Staying “On Message”: Consistency in Content of Presidential Primary Campaign Messages Across Media

Abstract

This study investigates the extent to which candidates in the 2008 presidential primary campaign adhered to the convention wisdom that candidates should stay “on message.” Content analysis investigated multiple media (announcement speeches, TV spots, radio spots, debates, candidate webpages, and candidate MySpace/Facebook pages) from 9 Democratic and 12 Republican candidates. Four variables were investigated: functions, topics, party issue emphasis, and own party issue ownership. Although there was considerable consistency across message form, results revealed that 63 of 76 comparisons candidates were not consistent in tone, topic, party issue emphasis, or own party issue emphasis across messages. Post hoc analyses excluding debates (where the candidates have less control over the content of their messages, given the expectation that they will respond to the questions asked) revealed differences even among the message forms over which candidates have complete control over content.

Keywords

2008 presidential primary tone topic party issue ownership consistency

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baines, P.R. ( 1999). Voter segmentation and candidate positioning. In B. I. Newman (Ed.), Handbook of political marketing (pp. 403-420). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Benoit, W.L. ( 1999). Seeing spots: A functional analysis of Presidential television advertisements, 1952-1996. Westport, CT: Praeger.

Benoit, W.L. ( 2000). A functional analysis of political advertising across media, 1998. Communication Studies, 51, 274-295.

Benoit, W.L. ( 2007). Communication in political campaigns. New York, NY: Peter Lang.

Benoit, W.L. , Blaney, J.R. , & Pier, P.M. ( 1998). Campaign ‘96: A functional analysis of acclaiming, attacking, and defending. Westport, CT: Praeger.

Benoit, W.L. , & Brazeal, L.M. ( 2002). A functional analysis of the 1988 Bush-Dukakis presidential debates. Argumentation and Advocacy, 38, 219-233.

Benoit, W.L. , & Hansen, G.J. ( 2004). Issue ownership in primary and general presidential debates . Argumentation and Advocacy, 40, 143-154.

Benoit, W.L. , & Harthcock, A. ( 1999). Functions of the great debates: Acclaims, attacks, and defenses in the 1960 presidential debates. Communication Monographs , 66, 341-357.

Benoit, W.L. , McHale, J.P. , Hansen, G.J. , Pier, P.M. , & McGuire, J.P. ( 2003). Campaign 2000: A functional analysis of presidential campaign discourse. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

10.

Benoit, W.L. , & Stein, K.A. ( 2005). A functional analysis of presidential direct mail advertising . Communication Studies, 56, 203-225.

11.

Benoit, W.L. , Stein, K.A. , McHale, J.P. , Chattopadhyay, S. , Verser, R. , & Price, S. ( 2007). Bush versus Kerry: A functional analysis of campaign 2004. New York, NY: Peter Lang.

12.

Berelson, B. ( 1952). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities . Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

13.

Bradshaw, J.C. ( 2004). Who will vote for you and why: Designing campaign strategy and message. In J. A. Thurber & C. J. Nelson (Eds.), Campaigns and elections American style (pp. 37-56). Boulder, CO: Westview .

14.

Carville, J. , & Begala, P. ( 2002). Buck up, suck up . . . and come back when you foul up . New York, NY: Simon & Schuster .

15.

Cohen, J. ( 1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.

16.

Holsti, O. ( 1969). Content analysis in communication research. New York, NY: Free Press.

17.

Jarman, J.W. ( 2005). Political affiliation and presidential debates: A real-time analysis of the effect of the arguments used in the presidential debates. American Behavioral Scientist, 49, 229-242.

18.

Landis, J.R. , & Koch, G.G. ( 1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174.

19.

Petrocik, J.R. ( 1996). Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 825-850.

20.

Petrocik, J.R. , Benoit, W.L. , & Hansen, G.L. ( 2003-2004). Issue ownership and presidential campaigning, 1952-2000 . Political Science Quarterly, 118, 599-626.

21.

Reinemann, C. , & Maurer, M. ( 2005). Unifying or polarizing? Short-term effects and post-debate consequences of different rhetorical strategies in televised debates. Journal of Communication, 55, 775-794.

22.

Schnur, D. ( 1999). Greater than the sum of its parts: Coordinating the paid and earned media message. In B. I. Newman (Ed.), Handbook of political marketing (pp. 143-158). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

23.

Shea, D.M. ( 1996). The strategies, tactics, and art of political campaign management. Westport, CT: Praeger .