Fine, M. (1992). Disruptive voices: The possibilities of feminist research. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
2.
Fine, M. (1994). Working the hyphen: Reinventing self and other in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (pp. 70-82). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
Fine, M. , & Weis, L. (1996). Writing the “wrongs” of fieldwork: Writing dilemmas in urban ethnographies. Qualitative Inquiry, 2, 251-274.
4.
Harding, S. (2001). Comment on Walby's “Against epistemological chasms: The science question in feminism revisited”: Can democratic values and interests ever play a rationally justifiable role in the evaluation of scientific work?Signs, 6, 512-525.
5.
Laws, S. (1990). Issues of blood: The politics of menstruation. New York: Macmillan.
6.
Reason, P. (1994). Three approaches to participative inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (pp. 324-339). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
Smith, D. E. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
