In this article, the authors use the concept of negative social capital to address the contextual impact of micro mechanisms explaining political legitimacy. They first illustrate the effect of social capital with regard to its negative consequences. Then they select four countries, each one a case study of a different welfare regime, and measure the distribution of “time given helping others.” The helping behavior is interpreted as a credit slip in social capital vocabulary, and its effect on the confidence in democracy in different welfare regimes is measured. The research findings suggest that helping behavior in weaker welfare regimes has detrimental consequences for political legitimacy. The results are consistent both in a cross-country and in a within-country comparison.
Baker, W., & Faulkner, R.R. (2004). Social networks and loss of capital. Social Networks, 26, 91-111.
2.
Barnes, S., Kaase, M., et al. (1979). Political action: Mass participation in five Western democracies. London: Sage.
3.
Burt, R.S. ( 2001). Structural holes versus network closure as social capital . In N. Lin, K. Cook, & R. Burt (Eds.), Social capital (pp. 31-56). New York: Aldine .
4.
Coleman, J.S. ( 1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
Coleman, J.S. ( 1993). The rational reconstruction of society. American Sociological Review, 58(1), 1-15.
6.
Coleman, J.S. ( 1994). A rational choice perspective on economic sociology. In N. Smelser & R. Swedberg (Eds.), The handbook of economic sociology (pp. 166-180). New York: Russell Sage.
7.
Elster, J. ( 1983). Explaining technical change. Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Esping-Andersen, G. ( 1999). Social foundation of post-industrial economies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
9.
Ferrera, M. ( 1996). The "southern" model of welfare in social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 6(1), 17-37.
10.
Ferrera, M. ( 2006). Le politiche sociali [The social policies]. Bologna, Italy: Il Mulino.
11.
Flache, A. ( 1996). The double edge of networks. Amsterdam : Thesis.
12.
Granovetter, M. ( 1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510.
13.
Granovetter, M. ( 2000). A theoretical agenda for economic sociology. In M. Guillen, R. Collins, P. England, & M. Meyer (Eds.), The new economic sociology: Developments in an emerging field (pp. 35-59). New York: Russell Sage.
14.
Granovetter, M. ( 2005). The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(1), 33-50.
15.
Hedström, P. ( 2005). Dissecting the social. On the principles of analytical sociology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Hooghe, M., & Stolle, D. (Eds.). (2003). Generating social capital. Civil society and institutions in comparative perspective. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave.
17.
Inglehart, R. ( 1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18.
Künemund, H., & Rein, M. ( 1999). There is more to receiving than needing: Theoretical arguments and empirical exploration of crowding in and crowding out. Ageing and Society, 19, 93-121.
19.
Mizruchi, M. ( 2007). Political economy and network analysis. An untapped convergence . Sociologica, 2. Retrieved October 20, 2008, from http://www.sociologica.mulino.it/doi/10.2383/24765
20.
Mizruchi, M., & Stearns, L. ( 2001). Getting deals done: The use of social networks in bank decision making. American Sociological Review, 66(5), 647-671.
21.
Parsons, T. ( 1943). The kinship system of the contemporary United States . American Anthropologist, 45(1), 22-38.
22.
Pichler, F., & Wallace, C. ( 2007). Patterns of formal and informal social capital in Europe . European Sociological Review, 23(4), 423-435.
23.
Podolny, J.M., & Page, K.L. ( 1998). Network form of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 57-76.
24.
Portes, A. ( 1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1-24.
25.
Portes, A., & Landolt, P. ( 1996). The downside of social capital. American Prospect, 94, 18-21.
26.
Portes, A., & Sensenbrenner, J. (1993). Embeddedness and immigration: Notes on the social determinants of economic action. American Journal of Sociology, 98(6), 1320-1350.
27.
Putnam, R.D. ( 1993). Making democracy work. Civic traditions in modern Italy . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28.
Putnam, R.D. ( 2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community . New York: Simon & Schuster .
29.
Smith-Doerr, L., & Powell, W. ( 2005). Networks and economic life. In N. Smelser & R. Swedberg (Eds.), Handbook of economic sociology (2nd ed., pp. 379-402). New York: Russell Sage.
30.
Stiglitz, J.E. ( 2000). Formal and informal institutions. In P. Dasgupta & I. Serageldin (Eds.), Social capital: A multifaceted perspective (pp. 59-68). Washington, DC: World Bank.
31.
Uzzi, B. ( 1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly , 42, 35-47.
