The current structure of the international telecommunications network and how it has changed since the late 1970s are examined. Consistent with world-systems theory, the net-work may be described as one large interconnected group of nations arrayed along a center-to-periphery dimension. At the core are the United States, Canada, and Western Europe. At the periphery are the poorer nations and the former Soviet republics. The network may be subdivided into eight regional blocks, what Huntington labels civilizations. Over time, the network has become denser and more highly integrated and centralized. Recently, however, there has been a significant reversal in centralization. Furthermore, the rate of change among 39 wealthier nations appears to be accelerating.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ahn, M. , & Barnett, G. A. (1995, May). The discontinuance of telex: A study of the international telex network. Paper presented to the International Communication Association, Albuquerque, NM.
2.
AT&T. (1990). The world's telephones: A statistical compilation as of January 1, 1989. Morristown, NJ: Author.
3.
Barnett, G. A. , & Choi, Y. (1995). Physical distance and language as determinants of the international telecommunications network. International Political Science Review, 16, 249-265.
4.
Barnett, G. A. , & Danowski, J. A. (1992). The structure of communication: A network analysis of the International Communication Association. Human Communication Research, 19(2), 264-285.
5.
Barnett, G. A. , Jacobson, T., Choi Y., & Sun-Miller, S. (1996). An examination of the international telecommunication network. The Journal of International Communication, 3, 19-43.
6.
Barnett, G. A. , & Kincaid, D. L. (1983). Cultural convergence: A mathematical theory. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Intercultural communication theory: Current perspectives (pp. 171-194). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
7.
Barnett, G. A. , & Rice, R. E. (1985). Network analysis in Riemann space: Applications of the Galileo System to social networks. Social Networks, 7, 287-322.
8.
Barnett, G. A. , & Salisbury, J.G.T. (1996). Communication and globalization: A longitudinal analysis of the international telecommunication network. Journal of World System Research, 2(16), 1-17.
9.
Barnett, G. A. , Salisbury, J.G.T., Kim, C., & Langhorne, A. (1999). Globalization and international communication: An examination of monetary, telecommunications, and trade networks. Journal of International Communication, 6(2), 7-49.
10.
Barnett, G. A. , & Woelfel, J. (Eds.). (1988). Readings in the Galileo System: Theory, methods, and applications. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
11.
Bergesen, A. (1992). Communism's collapse: A world-system explanation. Journal of Political and Military Sociology, 20, 133-151.
12.
Beyer, P. (1994). Religion and globalization. London: Sage.
13.
Bollen, K. A. (1983). World system position, dependency, and democracy. American Sociological Review, 48, 468-497.
14.
Bonacich, P. (1987). Power and centrality: A family of measures. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 1170-1182.
15.
Borgatti, S. , Everett, M., & Freeman, L. (1992). UCINET-X: Network analysis software. Columbia, SC: Analytic Technologies.
16.
Chase-Dunn, C. (1989). Global formation: Structures of the world economy. London: Basil Blackwell.
17.
Chase-Dunn, C. , & Grimes, P. (1995). World systems analysis. Annual Review of Sociology, 21, 387-417.
18.
Chirot, D. , & Hall, T. (1982). World-system theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 8, 81-106.
19.
Contractor, N. S. , & Whitbred, R. C. (1997). Decision development in work groups: A comparison of contingency and self-organizing systems perspectives. In G. A. Barnett & L. Thayer (Eds.), Organization communication: Emerging perspectives V—The renaissance in systems thinking (pp. 83-104). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
20.
Danowski, J. A. , & Edison-Swift, P. (1985). Crisis effects on intraorganizational computer-based communication. Communication Research, 12, 251-270.
21.
Doerfel, M. L. , & Barnett, G. A. (1999). A semantic network analysis of the International Communication Association. Human Communication Research, 25, 589-603.
22.
Frederick, H. (1993). Global communication and international relations. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
23.
Galtung, J. (1971). A structural theory of imperialism. Journal of Peace Research, 8, 81-118.
24.
Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
25.
Huntington, S. P. (1988). The U.S.—Decline or renewal?Foreign Affairs, 67, 76-96.
26.
Huntington, S. P. (1996). The clash of civilizations: Remaking of the world order. New York: Touchstone.
27.
Kincaid, D. L. , Yum, J. O., Woelfel, J., & Barnett, G. A. (1983). The cultural convergence of Korean immigrants in Hawaii: An empirical test of a mathematical theory. Quality and Quantity, 18, 59-98.
28.
Luhmann, N. (1990). Essays on self-reference. New York: Columbia University Press.
29.
McLuhan, H. M. (1966). Understanding media: The extensions of man. New York: Beacon.
30.
Nye, J. S. , & Owens, W. A. (1996, March/April). America's information edge. Foreign Affairs, 75, 20-36.
31.
O'Brien, R. (1992). Global financial integration: The end of geography. London: Pinter.
32.
Pool, I.D.S. (1990). Technologies without boundaries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33.
Richards, W. D. (1993). Communication/information networks, strange complexity, and parallel topological dynamics. In W. D. Richards & G. A. Barnett (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences (Vol. 12, pp. 165-196). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
34.
Richards, W. D. Jr. (1995). The NEGOPY Network Analysis Program. Burnaby, BC: Simon Fraser University, Department of Communication.
35.
Richards, W. D. Jr. , & Barnett, G. A. (Eds.). (1993). Progress in communication science (Vol. 12). Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1993.
36.
Rogers, E. M. , & Kincaid, D. L. (1981). Communication networks: Toward a new paradigm for research. New York: Free Press.
37.
Salisbury, J.G.T. , & Barnett, G. A. (1999). A network analysis of international monetary flows. Information Society, 15, 1-19.
38.
Shannon, T. R. (1989). World system perspective. San Francisco: Westview.
39.
Smith, D. A. , & White, D. R. (1992). Structure and dynamics of the global economy: Network analysis of international trade 1965-1980. Social Forces, 70, 857-893.
40.
Snyder, D. , & Kick, E. (1979). Structural position in the world system and economic growth, 1955-1970: A multiple-network analysis of transnational interactions. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 1096-1126.
41.
Staple, G. C. (1996). TeleGeography 1996-97: Global telecommunications traffic statistics and commentary. London: International Institute of Communications.
42.
Sun, S. , & Barnett, G. A. (1994). An analysis of the international telephone network and democratization. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45, 411-421.
43.
Tutzauer, F. (1997). Chaos and organization. In G. A. Barnett & L. Thayer (Eds.), Organization-communication: Emerging perspectives V—The renaissance in systems thinking (pp. 213-228). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
44.
U.S. Bureau of the Census . (1996). Population projections of the United States by age, sex, race, and Hispanic origin: 1995 to 2050. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
45.
Wallerstein, I. (1976). The modern world system. New York: Academic.
46.
Wallerstein, I. (1993). The world-systems after the cold war. Journal of Peace Research, 30, 1-6.
47.
Woelfel, J. , & Fink, E. L. (1980). The measurement of communication processes: Galileo theory and methods. New York: Academic.
48.
Woelfel, J. , Holmes, R. A., & Kincaid, D. L. (1988). Rotation to congruence under theoretical constraints. In G. A. Barnett & J. Woelfel (Eds.), Readings in the Galileo System: Theory, methods, and applications (pp. 219-234). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
