In this article, the authors present the case for field experimentationin social psychology primarily by describing a program of research concerned with psychological aspects of health communication and persuasion. In particular, the authors are most interested in when and for whom are messages emphasizing the benefits of a health behavior (these are called gain-framed messages) more persuasive and motivating than messages emphasizing the costs of not engagingin a behavior(these are called loss-framed messages), andvice-versa. This line of research is as theoretically driven as most laboratory investigations in social psychology, and it involves experimental approaches with random assignment, control groups, and the like. However, most of this work recruits participants in ecologically interesting contexts such as community clinics and housing developments. These especially vulnerable individuals are followed for sufficient periods of time to allow for the assessment of the influence of these health messages on relevant health behaviors such as obtaining a mammogram or acquiring condoms.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Apanovitch, A. M., McCarthy, D., & Salovey, P. (2003). Using message framing to motivate HIV testing among low-income, ethnic minority women. Health Psychology, 22, 60-67.
2.
Argyris, C., Putnam, R., & McLain, D. (1985). Action science. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3.
Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., & Brewer, M. B. (1998). Experimentation in social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 99-142). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
4.
Banks, S. M., Salovey, P., Greener, S., Rothman, A. J., Moyer, A., Beauvais, J., et al. (1995). The effects of message framing on mammography utilization. Health Psychology, 14, 178-184.
5.
Christophersen, E. R., & Gyulay, J. E. (1981). Parental compliance with car seat usage: A positive approach with long term follow-up. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 6, 301-312.
6.
Detweiler, J. B., Bedell, B. T., Salovey, P., Pronin,E., & Rothman,A. J. (1999).Message framingand sunscreen use: Gain-framed messages motivate beach-goers. Health Psychology, 18, 189-196.
7.
Gilbert, D. T., & Hixon, J. G. (1991). The trouble of thinking: Activation and application of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 509-517.
8.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-292.
9.
Kahneman,D., & Tversky, A. (1982).The psychology of preferences. Scientific American, 247, 160-173.
10.
Kalichman, S. C., & Coley, B. (1995). Context framing to enhance HIV-antibody-testing messages targeted to African American women. Health Psychology, 14, 247-254.
11.
Levin, I. P., Schnittjer, S. K., & Thee, S. L. (1988).Informationframing effects in social and personal decisions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 520-529.
12.
Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2, 34-46.
13.
Linville, P. W., Fischer, G. W., & Fischhoff, B. (1993). AIDS risk perceptions and decision biases. In J. B. Pryor & G. D. Reeder (Eds.), The social psychology of HIV infection (pp. 421-432). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
Marteau, T. M. (1989). Framing of information: Its influence upon decisions of doctors and patients. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 89-94.
15.
McGuire, W. J. (1969). Theory-oriented research in natural settings: The best of both worlds for social psychology. In M. Sherif & C. W. Sherif (Eds.), Interdisciplinary relationships in the social sciences (pp. 21-51). Chicago: Aldine.
16.
McNeil, B. J., Pauker, S. G., Sox, H. C., & Tversky, A. (1982). On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. New England Journal of Medicine, 306, 1259-1262.
17.
Meyerowitz, B. E., & Chaiken, S. (1987). The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 500-510.
18.
Prochaska, J. O., DiClemente, C. C., & Norcross, J. C. (1992). In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors. American Psychologist, 47, 1102-1114.
19.
Rivers, S. E., Pizarro, D. A., Schneider, T. R., Pizarro, J., & Salovey, P. (2003). Message framing and paptest utilization among women attending a community health clinic. Manuscriptsubmittedfor publication.
20.
Robberson, M. R., & Rogers, R. W. (1988). Beyond fear appeals: Negative and positive persuasive appeals to health and self-esteem. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13, 277-287.
21.
Rothman, A. J., Martino, S. C., Bedell, B. T., Detweiler, J. B., & Salovey, P. (1999). The systematic influence of gain-and loss-framed messages on interest in and use of different types of health behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1355-1369.
22.
Rothman, A. J., & Salovey, P. (1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 3-19.
23.
Rothman, A. J., Salovey, P., Antone, C., Keough, K., & Martin, C. (1993). The influence of message framing on health behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 408-433.
24.
Sadava, S. W. (1997). Applied social psychology: An introduction. In S. W. Sadava & D. R. McCreary (Eds.), Applied social psychology (pp. 1-9). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
25.
Salovey, P., Rothman, A. J., & Rodin, J. (1998). Health behavior. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 633-683). New York: McGraw-Hill.
26.
Schneider, T. R., Salovey, P., Apanovitch, A. M., Pizarro, J., McCarthy, D., Zullo, J., et al. (2001). The effects of message framing and ethnic targeting on mammography use among low-income women. Health Psychology, 20, 256-266.
27.
Schneider, T. R., Salovey, P., Pallonen, U., Mundorf, N., Smith, N. F., & Steward, W. T. (2001). Visual and auditory message framing effects on tobacco smoking. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 667-682.
28.
Taylor, S. E. (1984). The developing field of health psychology. In A. Baum, S. E. Taylor, & J. E. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of psychology and health (Vol. 4, pp. 1-22). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29.
Treiber, F. A. (1986). A comparison of positive and negative consequences approaches upon car restraint usage. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 11, 15-24.
30.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.
31.
Wilson, D. K., Kaplan, R. M., & Schneiderman, L. (1987). Framing of decisions and selections of alternatives in health care. Social Behavior, 2, 51-59.
32.
Wilson, D. K., Purdon S. E., & Wallston, K. A. (1988). Compliance to health recommendations: A theoretical overview of message framing. Health Education Research: Theory and Practice, 3, 161-171.
