Policy, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. Retrieved from http://www.hks.harvard.edu/presspol/publications/papers/discussion_papers/d34_kalb.pdf
21.
KatzE. (1959). Mass communication research and the study of culture. Studies in Public Communications, 2, 1–6.
22.
KatzE.BlumlerJ. G.GurevitchM. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509–523. doi:10.1086/268109
23.
KatzE.GurevitchM.HaasH. (1973). On the use of the mass media for important things. American Sociological Review, 38(2), 164–181. doi:10.2307/2094393
24.
KiousisS. (2001). Public trust or mistrust? Perceptions of media credibility in the information age. Mass Communication & Society, 4(4), 381–403. doi:10.1207/S15327825MCS0404_4
25.
LandrevilleK. D.HolbertR. L.LaMarreH. L. (2010). The influence of late-night TV comedy viewing on political talk: A moderated-mediation model. International Journal of Press/Politics, 15(4), 482–498. doi:10.1177/1940161210371506
26.
LariscyR. W.TinkhamS. F.SweetserK. D. (2011). Kids these days: Examining differences in political use and gratifications, Internet political participation, political information efficacy, and cynicism based on age. American Behavioral Scientist, 55(6), 749–764. doi:10.1177/0002764211398091
27.
LaswellH. D. (1948). The structure and function of communication in society. In BrysonL. (Ed.), The communication of ideas: A series of addresses (pp. 37–51). Binghamton, NY: Vail-Ballou Press.
28.
LinC. A. (1993). Modeling the gratification-seeking process of television viewing. Human Communication Research, 20(2), 224–244. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1993.tb00322.x
29.
MaccobyE. E. (1954). Why do children watch television?Public Opinion Quarterly, 18(3), 239–244. doi:10.1086/266512
30.
McKainA. (2005). Not necessarily not the news: Gatekeeping, remediation, and The Daily Show. Journal of American Culture, 28(4), 415–430. doi:10.1111/j.1542-734X.2005.00244.x
31.
McLeodJ. M.BeckerL. B. (1981). The uses and gratifications approach. In NimmoD. N.SandersK. R. (Eds.), Handbook of political communication (pp. 67–99). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
32.
McQuailD. (1984). With the benefit of hindsight: Reflections on uses and gratifications research. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 1(2), 177–193. doi:10.1080/15295038409360028
33.
MetzgerM. J.FlanaginA. J.ZwarunL. (2003). College student Web use, perceptions of information credibility, and verification behavior. Computers & Education, 41(3), 271–290. doi:10.1016/S0360-1315(03)00049-6
34.
MoodyK. E. (2011). Credibility or convenience? Political information choices in a media-saturated environment. Media International Australia, 140, 35–46.
35.
MoyP.XenosM. A.HessV. K. (2005). Priming effects of late-night comedy. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18(2), 198–210. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edh092
36.
MulderR. (1980). Media credibility: A use-gratifications approach. Journalism Quarterly, 57(3), 474–477. doi:10.1177/107769908005700315
37.
NabiR. L.Moyer-GuséE.ByrneS. (2007). All joking aside: A serious investigation into the persuasive effect of funny social issue messages. Communication Monographs, 74(1), 29–54. doi:10.1080/03637750701196896
38.
PalmgreenP.RayburnJ. D.II. (1979). Uses and gratifications and exposure to public television: A discrepancy approach. Communication Research, 6(2), 155–180. doi:10.1177/009365027900600203
39.
PalmgreenP.RayburnJ. D.II. (1982). Gratifications sought and media exposure: An expectancy value model. Communication Research, 9(4), 561–580. doi:10.1177/009365082009004004
40.
PalmgreenP.RayburnJ. D.II. (1985). A comparison of gratification models of media satisfaction. Communication Monographs, 52(4), 334–346. doi:10.1080/03637758509376116
41.
PattersonT. E. (2000). Doing well and doing good: How soft news and critical journalism are shrinking the news audience and weakening democracy—and what news outlets can do about it. The Joan Shorenstein Center on Press, Politics, and Public Policy, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. Retrieved August 26, 2012, from web.hks.harvard.edu/publications/getFile.aspx?Id=1
42.
PerseE. M. (1994). Political media gratifications scale. In RubinR. B.PalmgreenP.SypherH. W. (Eds.), Communication research measures: A sourcebook (pp. 296–300). New York: Guilford.
43.
Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (2007). Public knowledge of current affairs little changed by news and information revolutions. Retrieved August 26, 2012, from http://www.people-press.org/files/legacy-pdf/319.pdf
44.
QuanbeckA.WhiteD. (2009). Enjoying political news: The impact of political ideology, perception of media bias, and a preference for sources that agree with current beliefs. National Communication Association Annual Proceedings, pp. 1–30.
45.
RileyM. W.RileyJ. W. (1951). A sociological approach to communications research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(3), 445–460. doi:10.1086/266329
46.
RuggieroT. E. (2000). Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication & Society, 3(1), 3–37. doi:10.1207/S15327825MCS0301_02
47.
SkalskiP.TamboriniR.GlazerE.SmithS. (2009). Effects of humor on presence and recall of persuasive messages. Communication Quarterly, 57(2), 136–153. doi:10.1080/01463370902881619
48.
SweetserK. D.LariscyR. A.TinkhamS. F. (2012). The dabblers, devoted, developing, and disinterested: Examining political Internet use, Internet political sophistication, political information efficacy, and cynicism. Journal of New Communications Research Anthology.
49.
VincentR. C.BasilM. D. (1997). College students’ news gratifications, media use, and current events knowledge. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 41(3), 380–392. doi:10.1080/08838159709364414
50.
WennerL. A. (1983). Political news on television: A reconsideration of audience orientations. The Western Journal of Speech Communication, 47(4), 380–395. doi:10.1080/10570318309374132
51.
WrightC. R. (1960). Functional analysis and mass communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24(4), 605–620. doi:10.1086/266976
52.
YoungD. G.TisingerR. M. (2006). Dispelling late-night myths: News consumption among late-night comedy viewers and the predictors of exposure to various late-night shows. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 11(3), 113–134. doi:10.1177/1081180X05286042
53.
YuanE. (2011). News consumption across multiple media platforms. Information, Communication & Society, 14(7), 998–1016. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2010.549235
