Nonprofit organizations and the nonprofit sector more generally are part of a complex dual transition from industrial to postindustrial society and from national state to transnational policy regimes. This transition shows the beginnings of a new policy dialogue in addressing the future role of nonprofit organizations and involves three broad perspectives that have become prominent in recent years: First, nonprofits are increasingly part of new public management and a mixed economy of welfare; second, they are seen as central to “civil society—social capital” approaches, specifically the Neo-Tocquevillian emphasis on the nexus between social capital and participation in voluntary associations; and third, they are part of a wider social accountability perspective that sees them as instruments of greater transparency, heightened accountability, and improved governance of public institutions.
Anheier, H.K., & Kendell, J. (2002). Interpersonal trust and voluntary associations: Examining three approaches. British Journal of Sociology, 53(3), 343-362.
3.
Anheier, H.K., & Seibel, W. (2001). The nonprofit sector in Germany. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
4.
Archambault, E. (1996). The nonprofit sector in France. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
5.
Clark, J. (2003) Worlds apart: Civil society and the battle for ethical globalization. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian.
6.
Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
Edwards, B., Foley, M.W., & Diani, M. (2001). Beyond Tocqueville: Civil society and the social capital debate in comparative perspective. Lebanon, NHUniversity Press of New England.
8.
Edwards, M. (2004). Civil society. London: Polity.
9.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: Social virtues and the creation of prosperity . New York: Simon & Schuster .
11.
Gaventa, J. (2004). Towards participatory governance: Assessing the transformative possibilities, from tyranny to transformation. London: Zed Books.
12.
Giddens, A. (1999). The third way: The renewal of social democracy . Cambridge, UK: Polity.
13.
Glasius, M., Lewis, D. , & Seckinelgin, H. (Eds.). (2004). Exploring civil society: Political and cultural contexts. London: Routledge.
14.
Halman, L. (2001). The European Values Study: A third wave (Source Book of the 1999/2000 European Values Study Surveys). Tilburg, the Netherlands: Tilburg University Press .
15.
Halpern, D. (1999). Social capital: The new golden goose?London: Institute for Public Policy Research.
16.
Hansmann, H. (1987). Economic theories of non-profit organisations . In W. W. Powell (Ed.), The non-profit sector: A research handbook (pp. 27-42). New Haven, CT : Yale University Press.
17.
Hasenfeld, Y., & Gidron, B. (2005). Understanding multipurpose hybrid voluntary organizations . Journal of Civil Society, 1(2), 97-112.
18.
Hood, C. (1995) Contemporary public management: A new global paradigm ? Public Policy and Administration, 10(2), 104-117.
19.
Howell, J., & Pearce, J. (2001). Civil society and development: A critical exploration . Denver, CO: Lynne Rienner.
20.
James, E. (1987). The non-profit sector in comparative perspective . In W. W. Powell (Ed.), The non-profit sector: A research handbook (pp. 397-415). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
21.
Kaldor, M. (2003). Civil society and accountability. Journal of Human Development, 4(1), 5-26.
22.
Kettl, D.F. (2000). The global public management revolution: A report on the transformation of governance. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
23.
Koppell, J. (2005). Pathologies of accountability: ICANN and the challenge of multiple accountabilities disorder. Public Administration Review, 65(1), 94-108.
24.
Korten, D. (1990). Getting to the 21st century: Voluntary action and the global agenda. Hartford, CT: Kumarian.
25.
Le Grand, J. (1999). Competition, collaboration or control? Tales from the British National Health Service. Health Affairs, 18, 27-37.
26.
Malena, C., Forster, R., & Singh, J. (2004). Social accountability: An introduction to the concept and emerging practice (Social Development Paper No. 76). Washington, DC: World Bank.
27.
McLaughlin, K., Osborne, S. P., & Ferlie, E. (Eds.). (2002). New public management: Current trends and future prospects. London: Routledge.
28.
Milner, H. (2002). Civic literacy. Lebanon, NHUniversity of New England Press.
29.
Mulgan, G. (1999). Government and the third sector: Building a more equal partnership. In H. K. Anheier (Ed.), Third way-Third sector (Report No. 1, pp. 17-22). London: Centre for Civil Society, London School of Economics.
30.
Offe, C., & Fuchs, S. (2002). A decline of social capital? The German case. In R. D. Putnam (Ed.), Democracies in flux: The evolution of social capital in contemporary society (pp. 189-244). New York: Oxford University Press.
31.
Perrow, C. (2001). The rise of nonprofits and the decline of civil society. In H. Anheier (Ed.), Organisational theory and the non-profit form (Centre for Civil Society Report No. 2, pp. 22-28). London: London School of Economics.
32.
Plowden, W. (2001). Next steps in voluntary action. London: Centre for Civil Society, London School of Economics and National Council for Voluntary Organizations.
33.
Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone. New York: Simon & Schuster.
34.
Putnam, R. (Ed.). (2002). Democracies in flux. New York: Oxford University Press.
35.
Putnam, R., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36.
Salamon, L.M. (1995). Partners in public service: Government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
37.
Schuppert, G.F. (2003). Gemeinwohlverantwortung und Staatsverständnis . In H. K. Anheier & V. Then (Eds.), Zwischen Eigennutz und Gemeinwohl: Neue Formen und Wege der Gemeinnützigkeit (pp. 25-60). Gütersloh , Germany: Bertelsmann.
38.
Seibel, W. (1994). Funktionaler Dilettantismus: Erfolgreich scheiternde Organisationen im "Dritten Sektor" zwischen Markt und Staat. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.
39.
Skocpol, T. (2002). From membership to advocacy. In R. Putnam (Ed.), Democracies in flux (pp. 103-136). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
40.
Strategy Unit. (2002). Private action, public benefit: A review of charities and the wider not-for-profit sector. London: Cabinet Office.
41.
United Nations Development Programme. (2002 ) Human Development Report. New York: Author.
42.
Weisbrod, B.A. (1988). The non-profit economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43.
Wollebeck, D., & Selle, P. (2007). Origins of social capital: Socialization and institutionalization approaches compared. Journal of Civil Society, 3(1), 1-25.
44.
World Bank. (2002). Understanding and measuring social capital: A multidisciplinary tool for practitioners. Washington, DC: Author.
45.
World Bank. (2004). Social accountability: An introduction to the concept and emerging practice (Social development papers) . Washington, DC: Author.
46.
Wuthnow, R. (2002). Bridging the privileged and the marginalized. In R. Putnam (Ed.), Democracies in flux (pp. 59-102). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
