As recently as 5 years ago, Web users were being advised to gauge Web site credibility by examining author credentials and expertise. Recent research shows, however, that users instead rely on a combination of factors such as design look, site structure, and usefulness of information when they judge Web sites. This article argues that this reliance on distributed credibility may be appropriate in a Web environment where authorship, credentials, and information sources are often not readily available for examination.
Alexander, J., & Tate, M. A. (1996). Evaluating Web resources. Retrieved August 27, 2003, from http://www2.widener.edu/Wolfgram-Memorial-Library/webevaluation/webeval.htm
2.
Barthes, R. (1977). Image music text. New York: Noonday Press.
3.
Bruce, B. C. (2000). Credibility of the Web: Why we need dialectical reading. Journal of the Philosophy of Education, 34(1), 97-109.
4.
Burbules, N. C. (2001). Paradoxes of the Web: The ethical dimensions of credibility. Library Trends, 49(3), 441-441. Retrieved August 29, 2003, from Proquest database.
5.
Eysenbach, G., Powell, J., Kuss, O, & Sa, E.-R. (2002). Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the World Wide Web: A systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Association, 287(20), 2961-2961. Retrieved August 26, 2003, from Expanded Academic Index.
6.
Fogg, B. J., Soohoo, C., & Danielson, D. (2002). How do people evaluate a Web site’s credibility? Result from a large study. Retrieved August 27, 2003, from Stanford Persuasive Technology Lab on Consumer Web Watch site http://www.consumerwebwatch.org/news/report3_credibilityresearch/stanfordPTL_abstract.htm
7.
Fritch, J. W., & Cromwell, R. L. (2001). Evaluating Internet resources: Identity, affiliation, and cognitive authority in a networked world. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(6), 499-507.
8.
Harris, R. (1997, November 17). Evaluating Internet research sources. Retrieved August 27, 2003, from http://virtualsalt.com/evalu8it.htm
9.
Kennedy, G. A. (1991). Aristotle on rhetoric: A theory of civic discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
10.
Lynch, D., Vernon, R. F., & Smith, M. L. (2001). Critical thinking and the Web. Journal of Social Work Education, 37(2), 381-381. Retrieved August 26, 2003, from the Expanded Academic Index.
11.
Princeton Survey Research Associates. (2002, January). A matter of trust: What users want from Web sites. Results of a national survey of Internet users for Consumer WebWatch. Retrieved September 9, 2003, from http://www.consumerwebwatch.org/news/report1.pdf
12.
Rabinow, P. (Ed.). (1984). The Foucault reader. New York: Pantheon.
13.
Sweetland, J. H. (2000). Reviewing the World Wide Web—Theory versus reality. Library Trends, 48(4), 748-768.
14.
Toulmin, S. E. (1969). The uses of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Wilkinson, G. L., Oliver, K. M., & Bennett, L. T. (1997). Evaluating the quality of Internet information sources. Retrieved September 12, 2003, from http://it2.coe.uga.edu/Faculty/gwilkinson/webeval.html
