In this study, the authors examine the composition of the audiences for the presidential and vice presidential debates in 2008. Results from the 2008 National Annenberg Election Survey show that the size of the vice presidential debate-viewing audience in 2008 exceeded the sizes of the presidential debate-viewing audiences, which is atypical from prior campaign seasons. The same general demographic and political characteristics that have driven political debate viewing in the past were operative during the 2008 presidential and vice presidential debate season, with debate viewing by Blacks being a notable exception. Contrary to our predictions, females were not more likely than males to watch the vice presidential debate. Debate watching was significantly associated with the favorability ratings of the candidates on the Democratic ticket, but it was not associated with the ratings of the Republican nominees.
Becker, L.B., Sobowale, I.A., Cobbey, R.E., & Eyal, C.H. ( 1978). Debates’ effects on voters’ understanding of candidates and issues. In G. F. Bishop , R. G. Meadow, & M. Jackson-Beeck (Eds.), The presidential debates: Media, electoral, and policy perspectives (pp. 126-139). New York, NY: Praeger.
2.
Benoit, W.L., & Hansen, G.J. ( 2004). Presidential debate watching, issue knowledge, character evaluation, and vote choice. Human Communication Research , 30, 121-144.
3.
Benoit, W.L., Hansen, G.J., & Verser, R.M. ( 2003). A meta-analysis of the effects of viewing U.S. presidential debates. Communication Monographs, 70, 335-350.
4.
Benoit, W.L., McKinney, M.S., & Stephenson, M.T. (2002). Effects of watching primary debates in the 2000 U.S. presidential campaign. Journal of Communication, 52, 316-331.
5.
Bishop, G.F., Oldendick, R.W., & Tuchfarber, A.J. (1978). Debate watching and the acquisition of political knowledge. Journal of Communication , 28, 99-113.
6.
Commission on Presidential Debates. (2008). 2008 debates. Retrieved from http://debates.org/pages/his_2008.html
7.
Deutschmann, P.J. ( 1977). Viewing, conversations, and voting intentions. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Kennedy vs. Nixon, 1960, a reissue (pp. 232-252). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
8.
Graber, D.A. ( 1978). Problems in measuring audience effects of the 1976 debates . In G. F. Bishop, R. G. Meadow, & M. Jackson-Beeck (Eds.), The presidential debates: Media, electoral, and policy perspectives (pp. 105-125). New York, NY : Praeger.
9.
Hart, R.P., & Jarvis, S.E. ( 1997). Political debate: Forms, styles, and media. American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 1095-1122.
10.
Holbert, R.L., Benoit, W.L., Hansen, G.J., & Wen, W.-C. (2002). The role of communication in the formation of an issue-based citizenry. Communication Monographs, 69, 296-310.
11.
Holbrook, T.M. ( 1994). The behavioral consequences of vice-presidential debates: Does the undercard have any punch? American Politics Research , 22, 469-482.
12.
Holbrook, T.M. ( 1999). Political learning from presidential debates. Political Behavior, 21, 67-89.
13.
Jamieson, K.H., & Adasiewicz, C. (2000). What can voters learn from election debates? In S. Coleman (Ed.), Televised election debates: International perspectives (pp. 25-42). New York, NY: St. Martin’s.
14.
Katz, E., & Feldman, J.J. ( 1977). The debates in the light of research: A survey of surveys . In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Kennedy vs. Nixon, 1960, a reissue (pp. 173-223). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
15.
Kenski, K. ( 2008, March 24). Americans following presidential campaign more closely than in 2004, Annenberg data show [Press release]. Retrieved from http://annenbergpublicpolicycenter.com/NewsFilter.aspx?mySubType=ALL&
16.
Kenski, K., & Jamieson, K.H. (2006). Issue knowledge and perceptions of agreement in the 2004 presidential general election. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 36, 243-259.
17.
Kenski, K., & Stroud, N.J. ( 2005). Who watches presidential debates? A comparative analysis of presidential debate viewing in 2000 and 2004. American Behavioral Scientist, 49, 213-228.
18.
Lang, K., & Lang, G.E. ( 1961). Ordeal by debate: Viewer reactions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 25, 277-288.
19.
Lanoue, D.J., & Schrott, P.R. ( 1989). Voters’ reactions to televised presidential debates: Measurement of the source and magnitude of opinion change. Political Psychology, 10, 275-285.
20.
OpenSecrets.org Center for Responsive Politics. ( 2008). Presidential fundraising and spending, 1976-2008. Retrieved from http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/totals.php?cycle=2008
21.
Payne, J.G., Golden, J.L., Marlier, J., & Ratzan, S.C. ( 1989). Perceptions of the 1988 presidential and vice presidential debates. American Behavioral Scientist, 32, 425-435.
22.
Tsfati, Y. ( 2003). Debating the debate: The impact of exposure to debate news coverage and its interaction with exposure to the actual debate. Harvard International Journal of Press/ Politics, 8, 70-86.
23.
Zhu, J.-H., Milavsky, J.R., & Biswas, R. ( 1994). Do televised debates affect image perception more than issue knowledge? A study of the first 1992 presidential debates. Human Communication Research, 20, 302-333.
