AckerJ. R. (1991). Hierarchies, jobs, and bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender and Society, 4, 139-158.
2.
BourdieuP. (1989). Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory, 7, 14-25.
3.
BourdieuP. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
CollinsS. (1997). Black corporate executives. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
5.
CrossleyN. (2010). Towards relational sociology. London, UK: Routledge.
6.
Della FaveL. R. (1980). The meek shall not inherit the earth: Self-evaluation and the legitimacy of Stratification. American Sociological Review, 45, 955-971.
7.
Della FaveL. R. (1986). Toward an explication of the legitimation process. Social Forces, 65, 476-500.
8.
DobbinF. (1994). Cultural models of organization: The social construction of rational organizing principles. In CraneD. (Ed.), The sociology of culture: Emerging theoretical perspectives (pp. 117-141). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
9.
DonatiP. (2011). Relational sociology. A new paradigm for the social sciences. London, UK: Routledge.
10.
EmirbayerM. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 281-317.
11.
FeathermanD.HauserR. (1977). Opportunity and change. New York, NY: Basic Books.
12.
GiddensA. (1984). The constitution of society: An outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
13.
GoffmanE. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. New York, NY: Anchor.
14.
GramsciA. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks (HoareQ.SmithG. N. Eds.). New York, NY: International.
15.
GrossN. (2009). A pragmatist theory of social mechanisms. American Sociological Review, 74, 358-379.
HirshE. (2009). The strength of weak enforcement: The impact of discrimination charges on sex and race segregation in the workplace. American Sociological Review, 74, 245-271.
18.
JacobsJ. (1989). Revolving doors: Sex segregation and women’s careers. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
19.
KalevA. (2009). Cracking the glass cages? Restructuring and ascriptive inequality at work. American Journal of Sociology, 114, 1591-1643.
20.
KalevA.DobbinF.KellyE. (2006). Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. American Sociological Review, 71, 589-617.
21.
MargolisD. R. (1989). Considering women’s experience: A reformulation of power theory. Theory and Society, 18, 387-418.
22.
MaumeD. J. (1999). Glass ceilings and glass escalators: Occupational segregation and race and sex differences in managerial promotions. Work & Occupations, 26, 483-509.
23.
McBrierD. B. (2001). Gender and career dynamics within a segmented professional labor market: The case of law academia. Social Forces, 81, 1201-1266.
24.
MorganD. L. (2007). Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 48-76.
25.
MorrillC. (2008). Culture and organization theory. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 619, 15-40.
26.
PachuckiM. A.BreigerR. L. (2010). Cultural holes: Beyond relationality in social networks and culture. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 205-224.
27.
PagerD. (2009). Marked: Race, crime and finding work in an era of mass incarceration. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
28.
ParkinF. (1979). Marxism and class theory: A bourgeois critique. London, UK: Tavistock.
29.
PearceL. D. (2012). Mixed methods inquiry in sociology. American Behavioral Scientist, 56, 829-848.
30.
ReskinB. (2003). Including mechanisms in our models of ascriptive inequality. American Sociological Review, 68, 1-21.
31.
RidgewayC. L.BackorK.LiY. E.TinklerJ. E.EricksonK. (2009). How easily does a social difference become a status distinction? Gender matters. American Sociological Review, 74, 44-62.
32.
RidgewayC. L.Smith-LovinL. (1999). Interaction in the gender system: Theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 191-216.
33.
RogersM. F. (1974). Instrumental and infra-resources: The bases of power. American Journal of Sociology, 79, 1418-1433.
34.
RoscignoV. J. (2007). The face of discrimination: How race and gender impact work and home lives. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
35.
RoscignoV. J. (2011). Power, revisited. Social Forces, 90, 349-374.
36.
RoscignoV. J.HodsonR.LopezS. H. (2009). Workplace incivilities: The role of interest conflicts, social closure and organisational chaos. Work, Employment & Society, 23, 747-773.
37.
RoysterD. (2003). Race and the invisible hand: How White networks exclude Black men from blue-collar jobs. Berkeley: University of California Press.
38.
SkaggsS. (2009). Legal-political pressures and African American access to managerial jobs. American Sociological Review, 74, 225-244.
39.
StainbackK.Tomaskovic-DeveyD. (2012). Documenting desegregation: Racial and gender segregation in private-sector employment since the Civil Rights Act. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
40.
StrykerR. (2000). Legitimacy processes as institutional politics: Implications for theory and research in the sociology of organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 17, 179-223.
41.
TillyC. (1999). Durable inequality. Berkeley: University of California Press.
42.
VallasS. (2006). Empowerment redux: Structure, agency, and the re-making of managerial authority. American Journal of Sociology, 111, 1677-1717.
43.
WeberM. (1968). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (RothG.WittichC. Eds.). New York, NY: Bedminister Press.
44.
WeedenK. A. (2008). Occupational closure and earnings inequality. In GruskyD. B. (Ed.), Social stratification: Class, race, and gender in sociological perspective (3rd ed., pp. 176-186). Boulder, CO: Westview.
45.
WilsonG.Sakura-LemesseyI.WestJ. P. (1999). Reaching the top: Racial differences in mobility paths to upper-tier occupations. Work & Occupations, 26, 165-186.
46.
ZelizerV. (2005). The purchase of intimacy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
47.
ZelizerV. (2012). How I became a relational economic sociologist and what does that mean?Politics & Society, 40, 145-174.