The authors examine how the U.S. peace movement responded to the Bush administration’s attempts to generate and capitalize on a heightened sense of threat after the 9/11 attacks. Longitudinal analysis of statements by U.S. peace movement organizations issued before and after 9/11 indicates that the movement’s discourse is both ideologically consistent and contextually adaptive. In each period, movement discourse highlighted the U.S. government as a source of threat and people living outside of the United States as the targets of that threat. Nonetheless, the movement’s discourse changed significantly in the exacerbated climate of fear in the first 4 months after the 9/11 attacks and then began to revert to pre-9/11 patterns during the Iraq War when the salience of threat declined. This research significantly advances knowledge of social movement discourse by establishing that ideological consistency and contextual adaptation are not mutually exclusive, by highlighting the contextual and dialogical factors that encourage certain types of movement responses to dominant discourses, and by explaining the role of emotional work in mobilizing dissent.
Alterman, E. ( 2004). Fear: What is it good for? Social Research , 71, 997-1014.
2.
Altheide, D.L. ( 2002). Creating fear: News and the construction of crisis. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
3.
Aminzade, R., & McAdam, D. (2001). Emotions and contentious politics. In R. Aminzade et al. (Eds.), Silence and voice in the study of contentious politics (pp. 14-50). New York: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Anderson, P. ( 1976). The antimonies of Antonio Gramsci. New Left Review, 100(November-December), 5-78.
5.
Carroll, W.K., & Ratner, R.S. ( 2001). Sustaining oppositional cultures in "post-socialist" times: A comparative study of three social movement organizations. Sociology, 35(3), 605-629.
6.
Coles, R.L. ( 1999). Odd folk and ordinary people: Collective identity disparities between peace groups in the Persian Gulf crisis. Sociological Spectrum, 19(3), 325-357.
7.
Coy, P.G., & Woehrle, L.M. ( 1996). Constructing identity and oppositional knowledge: The framing practices of peace movement organizations during the Persian Gulf War. Sociological Spectrum, 16(3), 287-327.
8.
Coy, P.G., Woehrle, L.M., & Maney, G.M. ( 2008a). Discursive legacies: The U.S. peace movement and ‘support the troops’. Social Problems55(2), 161-89.
9.
Coy, P.G., Woehrle, L.M., & Maney, G.M. ( 2008b). A typology of oppositional knowledge: Democracy and the U.S. peace movement. Sociological Research Online,13(4), available at http://www.socresonline.org.uk/13/4/3.html
10.
Einwohner, R.L. ( 1999). Gender, class, and social movement outcomes: Identity and effectiveness in two animal rights campaigns. Gender & Society, 13(1), 56-76.
11.
Gamson, W.A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 1-37.
12.
Glassner, B. ( 1999). The culture of fear: Why Americans are afraid of the wrong things. New York: Basic Books .
13.
Glassner, B. ( 2004). Narrative techniques of fear mongering. Social Research, 71(4), 819-826.
14.
Gramsci, A. ( 1971). Selections from prison notebooks. London: New Left Books.
15.
Gregg, R. ( 1966). The power of nonviolence. New York : Schocken Books. (Original work published 1935)
16.
Hertog, J.K., & McLeod, D.M. (1995). Anarchists wreak havoc in downtown Minneapolis: A multi-level study of media coverage of radical protest. Journalism & Mass Communication Monographs, 7(2), 91-109.
17.
Konty, M., Duell, B., & Joireman, J. ( 2004). Scared selfish: A culture of fear’s values in the age of terrorism. The American Sociologist, 35, 93-109.
18.
Ku, A.S. ( 2001). Hegemonic construction, negotiation and displacement: The struggle over right of abode in Hong Kong. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 4(3), 259-278.
19.
Maney, G.M., Coy, P.G., & Woehrle, L.M. ( 2009). Pursuing political persuasion: War and peace frames in the United States after September 11th. Social Movement Studies , 8(4).
20.
Maney, G.M., Woehrle, L.M., & Coy, P.G. ( 2005). Harnessing and challenging hegemony: The U.S. peace movement after 9/11. Sociological Perspectives, 38(3), 357-381.
21.
Mansbridge, J.J. ( 2001). The making of oppositional consciousness. In J. J. Mansbridge & A. D. Morris (Eds.), Oppositional consciousness: The subjective roots of social protest (pp. 1-19). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
Naples, N. ( 2002). Materialist feminist discourse analysis and social movement research: Mapping the changing context for "community control." In N. Whittier, D. S. Meyer , & B. Robnett (Eds.), Social movements: Identity, culture, and the state (pp. 226-246). New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
Neilson, J. ( 2004). Fertilizing Bush: Growing a great leader for difficult times. Cultural Logic: An Electronic Journal of Marxist Theory and Practice, 7. Retrieved June 12, 2009, from http://clogic.eserver.org/2004/neilson.html
24.
Oliver, P.E., & Maney, G.M. ( 2000). Political processes and local newspaper coverage of protest events: From selection bias to triadic interactions. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 463-505.
25.
Snow, D.A., & Benford, R.D. ( 1988). Ideology, frame resonance and participant mobilization . In B. Klandermans, H. Kriesi, & S. Tarrow (Eds.), International social movement research, volume 1 (pp. 197-217). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
26.
Snow, D.A., & Benford, R.D. ( 1992). Master frames and cycles of protest. In A. D. Morris & C. McClurg Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers of social movement theory (pp. 133-155). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
27.
Snow, D.A., & Corrigall-Brown, C. (2004). Why frames sometimes fall on deaf ears: The problems of misalignment, scope, exhaustion, and relevance . In D. Croteau, W. Hoynes, & C. Ryan (Eds.), Rhyming hope and history: Activists, academics, and social movement scholarship (pp. 222-238). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
28.
Steinberg, M.W. ( 1999). The talk and back talk of collective action: A dialogic analysis of repertoires of discourse in nineteenth-century English cotton spinners. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 736-780.
29.
Whittier, N. ( 2001). Emotional strategies: The collective reconstruction and display of oppositional emotions in the movement against child sexual abuse . In J. Goodwin, J. M. Jasper, & F. Polletta (Eds.), Passionate politics: Emotions and social movements (pp. 233-250). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
Williams, R. ( 1982). The sociology of culture. New York : Schocken Books.
31.
Woehrle, L.M., Coy, P.G., & Maney, G.M. ( 2008). Contesting patriotism: Culture, power and strategy in the peace movement. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
