In this article, natural resource management is conceptualized as a social dilemma, a conflict between the short-term self-interest of users and the long-term collective interest of the user community. A self-interest versus community perspective is offered to explain individuals' decision making in resource dilemmas. The self-interest model assumes that users seek to maximize their personal benefits regardless of the collective implications. To foster sustainable use, it is necessary to restrict people's access to the resource either through controlling the resource centrally (centralization) or by creating a system of individual access (individualization). The alternative community model suggests that communities can foster self-restraint among users provided that they feel attached to their community. These two perspectives and their implications for natural resource management are systematically compared using findings from research on water conservation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aiken, L. S. , & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
Baumeister, R. , & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.
3.
Bell, P. A. , Petersen, T. R., & Hautaluoma, J. E. (1989). The effect of punishment probability on overconsumption and stealing in a simulated commons. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 1483-1495.
4.
Brewer, M. B. , & Kramer, R. M. (1986). Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size and decision framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 543-549.
5.
Caporeal, L. P. , Dawes, R. M., Orbell, J. M., & van de Kragt, A.J.C. (1989). Selfishness examined: Cooperation in the absence of egoistic incentives. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 683-699.
6.
Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169-193.
7.
Dawes, R. M. , McTavish, J., & Shaklee, H. (1977). Behavior, communication, and assumptions about other people's behavior in a commons dilemma situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 1-11.
8.
Deci, E. L. , & Ryan, R. M. (1975). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
9.
De Cremer, D. , & Van Vugt, M. (1999). Social identification effects in social dilemmas: A transformation of motives. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 871-893.
10.
Eisenberger, R. (1992). Learned industriousness. Psychological Review, 99, 248-267.
11.
Ellemers, N. , Wilke, H., & Van Knippenberg, A. (1993). Effects of legitimacy of low group or individual status on individual and collective status-enhancement strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 776-778.
12.
Foddy, M. , Smithson, M., Schneider, S., & Hogg, M. (1999). Resolving social dilemmas. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
13.
Gardner, G. T. , & Stern, P. C. (1996). Environmental problems and human behavior. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
14.
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243-1248.
15.
Hogg, M. A. , & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications. London: Routledge.
16.
Jerdee, T. H. , & Rosen, B. (1974). Effects of opportunity to communicate and visibility of individual decisions on behavior in the common interest. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 712-716.
17.
Kerr, N. L. (1999). Anonymity and social control in social dilemmas. In M. Foddy, M. Smithson, S. Schneider, & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Resolving social dilemmas: Dynamic, structural, and intergroup aspects (pp. 103-120). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
18.
Komorita, S. S. , & Parks, C. D. (1994). Social dilemmas. Dubuque, IA: Brown & Benchmark.
19.
Kramer, R. M. , & Brewer, M. B. (1984). Effects of group identity on resource use in a simulated commons dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1044-1057.
20.
Kramer, R. , McClintock, C. G., & Messick, D. M. (1986). Social values and cooperative response to a simulated resource conservation crisis. Journal of Personality, 54, 101-117.
21.
Liebrand, W. , Messick, D., & Wilke, H. (1992). Social dilemmas: Theoretical issues and research findings. Oxford, U.K.: Pergamon Press.
22.
Luce, R. D. , & Raiffa, H. (1957). Games and decisions: Introduction and critical survey. London: John Wiley.
23.
Messick, D. M. , Wilke, H.A.M., Brewer, M. B., Kramer, R. M., Zemke, P. E., & Lui, L. (1983). Individual adaptations and structural change as solutions to social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 294-309.
24.
Office of Water Services . (1996). Annual report, 1995. London: HMSO.
25.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development . (1998). Water consumption and sustainable water resources management [Conference proceedings]. Paris: Author.
26.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Rutte, C. G. , & Wilke, H.A.M. (1985). Preference for decision structures in a social dilemma situation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 367-370.
28.
Samuelson, C. D. (1991). Perceived task difficulty, causal attributions, and preferences for structural change in resource dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 181-187.
29.
Samuelson, C. D. (1993). A multi-attribute approach to structural change in resource dilemmas. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 298-324.
30.
Samuelson, C. D. , Messick, D. M., Rutte, C. G., & Wilke, H.A.M. (1984). Individual and structural solutions to resource dilemmas in two cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 94-104.
31.
Schlager, E. (2002). Rationality, cooperation, and common pool resources. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(5), 801-819.
32.
Schroeder, D. A. (1995). Social dilemmas. Westport, CT: Praeger.
33.
Sullivan, J. L. , Borgida, E., Jackson, M. S., Riedel, E., Oxendine, A., & Gangl, A. (2002). Social capital and community electronic networks: For-profit versus for-community approaches. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(5), 868-886.
34.
Tajfel, H. , & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
35.
Tenbrunsel, A. E. , & Messick, D. M. (1999). Sanctioning systems, decision frames, and cooperation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 684-707.
36.
Thibaut, J. W. , & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: John Wiley.
37.
Tyler, T. (2000). Why do people cooperate with groups? Support for structural solutions to social dilemma problems. In M. Van Vugt, M. Snyder, T. R. Tyler, & A. Biel (Eds.), Cooperation in modern society: Promoting the welfare of communities, states, and organizations (pp. 64-82). London: Routledge.
38.
Tyler, T. R. (2002). Leadership and cooperation in groups. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(5), 769-782.
39.
Tyler, T. R. , & Dawes, R. M. (1993). Fairness in groups: Comparing the self-interest and social identity perspectives. In B. A. Melkers & J. Baron (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on justice: Theory and applications (pp. 87-108). New York: Cambridge University Press.
40.
Tyler, T. R. , & Degoey, P. (1995). Collective restraint in social dilemmas: Procedural justice and social identification effects on support for authorities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 482-497.
41.
Tyler, T. , & Smith, H. J. (1998). Social justice and social movements. In D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 595-632). New York: McGraw Hill.
42.
Van Vugt, M. (2001). Community identification moderating the impact of financial incentives in a natural social dilemma: Water conservation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 1440-1449.
43.
Van Vugt, M. , & De Cremer, D. (1999). Leadership in social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 587-599.
44.
Van Vugt, M. , & Samuelson, C. D. (1999). The impact of personal metering in the management of a natural resource crisis: A social dilemma analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 731-745.
45.
Van Vugt, M. , Snyder, M., Tyler, T., & Biel, A. (2000). Cooperation in modern society: Promoting the welfare of communities, states, and organizations. London: Routledge.
46.
Wilke, H.A.M. (1991). Greed, efficiency and fairness in resource management situations. European Review of Social Psychology, 2, 165-187.
47.
World Resources Institute. (2000). World Resources 2000-2001-People and ecosystems: The fraying web of life [Online]. Available: www.wri.org/wr2000/
48.
Yamagishi, T. (1986). The structural goal/expectation theory of cooperation in social dilemmas. In E. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 3, pp. 51-87). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
49.
Yamagishi, T. (1988). Seriousness of social dilemmas and the provision of a sanctioning system. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 32-42.
