In this article, the authors develop a definition of positive deviance, a foundational construct in positive organizational scholarship. They offer a normative definition of positive deviance: intentional behaviors that depart from the norms of a referent group in honorable ways. The authors contrast this normative perspective on deviance with statistical, supra conformity, and reactive perspectives on deviance. They also develop research propositions that differentiate positive deviance from related prosocial types of behaviors, including organizational citizenship, whistle-blowing, corporate social responsibility, and creativity/innovation. Finally, the authors offer some initial ideas on how to operationalize positive deviance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 123-167). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
2.
Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 349-360.
3.
Ben-Yehuda, N. (1990). Positive and negative deviance: More fuel for a controversy. Deviant Behavior, 11(3), 221-243.
4.
Bollier, D. (1996). Aiming higher: 25 stories of how companies prosper by combining sound management and social vision. New York: AMACOM.
5.
Brief, A. P., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1986). Prosocial organizational behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 710-725.
6.
Brown, B., & Perry, S. (1995a). Halo-removed residuals of Fortune’s “responsibility to the community and environment”—A decade of data. Business and Society, 34(2), 199.
7.
Brown, B., & Perry, S. (1995b). Some additional thoughts on halo-removed Fortune residuals. Business and Society, 34(2), 236.
8.
Business Enterprise Trust. (1991). Merck & Co., Inc. In T. Donaldson & P. Werhane (Eds.), Ethical issues in business: A philosophical approach (5th ed., pp. 215-220). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
9.
Cameron, K., Dutton, J., & Quinn, R. (Eds.). (2003). Positive organizational scholarship. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
10.
Clinard, M. B., & Meier, R. F. (2001). Sociology of deviant behavior (11 ed.). Fort Worth: Harcourt.
11.
Dodge, D. (1985). The over-negativized conceptualization of deviance: A programmatic exploration. Deviant Behavior, 6(1), 17-37.
12.
Drazin, R., Glynn, M. A., & Kazanjian, R. K. (1999). Multilevel theorizing about creativity in organizations: A sense making perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24, 286-307.
13.
Dutton, J., & Pratt, M. G. (1997). Merck & Company: From core competence to global community involvement. In N. M. Tichy, A. R. McGill, & L. St. Clair (Eds.), Corporate global citizenship: Doing business in the public eye (pp. 150-168). San Francisco: New Lexington.
14.
Dworkin, T. M., & Baucus, M. S. (1998). Internal vs. external whistleblowers: A comparison of whistleblowing processes. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(12), 1281-1299.
15.
Elangovan, A. R., & Shapiro, D. (1998). Betrayal of trust in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 547-566.
16.
Etzioni, A. (1988). The moral dimension: Toward a new economics. New York: Free Press.
17.
Ewald, K., & Jiobu, R. M. (1985). Explaining positive deviance: Becker’s model and the case of runners and bodybuilders. Sociology of Sport, 2, 144-156.
18.
Ford, C. M. (1996). A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. Academy of Management Review, 21, 1112-1142.
19.
Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
20.
Goode, E. (1991). Positive deviance: A viable concept. Deviant Behavior, 12(3), 289-309.
21.
Graves, S. B., & Waddock, S. A. (1994). Institutional owners and corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 1034.
22.
Heckert, D. M. (1989). The relativity of positive deviance: The case of the French Impressionists. Deviant Behavior, 10(2), 131-144.
23.
Heckert, D. M. (1998). Positive deviance: A classificatory model. Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology, 26(1), 23-30.
24.
Hughes, R., & Coakley, J. (1991). Positive deviance among athletes: The implications of over conformity to the sport ethic. Sociology of Sport Journal, 8, 307-325.
25.
Jones, A. L. (1998). Random acts of kindness: A teaching tool for positive deviance. Teaching Sociology, 26, 179-188.
26.
Jubb, P. B. (1999). Whistleblowing: A restrictive definition and interpretation. Journal of Business Ethics, 21(1), 77-95.
27.
Kant, I. (1993). Grounding for the metaphysics of morals. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
28.
Lee, K., & Allen, N. J. (2002, February). Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 18(1), 131.
29.
LePine, J. A., Erez, A., & Johnson, D. E. (2002). The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 52-65.
30.
Logsdon, J. M., & Wartick, S. L. (1995). Theoretically based applications and implications for using the Brown and Perry database. Business and Society, 34(2), 222-228.
31.
Merton, R. K. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3, 673-682.
32.
Moir, L. (2001). What do we mean by social responsibility? Corporate Governance, 1(2), 16-22.
33.
Near, J. P., & Miceli, M. P. (1985). Organizational dissidence: The case of whistle-blowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 4(1), 1-16.
34.
Norland, S., Hepburn, J. R., & Monette, D. (1977). The effects of labeling and consistent differentiation on the construction of positive deviance. Sociology and Social Research, 61, 83-95.
35.
Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Review, 39, 607-634.
36.
O’Reilly, C. A., & Chatman, J. A. (1996). Culture as social control: Corporations, cult and commitment. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 157-200.
37.
Quinn, R. E. (1996). Deep change: Discovering the leader within. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
38.
Quinn, R. E., & Quinn, G. (2002). Letters to Garrett: Stories of change, power and possibility. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
39.
Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 555-572.
40.
Sagarin, E. (1975). Deviants and deviance: An introduction to the study of disvalued people. New York: Praegar.
41.
Sagarin, E. (1985). Positive deviance: An oxymoron. Deviant Behavior, 6(1), 169-181.
42.
Scull, A. T. (1988). Deviance and social control. In N. Smelser (Ed.), Handbook of sociology (pp. 667-693). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
43.
Sodeman, W. A. (1995). Advantages and disadvantages of using the Brown and Perry database. Business and Society, 34(2), 216.
44.
Spreitzer, G. M., & Sonenshein, S. (2003). Positive deviance and extraordinary organizing. In K. Cameron, J. Dutton, & R. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship (pp. 207-224). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
45.
Van Dyne, L., Cummings, L. L., & Parks, M. J. (1995). Extra-role behaviors: In pursuit of construct and definitional clarity. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 215-285). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
46.
Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 109-119.
47.
Warren, D. (2003). Constructive and destructive deviance in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 28622-632.
48.
Whyte, W. F. (1943). Street corner society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49.
Wood, D. J. (1995). The Fortune database as a CSP measure. Business and Society, 34(2), 197-198.
