This article focuses on explicitly expanding contemporary definitions of the academic community and its disciplines, in particular academic psychology, to include virtue. The academy benefits from the civic trust; thus, it has moral obligations to serve the public with integrity and respect. This article places academic psychology in this larger context of the academy and uses the metaphor of the academic conversation for describing tensions between coherence and uncertainty indicative of academic life. Four major virtues of academic psychology that derive from its goals, practices, and distinguishing features are suggested: the self-regarding virtues of prudence and integrity and the other-regarding virtues of respectfulness and benevolence. Several challenges to achieving a virtuous academic psychology are presented. The ideas in this article are not meant to be definitive but rather are intended to provoke further conversation about these matters and their helpfulness in enhancing competent psychological research, instruction, practice, and policy making.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Albee, G. W. (1977). The uncertain future of the MA clinical psychologist. Professional Psychology, 8, 122-124.
2.
Albee, G. W. (2002). Exploring a controversy. American Psychologist, 57, 161-164.
3.
American Psychological Association. (APA). (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57, 1060-1073.
4.
American Psychological Association, Committee on Accreditation. (1999). Guidelines and principles for accreditation of programs in professional psychology. Washington, DC: Author.
5.
American Psychological Association, Office of Ethnic Minority Affairs. (1993). Guidelines for providers of psychological services to ethnic, linguistic, and culturally diverse populations. American Psychologist, 48, 45-48.
6.
Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (1994). Principles of biomedical ethics (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
7.
Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2001). Principles of biomedical ethics (5th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
8.
Bennett, J. B. (1998). Collegial professionalism: The academy, individualism and the common good. Phoenix, AZ: American Council on Education and Oryx Press.
9.
Bersoff, D. N. (1996). The virtue of principle ethics. The Counseling Psychologist, 24, 86-91.
10.
Blum, D. (2002). Love at Goon Park: Harry Harlow and the science of affection. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.
11.
Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
12.
Case, L., & Smith, T. B. (2000). Ethnic representation in a sample of the literature of applied psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 1107-1110.
13.
Clark, K. B. (1954). Some principles related to the problem of desegregation. Journal of Negro Education, 23, 339-347.
14.
Clark, K. B. (1988). The Brown decision: Racism, education and human values. Journal of Negro Education, 57, 125-132.
15.
Clark, K. B., & Clark, M. P. (1950). Emotional factors in racial identification and preference in Negro children. Journal of Negro Education, 19, 341-350.
16.
Council of Medical Specialty Societies. (1998, April). Consensus statement on the ethic of medicine. Lake Bluff, IL: Author. Retrieved July 23, 1999, from http://www.cmss.org
17.
Dewsbury, D. A. (Ed.). (1996-2000). Unification through division: Histories of the divisions of the American Psychological Association (Vols. 1-6). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
18.
Drane, J. F. (1994). Character and the moral life: A virtue approach to biomedical ethics. In E. R. DuBose, R. P. Hamel, & L. J. O’Connell (Eds.), A matter of principles? Ferment in U. S. bioethics (pp. 284-309). Valley Forge, PA: Trinity Press International.
19.
Dykstra, C. (1981). Vision and character: A Christian educator’s alternative to Kohlberg. New York: Paulist.
20.
Fisher, C. B., Hoagwood, K., Boyce, C., Duster, T., Frank, D. A., Grisso, T., et al. (2002). Research ethics for mental health science involving ethnic minority children and youths. American Psychologist, 57, 1024-1040.
21.
Frankena, W. K. (1973). Ethics (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
22.
Garrison, E. G., & Kobor, P. C. (2002). Weathering a political storm: A contextual perspective on a psychological research controversy. American Psychologist, 57, 165-175.
23.
Haslam, N., & Baron, J. (1994). Intelligence, personality and prudence. In R. J. Sternberg & P. Ruzgis (Eds.), Personality and intelligence (pp. 32-58). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Hauerwas, S. (1981). A community of character. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
25.
Hilgard, E. R. (1987). Psychology in America: A historical survey. San Diego, CA: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
26.
Howard, G. S., Hill, T. L., Maxwell, S. E., Baptista, T. M., Farias, M. H., Coelho, C., et al. (2003). What’s wrong with research literatures? And how to make them right. Manuscript submitted for publication.
27.
Reprinted in A. E. Kazdin (Ed.), Methodological issues and strategies in clinical research (3rd ed., pp. 465-492). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
28.
Ibrahim, F. A. (1996). A multicultural perspective on principle and virtue ethics. The Counseling Psychologist, 24, 78-85.
29.
Jordan, A. E., & Meara, N. M. (1990). Ethics and the professional practice of psychologists. Professional Psychology, 21, 107-114.
30.
Kendler, H. H. (1999). The role of value in the world of psychology. American Psychologist, 54, 828-835.
31.
Kendler, H. H. (2000). Let’s be realistic American Psychologist, 55, 1154-1155.
32.
Kitchener, K. S. (1996). There is more to ethics than principles. The Counseling Psychologist, 24, 92-97.
33.
Kitchener, K. S. (1999). Foundations of ethical practice, research, and teaching in psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34.
Lilienfeld, S. O. (2002). When worlds collide: Social science, politics, and the Rind et al. (1998) child sexual abuse meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 57, 176-188.
35.
Loomer, B. (1976). Two kinds of power. Process Studies, 6(1), 5-32.
36.
MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
37.
MacIntyre, A. (1984). After virtue (2nd ed.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
38.
Maher, B. A. (1978). Stimulus sampling in clinical research: Representative design reviewed. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 643-647.
39.
Markus, H., & Kitayama, S. (1994). A collective fear of the collective: Implications for selves and theories of selves. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 568-579.
40.
Markus, H., & Kitayama, S. (1998). The cultural psychology of personality. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 63-87.
41.
Markus, H., & Kitayama, S. (2001). The cultural construction of self and emotion: Implications for social behavior. In W. Parrott & W. Gerrod (Eds.), Emotions in social psychology: Essential readings (pp. 119-137). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
42.
May, W. F. (1984). The virtues in a professional setting. Soundings, 67, 245-266.
43.
McCormick, R. A. (1989). The critical calling: Reflections on moral dilemmas since Vatican II. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
44.
McKeachie, W. J. (1971). Proceedings of the American Psychological Association, incorporated for the year 1970. American Psychologist, 26, 22-49.
45.
Meara, N. M., & Day, J. D. (2000). Epilogue: Feminist visions and virtues of ethical psychological practice. In M. Brabeck (Ed.), Practicing feminist ethics in psychology (pp. 249-268). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
46.
Meara, N. M., Schmidt, L. D., & Day, J. D. (1996). Principles and virtues: A foundation for ethical decisions, policies, and character. The Counseling Psychologist, 24, 4-77.
47.
Miller, D. J. (1991). The necessity of principles in virtue ethics. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 22, 107.
48.
Miller, G. A. (1969). Psychology as a means of promoting human welfare. American Psychologist, 24, 1063-1075.
49.
Napoli, D. S. (1981). Architects of adjustment. Port Washington, NY: Kennikat.
50.
Nicholson, I. A. M. (1998). Gordon Allport, character, and the “culture of personality,” 1897-1937. History of Psychology, 1, 52-68.
51.
O’Connell, A. N., & Russo, N. F. (1991). Women’s heritage in psychology: Past and present. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 495-504.
52.
Pepinsky, P. N. (1994). Worlds of common sense. Westbury, CT: Greenwood.
53.
Pojman, L. P. (1990). Ethics: Discovering right and wrong. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
54.
Project of the ABIM Foundation, ACP-ASIM Foundation, and European Federation of Internal Medicine. (2002). Perspectives: Medical professionalism in the new millennium. A physician charter. Annals of Internal Medicine, 136, 243-246.
55.
Punzo, V. A., & Meara, N. M. (1993). The virtues of a personal morality. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 13, 25-39.
56.
Rimer, S. (2003, January 27). For a price college offers students privacy. The New York Times, pp. A1, A22.
57.
Rind, B., Tromovitch, P., & Bauserman, R. (1998). A meta-analytic examination of assumed properties of child sexual abuse using college samples. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 22-53.
58.
Scarborough, E., & Furumoto, L. (1987). Untold lives: The first generation of American women psychologists. New York: Columbia University Press.
59.
Simpkins, G., & Raphael, P. (1970). Black students and the challenge of change. American Psychologist, 25, 22-26.
60.
Smith, M. B. (2003). Moral foundations in research with human participants. In A. E. Kazdin (Ed.), Methodological issues and strategies in clinical research (3rd ed., pp. 771-778). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
61.
Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Psychology in search of the human mind (3rd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt College Publishers.
62.
Sternberg, R. J., Forsythe, G. B., Hedlund, J., Horvath, J. A., Wagner, R. K., Williams, W. M., et al. (2000). Practical intelligences in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
63.
Sue, S. (1999). Science, ethnicity, and bias: Where have we gonewrong? American Psychologist, 54, 1070-1077.
64.
Vasquez, M. J. T. (1996). Will virtue ethics improve ethical conduct in multicultural settings and interactions? The Counseling Psychologist, 24, 98-104.
65.
Vasquez, M. J. T., & de las Fuentes, C. (2000). Hate speech or freedom of expression? Balancing autonomy and feminist ethics in a pluralistic society. In M. Brabeck (Ed.), Practicing feminist ethics in psychology (pp. 225-247). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
66.
Williams, R. L. (1970). Report to the APA Council of Representatives. American Psychologist, 25, 27-28.
