This article provides concluding remarks to the journal issue and reaffirms the viability of the scientist-practitioner training model as effective and essential for this dynamic discipline of psychology. The skills developed in science and practice and applications to practice are considered invaluable for professional psychology.
Belar, C. D., & Perry, N. W. (1992). National conference on scientist-practitioner education and training for the professional practice of psychology. American Psychologist, 47, 71-75.
2.
Gelso, C. J. (1993). On the making of a scientist-practitioner: A theory of research training in professional psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 24, 468-476.
3.
Hagstrom, R. P., Fry, M. K., Cramblet, L. D., & Tanner, K. (2007). Educational psychologists as scientist-practitioners: An expansion of the meaning of a scientist-practitioner. American Behavioral Scientist, 50(6), 797-807.
4.
Horn, R. A., McGowan, M. R., Mitchell, D. R., Mellott, R. N., Lilly, K., & Martinez, L. (2007). A pilot study examining the longer term stability of the scientist-practitioner model of training. American Behavioral Scientist, 50(6), 830-841.
5.
Horn, R. A., Troyer, J. A., Hall, E. J., Mellott, R. N., Cotè, L. S., & Marquis, J. D. (2007). The scientist-practitioner model: A rose by any other name is still a rose. American Behavioral Scientist, 50(6), 808-819.
6.
Leong, F. T. L., & Zachar, P. (1991). Development and validation of the Scientist-Practitioner Inventory for psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 331-341.
7.
Martin, W. E., Jr., Gavin, M., Baker, E., & Bridgmon, K. (2007). Analysis of the effects of gender and doctoral program emphasis on scientist and practitioner interests. American Behavioral Scientist, 50(6), 820-829.
8.
Stricker, G. (2000). The scientist-practitioner model: Gandhi was right again. American Psychologist, 55, 253-254.
