The authors tested the limitations of paternalism as an explanation for the third-person effect's behavioral aspect, suggesting that the theory of reasoned action better explains why people are sometimes motivated to act on the third-person effect. This study (N = 600) revealed that the third-person effect can motivate people toward socially desirable action that is not corrective in nature, supporting the theory of reasoned action as a theoretical basis for the behavioral aspect of the third-person effect.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1969). The prediction of behavioral intentions in a choice situation. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 5, 400-416.
2.
Banning, S.A. (2001). Do you see what I see? Third-person effects on public communication through self-esteem, social stigma, and product use. Mass Communication & Society, 4(2), 127-147.
3.
Becker, E.A., & Gibson, C.C. (1998). Fishbein and Ajzen's theory of reasoned action: Accurate prediction of behavioral intentions for enrolling in distance education courses. Adult Education Quarterly, 49(1), 43-55.
4.
Chia, S.C., Lu, K., & McLeod, D.M. (2004). Sex, lies and video compact disc: A case study on third-person perception and motivations for censorship . Communication Research, 31(1), 109-130.
5.
Davison, W.P. (1983). The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47(1), 1-15.
6.
Duck, J.M., & Mullin, B.A. (1995). The perceived impact of the mass media: Reconsidering the third-person effect. European Journal of Social Psychology , 25(1), 77-93.
7.
Duck, J.M., Terry, D.J., & Hogg, M.A. (1995). The perceived influence of AIDS advertising: Third-person effects in the context of positive media content. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17(3), 305-325.
8.
Eveland, W.P., Jr., Nathanson, A.I., Detenber, B.H., & McLeod, D.M. (1999). Rethinking the social distance corollary: Perceived likelihood of exposure and the third-person perception . Communication Research, 26(3), 275-302.
9.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
10.
Golan, G. (2002). Religiosity and the third-person effect. Journal of Media and Religion, 1(2), 105-120.
11.
Gunther, A. (1995). Overrating the X-rating: The third-person perception and support for censorship of pornography. Journal of Communication , 45(1), 27-38.
12.
Gunther, A.C., & Mundy, P. (1993). Biased optimism and the third-person effect. Journalism Quarterly, 70(1), 58-67.
13.
Gunther, A.C., & Storey, J.D. (2003). The influence of presumed influence. Journal of Communication, 53(2), 199-215.
14.
Gunther, A.C., & Thorson, E. (1992). Perceived persuasive effects of commercials and public service announcements: The third-person effect in new domains. Communication Research, 19, 574-596.
15.
Hoffner, C., Buchanan, M., Anderson, J., Hubbs, L., Kamigaki, S., Kowalczyk, L., et al. (1999). Support for censorship of television violence . Communication Research, 26(6), 726-742.
16.
Huh, J., DeLorme, D., & Reid, L.N. (2004). The third-person effect and its influence on behavioral outcomes in a product advertising context: The case of direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertising. Communication Research, 31(5), 568-599.
17.
Innes, J.M., & Zeitz, H. (1988). The public's view of the impact of the mass media: A test of the "thirdperson" effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(5), 457-463.
18.
Jensen, J.D., & Hurley, R.J. (2005). Third-person effects and the environment: Social distance, social desirability and presumed behavior. Journal of Communication, 55(2), 242-256.
19.
Lambe, J.L., & McLeod, D.M. (2005). Understanding third-person perception processes: Predicting perceived impact on self and others for multiple expressive contexts. Journal of Communication, 55(2), 277-291.
20.
Lee, B., & Tamborini, R. (2005). Third person effect and Internet pornography: The influence of collectivism and self efficacy. Journal of Communication, 55(2), 292-310.
21.
Lo, V., & Wei, R. (2002). Third-person effect, gender, and pornography on the Internet. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media , 46(1), 13-33.
22.
McLeod, D.M., Detenber, B.H., & Eveland, W.P., Jr. (2001). Behind the third-person effect: Differentiating perceptual processes for self and other. Journal of Communication, 51(4), 678-695.
23.
McLeod, D.M., Eveland, W.P., Jr., & Nathanson, A.I. (1997). Support for censorship of violent and misogynic rap lyrics: An analysis of the third-person effect . Communication Research, 24(2), 153-174.
24.
Nathanson, A.I., Eveland, W.P., Jr., Park, H., & Paul, B. (2002). Perceived media influence and efficacy as predictors of caregivers' protective behaviors. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46(3), 385-410.
25.
Neuwirth, K., Frederick, E., & Mayo, C. (2002). Person-effects and heuristic-systematic processing . Communication Research, 29(3), 320-359.
26.
Ognianova, E., Meeds, R., Thorson, E., & Coyle, J. (1996, August). Political adwatches and the third-person effect. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Anaheim, CA.
27.
Paul, B., Salwen, M.B., & Dupagne, M. (2000). The third-person effect: A meta-analysis of the perceptual hypothesis. Mass Communication & Society, 3(1), 57-85.
28.
Perloff, R.M. (1999). The third-person effect: A critical review and synthesis. Media Psychology, 1(4), 353-378.
29.
Price, V., Tewksbury, D., & Huang, L. (1998). Third-person effects on publication of a Holocaust-denial advertisement. Journal of Communication, 48(2), 3-26.
30.
Pryor, B.W. (1990). Predicting and explaining intentions to participate in continuing education: An application of the theory of reasoned action. Adult Education Quarterly, 40, 146-157.
31.
Ray, R.O. (1981). Examining motivation to participate in continuing education: An investigation of recreation professionals. Journal of Leisure Research, 1, 66-75.
32.
Rojas, H., Shah, D.V., & Faber, R.J. (1996). For the good of others: Censorship and the third-person effect. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8(2), 163-186.
33.
Rucinski, D., & Salmon, C.T. (1990). The "other" as the vulnerable voter: A study of the third-person effect in the 1988 U.S. presidential campaign. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 2, 345-368.
34.
Salwen, M.B., & Driscoll, P.D. (1997). Consequences of third-person perception in support of press restrictions in the O.J. Simpson trial. Journal of Communication, 47(2), 60-78.
35.
Salwen, M.B., & Dupagne, M. (1999). The third-person effect: Perceptions of the media's influence and immoral consequences. Communication Research , 26(5), 523-550.
36.
Shah, D.V., Faber, R.J., & Youn, S. (1999). Susceptibility and severity: Perceptual dimensions underlying the third-person effect. Communication Research , 26(2), 240-267.
37.
Yang, B., Blunt, A., & Butler, R.S. (1994). Prediction of participation in continuing professional education: A test of two behavioral intention models. Adult Education Quarterly, 44, 83-96.
38.
Youn, S., Faber, R.J., & Shah, D.V. (2000). Restricting gambling advertising and the third-person effect. Psychology and Marketing, 17(7), 633-649.
