This article discusses the need for an ethical code for states in international migration management (IMM). IMM is interpreted as an ethical context characterized by moral dilemmas, insofar as it is difficult to irrefutably know if the decision to “allow entry” or “deny entry” of people is good and right. This calls for an applied ethics approach drawing a normative map in a world in motion, and then for an ethical code of practice regulating state behavior at three levels: admission policies, diplomatic relations with sending states, and inter-European state relations. The discussion is framed within the current five-year strategy of the EU Stockholm Programme and the migration polices of European states.
AdamsonF. B.TriadafilopoulosT.ZolbergA. R. (2011). The limits of the liberal state: Migration, identity and belonging in Europe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 37, 843-859.
2.
Amnesty International. (2007). Migration-related detention: A research guide on human rights standards relevant to the detention of migrants, asylum-seekers and refugees. Amnesty International November. POL 33/005/2007.
3.
Amnesty International. (2008). Migration-related detention: A global concern. Amnesty International December. POL 33/004/2008.
4.
AubarellG.Zapata-BarreroR.AragallX. (2009). New directions of national immigration policies: The development of the external dimension and its relationship with Euro-Mediterranean process. Euromesco Papers, 79. Retrieved from http://dcpis.upf.edu/~ricard-zapata/paper79eng.pdf.
5.
BarryB. (1986). Can states be moral? International morality and the compliance problem. In EllisA. (Ed.), Ethics and international relations (pp. 61-92). Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
6.
BeauchampT. L. (2005). The nature of applied ethics. In FreyR. G.Heath WellmanC. (Eds.), A companion to applied ethics (pp. 1-16). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
7.
BigoD. (2005). From foreigners to “abnormal aliens”: How the faces of the enemy have changed following September the 11th. In GuildE.van SelmJ. (Eds.), International migration and security: Opportunities and challenges (pp. 64-81). London, UK: Routledge.
8.
BigoD.GuildE. (2005). Policing at distance: Schengen visa policies. In BigoD.GuildE. (Eds.), Controlling frontiers: Free movement into and within Europe (pp. 233-263). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
9.
BigoD.JeandesbozJ. (2009). Border security, technology and the Stockholm Programme (INEX Policy Brief 3). Brussels, Belgium: Centre for European Policy Studies.
10.
BlakeM. (2007). Immigration. In FreyR. G.Heath WellmanC. (Eds.), A companion to applied ethics (pp. 224-237). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
11.
BoswellC. (2003). “The external dimension” of EU immigration and asylum policy. International Affairs, 79, 619-683.
12.
BuchanJ. (2008). How can the migration of health service professionals be managed so as to reduce any negative effects on supply?Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe.
13.
CarensJ. (1997). The philosopher and the policymaker: Two perspectives on the ethics of immigration with special attention to the problem of restricting asylum. In HailbronnerK.MartinD.MotomuraH. (Eds.), Immigration admissions: The search for workable policies in Germany and the United States (pp. 3-51). Oxford, UK: Berghahn Books.
14.
CarreraS.Faure AtgerA. (2009, August). Yes! A rights-based approach to migration is possible for Stockholm Programme!ENARgy, 29, 10-11.
DebenedettiS. (2006, June). Externalization of European asylum and migration policies. Paper presented at the Florence School on Euro-Mediterranean Migration and Development, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, Florence, Italy.
18.
DoverR. (2008). Towards a common EU immigration policy: A securitization too far. European Integration, 30, 113-130.
European Commission. (2009). An area of freedom, security and justice serving the citizen (Com (2009) 262 final). Brussels, Belgium: Author.
21.
European Network Against Racism. (2007). Shadow reports on racism in Europe. Brussels: European Network Against Racism.
22.
European Network Against Racism. (2008). Shadow reports on racism in Europe. Brussels: European Network Against Racism.
23.
European Network Against Racism. (2009). 15 principles for framing a positive approach to migration. NovemberParis: European Network Against Racism.
24.
FrostM. (2009). Global ethics. London, UK: Routledge.
25.
GeigerM.PécoudA. (2010). The politics of international migration management. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
26.
Global Commission on International Migration. (2005). Migration in an interconnected world: New directions for action. Retrieved from http://www.gcim.org/en/finalreport.html
International Labour Organization. (2010). International labour migration: A right-based approach. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
35.
International Organization for Migration. (2000). World Migration Report 2000. Geneva: IOM.
36.
International Organization for Migration. (2003). World Migration Report 2005: Managing migration - challenges and responses for people on the move. Geneva: IOM.
37.
International Organization for Migration. (2004). Glossary on migration. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
38.
International Organization for Migration. (2005). World Migration Report 2005: Costs and benefits of international migration. Geneva: IOM.
39.
International Organization for Migration. (2008). World Migration Report 2008: Managing labour mobility in the evolving global economy. Geneva: IOM.
40.
John-HopkinsM. (2009). The emperor’s new safe country concepts: A UK perspective on sacrificing fairness on the altar of efficiency. International Journal of Refugee Law, 21, 250-251.
41.
JoppkeC. (2005). Selecting by origin: Ethnic migration in the liberal state. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42.
LavenexS. (2006). Shifting up and out: The foreign policy of European immigration control. West European Politics, 29, 329-350.
43.
LavenexS. (2008). A governance perspective on the European neighbourhood policy: Integration beyond conditionality?Journal of European Public Policy, 15, 938-955.
44.
LindströmC. (2005). European Union policy on asylum and immigration: Addressing the root causes of forced migration: A justice and home affairs policy of freedom, security and justice?Social Policy and Administration, 39, 587-605.
MartineauT.DeckeK.BundredP. (2004). “Brain drain” of health professionals: From rhetoric to responsible action. Health Policy, 70, 1-10.
47.
MillerD. (2005). Immigration: The case for limits. In CohenA. I.WellmanC. H. (Eds.), Contemporary debates in applied ethics (pp. 193-206). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
48.
ModoodT.TriandafyllidouA.Zapata-BarreroR. (Eds.). (2006). Multiculturalism, Muslims and citizenship: A European approach. New York, NY: Routledge.
49.
MoravcsikA.VachudovaM. A. (2003). National interests, state power, and EU enlargement. East European Politics and Societies, 17, 42-57.
MountfordA.RapoportH. (2007). The brain drain and the world distribution of income and population (Discussion Paper Series 0704). London, UK: Centre for Research and Analysis of Migration.
52.
PagettC.PadarathA. (2007). A review of codes and protocols for the migration of health workers. Discussion Paper No. 50). Harare, Zimbabwe: EQUINET.
53.
ParkerO.BrassettJ. (2005). Contingent borders, ambiguous ethics: Migrants in (international) political theory. International Studies Quarterly, 49, 233-253.
54.
PécoudA. (2009). The UN Convention on Migrant Workers’ Rights and international migration management. Global Society, 23, 333-350.
55.
PécoudA.de GuchteneireP. (Eds.). (2007). Migration without borders: Essays on the free movement of people. Paris, France: UNESCO.
56.
RijpmaJ.CremonaM. (2007). The extra-territorialisation of EU migration policies and the rule of law (Working Paper Law No. 2007/01). Florence, Italy: European University Institute.
57.
RodierC. (2006, June8). Analysis of the external dimension of the EU’s asylum and immigration policies—Summary and recommendations for the European Parliament (PE 374.366). Strasbourg, France: European Parliament, Directorate-General for External Policies of the Union.
58.
ScottM. L.WhelanA.DewdneyJ.ZwiA. B. (2004). “Brain drain” or ethical recruitment? Solving health workforce shortages with professionals from developing countries. Global Health, 180, 174-176.
StubenrauchJ. M. (2008). The ethics of recruiting foreign-educated nurses: Can a new code ensure ethical treatment?American Journal of Nursing, 108(12), 25-26.
61.
Transatlantic Academy. (2009). Immigration report: No shortcuts: Selective migration and integration. Washington, DC: Author.
62.
TriandafyllidouA.ModoodT.MeerN. (Eds.). (2011). European multiculturalism(s): Cultural, religious and ethnic challenges. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
63.
United Nation. (2006). High-level dialogue on international migration and development. New York. Reference A/61/515.
64.
United Nations Development Programme. (2009). Human development report 2009 overcoming barriers: Human mobility and development. New York: Human Development Report Office.
65.
UN General Assembly. (2006). International migration and development: Report of the secretary-general. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
66.
Van MunsterR. (2005). The EU and the management of immigration risk in the area of freedom, security and justice (Political Science Publications 12). Odense: University of Southern Denmark.
67.
VertovecS.WessendorfS. (Eds.). (2010). The Multiculturalism backlash: European discourses, policies and practices. London, UK: Routledge.
68.
WhelanF. G. (1998). Citizenship and freedom of movement: An open admissions policy? In GibneyM. (Ed.), Open borders? Closed societies? The ethical and political issues (pp. 3-39). London, UK: Greenwood.
69.
WolffS. (2008). Border management in the Mediterranean: internal, external and ethical challenges. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 21, 253-271.
70.
WolffS. (2010). EU integrated border management beyond Lisbon: Contrasting policies and practice. In Zapata-BarreroR. (Ed.), Shaping the normative contours of the European Union: A migration-border framework (pp. 23-36). Barcelona, Spain: CIDOB Foundation.
71.
WolffS.GoudappelF.de ZwaanJ. (Eds.). (2011). The area of freedom, security and justice: Myth or reality? Taking stock of the Lisbon Treaty and the Stockholm Programme. The Hague, Netherlands: T.M.C. Asser Press.
72.
WolffS.Zapata-BarreroR. (2011). Border management: Impacting on the construction of the EU as a polity? In WolffS.GoudappelF.de ZwaanJ. (Eds.), The area of freedom, security and justice: Myth or reality? Taking stock of the Lisbon Treaty and the Stockholm Programme (pp. 117-134). The Hague, Netherlands: T.M.C. Asser Press.
73.
World Health Organization. (2008, December4). International recruitment of health personnel: Draft global code of practice: Report by the Secretariat Executive Board (EB124/13, 124th Session). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
74.
WrightE. O. (2007). Guidelines for envisioning real utopias. Soundings, 36, 26-39.
75.
Zapata-BarreroR. (2009a). Policies and public opinion towards immigrants: The Spanish case. Journal Ethnic and Racial Studies, 32, 1101-1120.
76.
Zapata-BarreroR. (2009b). Political discourses about Borders: On the emergence of a European political community. In LindahlH. (Ed.), A right to inclusion and exclusion? Normative fault lines of EU’s area of freedom, security and justice (pp. 15-31). Oxford, UK: Hart.
77.
Zapata-BarreroR. (Ed.). (2010a). Shaping the normative contours of the European Union: A migration-border framework. Barcelona, Spain: CIDOB Foundation.
78.
Zapata-BarreroR. (2010b). Theorizing state behaviour in international migrations: An evaluative ethical framework. Social Research, 77, 325-352.
79.
ZolbergA. R. (1999). Matters of state: Theorizing immigration policy. In HirschmanC.KasinitzP.DeWindJ. (Eds.), The handbook of international migration: The American experience (pp. 71-93). New York, NY: Russell Sage.
