Charles Taylor recently used the term modern social imaginary to describe dominant sets of norms, practices, and expectations—such as the market economy or the public sphere—that are rooted in the philosophies of the European Enlightenment and have since permeated the common experience of life in the contemporary Western world. Building on Taylor’s argument, this article charts how Mary Wollstonecraft became one of the major philosophical sources from the Enlightenment era to shape the emergent modern social imaginary of the egalitarian family that increasingly serves as the background against which debates about the family take place today.
Abbey, R. (1999). Back to the future: Marriage as friendship in the thought of Mary Wollstonecraft. Hypatia, 14, 78-95.
2.
Anderson, B. S. (2000). Joyous greetings: The first international women’s rights movement, 1830-1860. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
3.
Blum, C. (1986). Rousseau and the republic of virtue. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
4.
Botting, E. H., & Carey, C. (2004). Wollstonecraft’s philosophical impact on nineteenth-century American women’s rights advocates. American Journal of Political Science, 48, 707-722.
5.
Brown, C. M. (1995). Mary Wollstonecraft, or the female illuminati: The campaign against women and “modern philosophy” in the early republic. Journal of the Early Republic, 15, 389-424.
6.
Burke, E. (1869). The first letter on a regicide peace. In The works of the Right Honorable Edmund Burke (Vol. 5, pp. 233-341). Boston: Little, Brown.
7.
Burke, E. (1986). Reflections on the revolution in France (C. C. O’Brien, Ed.). New York: Penguin Books.
8.
Caine, B. (1997a). English feminism, 1780-1980. New York: Oxford University Press.
9.
Caine, B. (1997b). Victorian feminism and the ghost of Mary Wollstonecraft. Women’s Writing, 4, 261-275.
10.
Crocker, H. M. (1818). Observations on the real rights of women, with their appropriate duties, agreeable to scripture, reason and common sense. Boston: Printed for the author.
11.
Daley, C., & Nolan, M. (1994). International feminist perspectives on suffrage: An introduction. In C. Daley & M. Nolan (Eds.), Suffrage and beyond: International feminist perspectives (pp. 1-22). New York: New York University Press.
12.
Eckhardt, C. (1984). Fanny Wright: Rebel in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
Fuller, M. (1941). Woman in the nineteenth century. In M. Wade (Ed.), The writings of Margaret Fuller (pp. 110-218). New York: Viking Press.
14.
Gilman, C. P. (1991). The living of Charlotte Perkins Gilman, an autobiography. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
15.
Godwin, W. (1987). Memoirs of the author of A vindication of the rights of woman. In R. Holmes (Ed.), A short residence in Sweden and Memoirs of the author of “The rights of woman” (pp. 203-277). London: Penguin.
16.
Grimké, S. (1988). Letters on the equality of the sexes. In E. A. Bartlett (Ed.), Letters on the equality of the sexes and other essays (pp. 31-103). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
17.
Grimshaw, P. (1987). Women’s suffrage in New Zealand. Auckland, New Zealand: Auckland University Press.
18.
Habermas, J. (1999). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society (T. Burger & F. Lawrence, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19.
James, L. (1990). Men, women and Margaret Fuller. New York: Golden Heritage Press.
20.
Janes, R. M. (1988). On the reception of Mary Wollstonecraft’s A vindication of the rights of woman. Journal of the History of Ideas, 39(2), 293-302.
21.
Kant, I. (1981). Duties towards the body in respect of sexual impulse (L. Infield, Trans.). In J. Arthur (Ed.), Morality and moral controversies (pp. 80-84). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
22.
Kant, I. (1991). An answer to the question: “What is enlightenment?” (H. B. Nisbet, Trans.). In H. Reiss (Ed.), Kant: Political writings (pp. 54-60). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Keohane, N. O., & Gelpi, B. C. (1982). Forward. In N. O. Keohane, B. C. Gelpi, & M. Z. Rosaldo (Eds.), Feminist theory: A critique of ideology (pp. vii-xii). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
Kerber, L. (1976). The republican mother: Women and the Enlightenment—An American perspective. American Quarterly, 28, 187-205.
25.
Kitts, S. (1995). The debate on the nature, role and influence of woman in eighteenth-century Spain. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.
26.
Locke, J. (1988). Two treatises of government (P. Laslett, Ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Marso, L. J. (2003). A feminist search for love: Emma Goldman on the politics of marriage, love, sexuality and feminism. Feminist Theory, 4, 305-320.
28.
Mellor, A. (2002). Mary Wollstonecraft’s A vindication of the rights of woman and the woman writers of her day. In C. Johnson (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Mary Wollstonecraft (pp. 141-159). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Mott, L. (2002). Selected Letters of Lucretia Coffin Mott (B. W. Palmer, Ed.). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
30.
Rousseau, J. (1979). Emile, or on education (A. Bloom, Trans.) New York: Basic Books.
31.
Rousseau, J. (1997). Discourse on political economy. In The social contract and other later political writings (V. Gourevitch, Trans., pp. 3-38). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Sapiro, V. (1992). A vindication of political virtue: The political theory of Mary Wollstonecraft. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33.
Shanley, M. (1979). Marriage contract and social contract in seventeenth-century English political thought. The Western Political Quarterly, 32, 79-91.
34.
Stanton, E. C., & Anthony, S. B. (1991). The revolution. In P. G. Holland & A. D. Gordon (Eds.), The papers of Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony (Microfilm, Series 1, Rolls 1-2). Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources.
35.
Stanton, E. C., Anthony, S. B., & Gage, M. J. (1889). History of woman suffrage, Volume I, 1848-1861. Rochester, NY: Charles Mann.
36.
Taylor, C. (2004). Modern social imaginaries. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
37.
Thiébaux, M. (1978). Mary Wollstonecraft in federalist America, 1791-1802. In D. H. Reiman, M. C. Jaye, & B. T. Bennett (Eds.), The evidence of imagination: Studies of interactions between life and art in English romantic literature (pp. 195-228). New York: New York University Press.
38.
Thompson, W. (1983). Appeal of one half the human race, women, against the pretensions of the other half, men, to retain them in political, and thence in civil and domestic slavery. London: Virago.
39.
Windle, J. (2000). Mary Wollstonecraft Godwin, 1759-1797: A bibliography of the first and early editions (K. Pippin, Ed.). New Castle, DE: Oak Knoll Press.
40.
Wollstonecraft, M. (1995). A vindication of the rights of woman. In S. Tomaselli (Ed.), A vindication of the rights of men and a vindication of the rights of woman (pp. 65-294). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
41.
Wollstonecraft, M. (2004). Mary, a fiction. In J. Todd (Ed.), Mary, Maria, and Matilda (pp. 1-53). London: Penguin.
42.
Woolf, V. (1932). The second common reader. New York: Harcourt Brace.
43.
Woolf, V. (1988). A room of one’s own. In M. Shiach (Ed.), A room of one’s own and Three guineas (pp. 1-149). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
