Developing good theory about virtues and character requires facing a major obstacle: Many behavioral scientists, including scientific, humanistic, and postmodern, oppose the very idea of virtue. Careful examination of their narratives, ideologies, practices, and communities suggests, however, that each clearly has notions about praiseworthy human characteristics, that is, about virtues. Concepts of virtues and character within a variety of behavioral science approaches are discussed and identified. Virtues are closely related to concepts of goodness and community, with different virtues linked to divergent concepts of the good and competing communities. The problems of implicit conceptions of virtue and the good are discussed. Explicit discussions of virtue, goodness, and multiple communities, it is argued, can help us develop the best possible accounts of character.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, R. M. (1999). Finite and infinite goods: A framework for ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
Allport, G. W. (1921). Personality and character. Psychological Bulletin, 18, 441-455.
3.
Allport, G. W. (1927). Concepts of traits and personality. Psychological Bulletin, 24, 284-293.
4.
Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt.
5.
Allport, G. W., & Vernon, P. E. (1930). The field of personality. Psychological Bulletin, 27, 677-730.
6.
American Psychological Association. (1994). Bylaws of the American Psychological Association. Washington, DC: Author.
7.
American Psychological Society. (1988). Bylaws. Washington, DC: Author.
8.
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1958). Modern moral philosophy. Philosophy, 33, 1-19.
9.
Baumeister, R. F., & Exline, J. J. (1999). Virtue, personality, and social relations: Self-control as the moral muscle. Journal of Personality, 67, 1165-1194.
10.
Baumeister, R. F., & Exline, J. J. (2000). Self-control, morality, and human strength. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 29-42.
11.
Baumrind, D. (1998). Reflections on character and competence. In A. Colby, J. B. James, & D. Hart (Eds.), Competence and character through life (pp. 1-28). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2001). Principles of biomedical ethics (5th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
13.
Blum, L. (1996). Community and virtue. In R. Crisp (Ed.), How should one live? Essays on the virtues (pp. 231-250). Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
14.
Brody, H. (1994). The four principles and narrative ethics. In R. Gillon (Ed.), Principles of health care ethics (pp. 207-215). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
15.
Bunge, M. (1976). Is science value-free and morally neutral? Philosophy and Social Action, 2, 5-18.
16.
Burton, R. V. (1963). Generality of honesty reconsidered. Psychological Review, 70, 481-499.
17.
Campbell, R. L., Christopher, J. C., & Bickhard, M. H. (2002). Self and values: An interactivist foundation for moral development. Theory and Psychology, 12, 795-823.
18.
Cawley, M. J., III, Martin, J. E., & Johnson, J. A. (2000). A virtues approach to personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 997-1013.
19.
Cohen, E., & Cohen, G. S. (1999). The virtuous therapist: Ethical practice of counseling and psychotherapy. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole Wadsworth.
20.
Colby, A., James, J. B., & Hart, D. (Eds.). (1998). Competence and character through life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21.
Davis, K. L. (2001). Naomi M. Meara: Toward the common good. The Counseling Psychologist, 29, 336-357.
22.
Doherty, W. J. (1995). Soul searching: Why psychotherapy must promote moral responsibility. New York: Basic Books/HarperCollins.
23.
Drane, J. F. (1994). Character and the moral life: A virtue approach to biomedical ethics. In E. R. DuBose, R. P. Hamel, & L. J. O’Connell (Eds.), A matter of principles?Ferment in U.S. bioethics (pp. 284-309). Valley Forge, PA: Trinity.
24.
Driver, J. (1996). The virtues and human nature. In R. Crisp (Ed.), How should one live? Essays on the virtues (pp. 111-129). Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
25.
Dueck, A. C. (1995). Between Jerusalem and Athens: Ethical perspectives on culture, religion, and psychotherapy. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker.
26.
Emler, N. (1999). Moral character. In V. J. Derlega & B. A. Winstead (Eds.), Personality: Contemporary theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 376-404). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
27.
Fish, F. C. (Ed.). (1995). Merriam-Webster’s collegiate dictionary (10th ed.). Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.
28.
Flanagan, O., & Rorty, A. O. (1990). Introduction. In O. Flanagan & A. O. Rorty (Eds.), Identity, character, and morality: Essays in moral psychology (pp. 1-15). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29.
Fowers, B. J. (1998). Psychology and the good marriage: Social theory as practice. American Behavioral Scientist, 41, 516-541.
30.
Fowers, B. J. (2000, August). Human agency, character, and the good life. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
31.
Frankena, W. (1963). Ethics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
32.
Gewirth, A. (1978). Reason and morality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33.
Hartshorne, H., & May, M. A. (1928). Studies in the nature of character. Vol. 1: Studies in deceit. New York: Macmillan.
34.
Hartshorne, H., May, M. A., & Maller, J. B. (1929). Studies in the nature of character. Vol. 2: Studies in service and self-control. New York: Macmillan.
35.
Hartshorne, H., May, M. A., & Shuttleworth, F. K. (1930). Studies in the nature of character. Vol. 3: Studies in the organization of character. New York: Macmillan.
36.
Heft, J. L. (1999). A Catholic modernity? Charles Taylor’s Marianist Award Lecture, with responses by William M. She a, Rosemary Luling Haughton, George Marsden, and Jean Bethke Elshtain. New York: Oxford University Press.
37.
Hogan, F. (1973). Moral conduct and moral character: A psychological perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 79, 217-232.
38.
Hursthouse, R. (1999). On virtue ethics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
39.
Ibrahim, F. A. (1996). A multicultural perspective on principle and virtue ethics. The Counseling Psychologist, 24, 78-85.
40.
Kendler, H. H. (1999). The role of value in the world of psychology. American Psychologist, 54, 828-835.
41.
Kendler, H. H. (2000). Amoral thoughts about morality: The intersection of science, psychology, and ethics. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
42.
Keyes, C. L. M., & Haidt, J. (Eds.). (2002). Flourishing: The positive person and the goodlife. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
43.
Kimble, G. A. (1984). Psychology’s two cultures. American Psychologist, 39, 833-839.
44.
Kitchener, K. S. (2000). The foundations of ethical practice in psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
45.
Kohn, A. (1997). How not to teach values: A critical look at character education. Phi Delta Kappan, 78, 428-439.
46.
Kupperman, J. (1991). Character. New York: Oxford University Press.
47.
Lapsley, D. (1996). Moral psychology. Boulder, CO: Westview.
48.
Laudan, L. (1984). Science and values: The aims of science and their role in scientific debate. Berkeley: University of California Press.
49.
Laudan, L. (1987). Progress or rationality? The prospects for normative naturalism. American Philosophical Quarterly, 24, 19-31.
50.
Leming, J. S. (1997). Research and practice in character education: A historical perspective. In A. Molnar (Ed.), The construction of children’s character: 96th year book of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 2 (pp. 31-44). Chicago: The National Society for the Study of Education.
51.
Longino, H. E. (1996). Cognitive and non-cognitive values in science: Rethinking the dichotomy. In L. H. Nelson & J. Nelson (Eds.), Feminism, science, and the philosophy of science (pp. 39-58). Dordrecht, Holland: Kluwer.
52.
MacIntyre, A. (1984). After virtue (Rev. ed.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
53.
MacIntyre, A. (1988). Whose justice? Which rationality? Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
54.
MacIntyre, A. (1990). Three rival versions of moral enquiry: Encyclopedia, genealogy, and tradition. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
55.
Maslow, A. H. (1963). Fusions of facts and values. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 23, 117-131.
56.
McCullough, M. E., & Snyder, C. R. (Eds.). (2000a). Classical sources of humanstrength: A psychological analysis [Special issue]. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19(1).
57.
McCullough, M. E., & Snyder, C. R. (2000b). Classical sources of human strength: Revisiting an old home and building a new one. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 1-10.
58.
Meara, N. M. (2001). Just and virtuous leaders and organizations. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 227-234.
59.
Meara, N. M., Schmidt, L. D., & Day, J. D. (1996). Principles and virtues: A foundation for ethical decisions, policies, and character. The Counseling Psychologist, 24, 4-77.
60.
Meilaender, G. C. (1984). The theory and practice of virtue. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
61.
Morgeson, F. P., Seligman, M. E. P., Sternberg, R. J., Taylor, S. E., & Manning, C. M. (1999). Lessons learned from a life in psychological science: Implications for young scientists. American Psychologist, 54, 106-116.
62.
Naranjo, C. (1970). Present-centeredness: Technique, prescription, and ideal. In J. Fagan & I. L. Shepherd (Eds.), Gestalt therapy now: Theory/techniques/applications (pp. 47-69). New York: Harper.
63.
Nicholson, I. A. M. (1998). Gordon Allport, character, and the “culture of personality,” 1897-1937. History of Psychology, 1, 52-68.
64.
Nicholson, I. A. M. (2003). Inventing personality: Gordon Allport and the science of selfhood. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
65.
Overholser, J. C. (1999). Elements of the Socratic method: VI. Promoting virtue in everyday life. Psychotherapy, 36, 137-145.
66.
Power, F. C. (1997, March). Understanding the character in character education. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago. Retrieved July 14, 2001, from http://tigger.uic.edu/~~lnucci/MoralEd/aotm/article12.html
67.
Power, F. C., Higgins, A., & Kohlberg, L. (1989). The habit of the common life: Building character through democratic community schools. In L. P. Nucci (Ed.), Moral development and character education: A dialogue (pp. 125-143). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
68.
Prilleltensky, I. (1997). Values, assumptions, and practices: Assessing the moral implications of psychological discourse and action. American Psychologist, 52, 517-535.
69.
Punzo, V. A. (1996). After Kohlberg: Virtue ethics and the recovery of the moral self. Philosophical Psychology, 9, 7-23.
70.
Richardson, F. C., Fowers, B. J., & Guignon, C. B. (1999). Re-envisioning psychology: Moral dimensions of theory and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
71.
Roberts, R. C. (1988). Therapies and the grammar of a virtue. In R. H. Bell (Ed.), The grammar of the heart: New essays in moral philosophy and theology (pp. 149-170). San Francisco: Harper & Row.
72.
Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person. Boston: Houghton Mifflin
73.
Rogers, C. R. (1964). Toward a modern approach to values: The valuing process in the mature person. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68, 160-167.
74.
Sabini, J., & Silver, M. (1987). Emotions, responsibility, and character. In F. Schoeman (Ed.), Responsibility, character, and the emotions: New essays in moral psychology (pp. 165-175). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
75.
Sabini, J., & Silver, M. (1998). Emotion, character, and responsibility. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
76.
Sandage, S. J., & Hill, P. C. (2001). The virtues of positive psychology: The rapprochement and challenges of an affirmative postmodern perspective. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 31, 241-260.
77.
Schwartz, B. (2000). Self-determination: The tyranny of freedom. American Psychologist, 55, 79-88.
78.
Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. New York: Free Press.
79.
Seligman, M. E. P., & Czikszentmihalyi, M. (Eds.). (2000). Positive psychology [Special issue]. American Psychologist, 55(1).
80.
Sherman, N. (2000). Wise emotions. In W. S. Brown (Ed.), Understanding wisdom: Sources, science, and society (pp. 319-337). Philadelphia: Templeton Foundation Press.
81.
Slote, M. (2000). Virtue ethics. In H. LaFollette (Ed.), The Blackwell guide to ethical theory (pp. 325-347). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
82.
Slote, M. (2001). Morals from motives. New York: Oxford University Press.
83.
Snyder, C. R., & Lopez, S. (Eds.). (2002). Handbook of positive psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
84.
Stocker, M. (1996). The valuing emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
85.
Taylor, C. (1985). Philosophy and the human sciences: Philosophical papers (Vol. 2). New York: Cambridge University Press.
86.
Taylor, C. (1988). The moral topography of the self. In S. B. Messer, L. A. Sass, & R. Woolfolk (Eds.), Hermeneutics and psychological theory: Interpretive perspectives on personality, psychotherapy, and psychopathology (pp. 299-320). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
87.
Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
88.
Thomas, L. (1996). Virtue ethics and the arc of universality: Reflections on Punzo’s reading of Kantian and virtue ethics. Philosophical Psychology, 9, 25-32.
89.
Tjeltveit, A. C. (1999). Ethics and values in psychotherapy. London: Routledge.
90.
Tjeltveit, A. C. (2000). There’s more to ethics than codes of professional ethics: Social ethics, theoretical ethics, and managed care. The Counseling Psychologist, 28, 242-252.
91.
Veatch, R. M. (1985). Against virtue: A deontological critique of virtue theory in medical ethics. In E. E. Shelp (Ed.), Virtue and medicine: Explorations in the character of medicine (pp. 329-345). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: D. Reidel.
92.
Watson, J. B. (1919). Psychology from the standpoint of a behaviorist. Philadelphia: Lippincott.
93.
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996). Virtues of the mind: An inquiry into the nature of virtue and the ethical foundations of knowledge. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
