This article identifies a marked difference in the type of race-based appeals that dominated Barack Obama’s presidential reelection contest in 2012 from his inaugural campaign in 2008. Racist appeals by Mitt Romney and the right in 2012 supplanted the racial appeals by Obama and the left in 2008. We focus our attention on a particularly salient form of racist appeal, one based on the long-standing stereotypes of black laziness and taking advantage. Specifically, we outline the historical underpinnings of these stereotypes. We then demonstrate how Romney and the right wove these underlying stereotypes into a seamless racist narrative—through political advertisements, online messaging, political speeches and debate statements—beginning with the Republican primary and continuing through the general election.
AmodioD. M.DevineP. G. (2006). Stereotyping and evaluation in implicit race bias: Evidence for independent constructs and unique effects on behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(4), 652–661.
2.
AmodioD. M.DevineP. G.Harmon-JonesE. (2008). Differences in the regulation of intergroup bias: The role of conflict monitoring and neural signals for control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(1), 60–74.
3.
BarretoM. A.CooperB. L.GonzalezB.ParkerC. S.TowlerC. (2011). The Tea Party in the age of Obama: Mainstream conservatism or out-group anxiety? In GoJ. (Ed.), Rethinking Obama (Political Power and Social Theory, Vol. 22, pp. 105–137). Boston, MA: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
4.
BogleD. (2001). Toms, coons, mulattoes, mammies and bucks: An interpretive history of Blacks in American films (4th ed.). New York, NY: Continuum.
5.
BrownL. M.BradleyM. M.LangP. J. (2006). Affective reactions to pictures of ingroup and outgroup members. Biological Psychology, 71, 303–311.
EntmanR. M.RojeckiA. (2000). The Black image in the White mind.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
9.
FraserC. (2009). Race, post-Black politics, and the democratic presidential candidacy of Barack Obama. Souls, 11, 17.
10.
GilensM. (2000). The Black poor and the “liberal press.”Civil Rights Journal, 5, 18–26.
11.
GreenwaldA. G.McGheeD. E.SchwartzJ. L. K. (1998). Individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464–1480.
12.
GrossA. (2010). What blood won’t tell: A history of race on trial in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
HancockA. M. (2004). The politics of disgust: The public identity of the welfare queen. New York, NY: New York University Press.
14.
HenryP. J.SearsD. O. (2002). The symbolic racism 2000 scale. Political Psychology, 23, 253–283.
15.
KinderD. R.SearsD. O. (1981). Prejudice and politics: Symbolic racism versus racial threats to the good life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 414–431.
16.
LegumJ. (2012, September27). The truth about the Obama phone. Available from ThinkProgress.org
17.
LipsitzG. (1998). The possessive investment in Whiteness: How White people profit from identity politics. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
18.
MarableM. (2009). Racializing Obama: The enigma of post-black politics and leadership. Souls, 11, 1.
19.
McConahayJ. B. (1986). Modern racism, ambivalence, and the modern racism scale. In DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L. (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 91–125). Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
20.
McIlwainC. D. (2011). Racialized media coverage of minority candidates in the 2008 Democratic presidential primary. American Behavioral Scientist, 55(4), 371–389.
21.
McIlwainC. D.CaliendoS. M. (2011). Race appeal: How candidates invoke race in U.S. political campaigns. Philadelphia, PA: Temple.
22.
MendelbergT. (2001). The race card: Campaign strategy, implicit messages, and the norm of equality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23.
OgletreeC. (2010). The presumption of guilt: The arrest of Henry Louis Gates, Jr. and race, class and crime in America. New York, NY: Macmillan.
24.
PlantE. A.DevineP. G. (1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 811–832.
ValentinoN. A.HutchingsV. L.WhiteI. K. (2002). Cues that matter: How political ads prime racial attitudes during campaigns. American Political Science Review, 96, 75–90.
31.
WinterN. J. G. (2008). Dangerous frames: How ideas about race & gender shape public opinion. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
