Many perceive the predominantly command-and-control structure of regulatory policy to be overly restrictive and inefficient in achieving America's emerging environmental goals. In response, the U.S. government has introduced several voluntary programs to develop innovative, beyond-compliance environmental management solutions through the collaboration between government agencies and regulated entities. Yet, these programs have not gained widespread acceptance. This article analyzes the cognitive and institutional barriers to that acceptance by looking specifically at two programs—Project XL and Habitat Conservation Plans. These barriers act out of force of habit, creating a resistance to change and a rejection of new forms of regulatory policy. The authors argue that policy change requires a shift in how individuals think and how institutions guide that thinking.
Aldrich, H. E. , & Fiol, C. M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19, 645-670.
3.
Anderson, P. , & Tushman, M. (1990). Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 604-633.
4.
Ayres, I. , & Braithwaite, J. (1992). Responsive regulation: Transcending the deregulation debate. New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
Baden, J. (1995, October 25). The adverse consequences of the ESA. The Seattle Times, p. B5.
6.
Bazerman, M. H. (1983). Negotiator judgment: A critical look at the rationality assumption. American Behavioral Scientist, 27, 618-634.
7.
Bazerman, M. H. (2002). Judgment in managerial decision making (5th ed.). New York: John Wiley.
8.
Bazerman, M. , & Hoffman, A. (in press). Applying the insights of Walton and McKersie to the environmental context. In T. Kochan & D. Lipsky (Eds.), Negotiations and change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
9.
Bazerman, M. H. , Moore, M. A., & Gillespie, J. J. (1999). The human mind as a barrier to wiser environmental agreements. American Behavioral Scientist, 42(8), 1254-1276.
10.
Blackman, A. , & Mazurek, J. (1999). The cost of developing site-specific environmental regulations: Evidence from EPA's Project XL. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
11.
Breckenridge, L. (1999). Symposium: The role of the non-profits, watershed organizations, and the unorganized public in environmental decision-making. Ecology Law Quarterly, 25, 692.
12.
Cohn, J. P. (1998). Negotiating nature. Government Executive, 30(2), 50-53.
13.
Council of Economic Advisors . (1996). Economic report of the president. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
14.
Crismon, S. (1998). Pender County, North Carolina red-cockaded woodpecker habitat conservation plan and safe harbor. In Improving integrated natural resource planning: Habitat conservation plans. Knoxville, TN: National Center for Environmental Decision-Making Research.
15.
Davies, C. , & Mazurek, J. (1997). Regulating pollution: Does the U.S. system work?Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
16.
Easterbrook, G. (1995). A moment on the earth. New York: Viking.
17.
EPA offers innovative firms the chance to excel . (1995). Environment Today, 6, 1.
18.
Fiorino, D. (1999). Rethinking environmental regulation: Perspectives on law and governance. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 23(2), 441-469.
19.
Fraser, H. , & Belew, E. (1996, March 15). Looking past the concept of Plum Creek's Project. The Seattle Times, p. B5.
20.
Geltman, E. G. , & Skroback, A. E. (1998). Reinventing the EPA to conform with the new American environmentality. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 23, 1-56.
21.
Greenwood, R. , & Hinings, C. (1996). Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1022-1054.
22.
Harris, P. (1996a). They just don't get it. Environmental Management Today, 7, 4.
23.
Harris, P. (1996b). Project XL begins to crumble as some firms say, “no thanks.”Environmental Management Today, 7, 1.
24.
Hirsch, P. (1997). Sociology without social structure: Neo-institutional theory meets brave new world. American Journal of Sociology, 102(6), 1702-1723.
25.
Hoffman, A. J. (1997). From heresy to dogma: An institutional history of corporate environmentalism. San Francisco: New Lexington Press.
26.
Hoffman, A. J. , Gillespie, J. J., Moore, D., Wade-Benzoni, K., Thompson, L., & Bazerman, M. H. (1999). A mixed-motive perspective on the economics versus environment debate. American Behavioral Scientist, 42(8), 1254-1276.
27.
Hoffman, A. J. , & Ventresca, M. (1999). The institutional framing of policy debates: Economics versus the environment. American Behavioral Scientist, 42(8), 1368-1392.
28.
Jasanoff, S. (1990). The fifth branch. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
Jones, D. R. (1996). Project XL okays its pilot partners. Environmental Management Today, 7, 1.
30.
Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives and public policies. New York: HarperCollins.
31.
Lindbolm, C. (1959). The science of “muddling through.”Public Administration Review, 19, 79-88.
32.
Lowry, W. R. (2000). Natural resource policies in the twenty-first century. In N. Vig & M. E. Kraft (Eds.), Environmental policy: New directions for the twenty-first century (pp. 303-325). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
33.
Marcus, A. , Geffen, D., & Sexton, K. (in press). The search for common ground: Overcoming barriers to cooperative environmental solutions. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future Press.
34.
Messick, D. M. , & Sentis, K. P. (1985). Estimating social and nonsocial utility functions from ordinal data. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 389-399.
35.
Morone, J. (1993). Winning in high tech markets. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
National Performance Review. (2000). Reinventing regulation pays off big [Online]. Available: www.npr.gov/initiati/common/reinvreg.html
39.
Noss, R. F. , O'Connell, M. A., & Murphy, D. D. (1997). The science of conservation planning: Habitat conservation under the Endangered Species Act. Washington, DC: Island Press.
40.
Palmer, K. , Oates, W., & Portney, P. (1995). Tightening environmental standards: The benefit-cost or the no-cost paradigm?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 119-132.
41.
Pandya, A. , Rosenfeld, F., & Caffee, V. (1998, March 11). A strong Superfund law is crucial to make polluters clean up sites. Asbury Park Press, p. A13.
42.
Porter, M. E. , & van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new competition of the environment—Competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 9-118.
43.
Portney, P. (1998). Counting the cost. Environment, 40(2), 14-18.
44.
Powell, W. , & DiMaggio, P. (Eds.). (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ring, P. S. , & Van de Ven, A. H. (1994). Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 19(1), 90-118.
47.
Robertson, C. J. , & Jett, T. H. (1999). Pro-environmental support: The environmental and industrial benefits of project XL. Organizational Dynamics, 28(2), 81-88.
48.
Ruckelshaus, W. (1996, November 15). Trust in government: A prescription for restoration. Paper presented as part of the Webb Lecture series at the meeting of the National Academy of Public Administration, Washington, DC.
49.
Sabel, C. , Fung, A., & Karkkainen, B. (1999). Beyond backyard environmentalism: How communities are quietly refashioning environmental regulation. Boston Review, 24(5), 4-11.
50.
Schmitt, R. (1994, Summer). The AMOCO/EPA Yorktown experience and regulating the right thing. Natural Resources and the Environment, 51, 11-13.
51.
Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. London: Sage.
52.
Scott, W. , & Backman, E. (1990). Institutional theory and the medical care sector. In S. Mick (Ed.), Innovations in health care delivery: Insights for organizational theory (pp. 20-52). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
53.
Skocpol, T. (1985). Bringing the state back in: Strategies of analysis in current research. In P. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer, & T. Skocpol (Eds.), Bringing the state back in (pp. 3-43). New York: Cambridge University Press.
54.
Skrzycki, C. (1997, January 24). Critics see a playground for polluters in EPA's XL plan. The Washington Post, p. D01.
55.
Spyke, N. P. (1999). Public participation in environmental decision making at the new millennium: Structuring new spheres of public influence. Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review, 26(2), 263-313.
56.
Steinzor, R. I. (1998). Reinventing environmental regulation: The dangerous journey from command to self-control. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 22(1), 103-202.
57.
Tenbrunsel, A. , Wade-Benzoni, K., Messick, D., & Bazerman, M. H. (1997). The dysfunctional effects of standards on environmental attitudes and choices. In M. H. Bazerman, D. M. Messick, A. E. Tenbrunsel, & K. Wade-Benzoni (Eds.), Environment, ethics, and behavior: The psychology of environmental valuation and degradation (pp. 105-121). San Francisco: New Lexington Press.
58.
Teubner, G. (1983). Substantive and reflexive elements in modern law. Law and Society Review, 17, 239-252.
59.
Thompson, L. (2001). The mind and heart of the negotiator (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
60.
Thompson, L. , & Gonzalez, R. (1997). Environmental disputes: Competition for scarce resources and clashing of values. In M. H. Bazerman, D. M. Messick, A. E. Tenbrunsel, & K. Wade-Benzoni (Eds.), Environment, ethics, and behavior: The psychology of environmental valuation and degradation (pp. 75-104). San Francisco: New Lexington Press.
61.
Thompson, L. , & Hastie, R. (1990). Social perception in negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47, 98-123.
62.
Thompson, L. , & Hrebec, D. (1996). Lose-lose agreements in interdependent decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 120(3), 396-409.
63.
Troast, J. , Hoffman, A., Riley, H., & Bazerman, M. (in press). Institutions as barriers and enablers to negotiated agreements: Institutional entrepreneurship and the Plum Creek habitat conservation plan. In A. Hoffman & M. Ventresca (Eds.), Organizations, policy and the natural environment: Institutional and strategic perspectives. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
64.
Tushman, M. L. , Anderson, P. C., & O'Reilly, C. (1997). Technology cycles, innovation streams, and ambidextrous organizations: Organizational renewal through innovation streams and strategic change. In M. L. Tushman & P. C. Anderson (Eds.), Managing strategic innovation streams (pp. 3-23). New York: Oxford University Press.
65.
U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the National Marine Fisheries Service. (1996). Habitat conservation planning and incidental take permit processing handbook. Washington DC: U.S. Department of the Interior.
66.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency . (1998a). Evaluation of Project XL stakeholder processes. Washington, DC: Author.
67.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency . (1998b). Project XL preliminary status report. Washington, DC: Author.
68.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1999). Project XL [Online]. Available: www.epa.gov/projectxl
69.
U.S. General Accounting Office . (1997). Environmental protection: Challenges facing EPA's efforts to reinvent environmental regulation (GAO/RCED-97-155). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
70.
U.S. General Accounting Office . (1999). Major management challenges and program risks: Environmental Protection Agency (GAO/OCG-99-17). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
71.
Ventresca, M. , & Washington, M. (1998). Organizational fields: Bringing conflict back in (DRRC Working Paper). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.
72.
Wade-Benzoni, K. , Tenbrunsel, A., & Bazerman, M. H. (1996). Egocentric interpretations of fairness of asymmetric, environmental social dilemmas: Explaining harvesting behavior and the role of communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(2), 111-126.
73.
Walley, N. , & Whitehead, B. (1994, May-June). It's not easy being green. Harvard Business Review, 46-51.
74.
Wasserman, S. , & Galaskiewicz, J. (1994). Advances in social network analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
75.
Weidenbaum, M. (1997, winter). Regulatory process reform: From Ford to Clinton. Regulation, 1-7.
76.
Weingart, L. , Thompson, L., Bazerman, M. H., & Carroll, J. S. (1990). Tactical behavior and negotiation outcomes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 1, 7-31.
77.
Westneat, D. (1996). Logging that will protect wildlife?The Seattle Times, p. B1.
78.
Zucker, L. (1983). Organizations as institutions. In S. Bacharach (Ed.), Research in the sociology of organization (pp. 1-47). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
79.
Zucker, L. (1986). Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840-1920. In Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 8, pp. 53-111). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
