This article builds on the previous research that focused more specifically on the candidate-media dynamic within the agenda-setting process and extends the research in the direction of strategy framing. Using VBPro, a computer program for content analysis, 1,479 candidate press releases and 756 network news stories were content-analyzed using key words in context frames. Results show significant positive correlation between candidate and media issue agendas, which were particularly strong for the Republican candidates. Appeals to audience frames were highly correlated between Republican candidates and the media. Autocorrelations used to measure the direction of influence suggest that the relationship between candidates and media is reciprocal. However, the process frames were significantly correlated only for McCain and the networks, which may offer support for the appearance that McCain and the media had a “love-affair” during the 2000 presidential primary.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Brady, H. E. , & Johnston, R. (1987). What's the primary message: Horse race or issue journalism? In G. Orren & N. Polsby (Eds.), Media and momentum: The New Hampshire primary and nomination politics (pp. 127-186). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
2.
Cohen, B. (1963). The press and foreign policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
Cronin, T. E. , & Loevy, R. D. (1994). Yes, it is time for a new nominating process. In G. L. Rose (Ed.), Controversial issues in presidential selection (pp. 28-36). Albany: State University of New York Press.
4.
Dalton, R. J. , Beck, P. A., Huckfeldt, R., & Koetzle, W. (1998). A test of media-centered agenda setting: Newspaper content and public interests in a presidential election. Political Communication, 15, 463-481.
5.
Entman, R. M. (1989). Democracy without citizens: Media and the decay of American politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
Entman, R. M (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.
7.
Evatt, D. S. , & Bell, T. (1995, August). The political dance: A test of agenda-setting effects in the 1994 Texas gubernatorial election. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Washington, DC.
8.
Gandy, O. (1982). Beyond agenda-setting. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
9.
Geer, J. G. (1989). Nominating presidents: An evaluation of voters and primaries. New York: Greenwood.
10.
Guilford, J. P. (1956). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
11.
Iyengar, S. , & Kinder, D. (1987). News that matters: Television and American opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
Just, M. R. , Crigler, A. N., Alger, D. E., Cook, T. E., Kern, M., & West, D. M. (1996). Crosstalk: Citizens, candidates and the media in a presidential campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
Kaid, L. L. (1976). Newspaper treatment of a candidate's news releases. Journalism Quarterly, 53(1), 135-157.
14.
Kaid, L. L. , McKinney, M., & Tedesco, J. C. (2000). Civic dialogue in the 1996 presidential campaign. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
15.
Kendall, K. (1998). Communication patterns in presidential primaries, 1912-2000: Knowing the rules of the game (Research paper). Cambridge, MA: The Joan Shorenstein Center at Harvard University.
16.
Kendall, K. (2000). Communication in the presidential primaries: Candidates and the media, 1912-2000. New York: Greenwood.
17.
Lopez-Escobar, E. , Llamas, J. P., McCombs, M., & Lennon, F. R. (1998). Two levels of agenda setting among advertising and news in the 1995 Spanish elections. Political Communication, 15, 225-238.
18.
Matthews, D. (1978). “Winnowing:” The news media and the 1976 presidential nomination. In J. D. Barber (Ed.), Race for the presidency: The media and the nominating process (pp. 55-78). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
19.
McCombs, M. (1992). Explorers and surveyors: Expanding strategies for agenda-setting research. Journalism Quarterly, 69, 813-824.
20.
McCombs, M. (1994). News influence on our pictures of the world. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
McCombs, M. , Lopez-Escobar, E., & Llamas, J. P. (2000). Setting the agenda of attributes in the 1996 Spanish general election. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 77-92.
22.
McKinnon, L. M. , & Tedesco, J. C. (1998, November). Agenda-setting comparisons of mainstream and on-line publications: The case of presidential press releases. Paper presented at the National Communication Association Convention, New York.
23.
Meyrowitz, J. (1995). The problem of getting on the media agenda: A case study in competing logics of campaign coverage. In K. E. Kendall (Ed.), Presidential campaign discourse (pp. 35-67). Albany: State University of New York Press.
24.
Miller, M. M. , Andsager, J. L., & Reichert, B. P. (1998). Framing the candidates in presidential primaries: Issues and images in press releases and news coverage. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 75(2), 312-324.
25.
Patterson, T. (1993). Out of order. New York: Knopf.
26.
Polsby, N. , & Wildavsky, A. (1988). Presidential elections: Contemporary strategies of American electoral politics (7th ed.). New York: Free Press.
27.
Ponnuru, R. (2000). McCainiacs—John + the media = love. National Review, 20, 17.
28.
Roberts, M. , & McCombs, M. (1994). Agenda-setting and political advertising: Origins of the news agenda. Political Communication, 11, 249-262.
29.
Smith, C. A. (1995). The struggle for interpretive dominance. In K. E. Kendall (Ed.), Presidential campaign discourse (pp. 293-303). Albany: State University of New York Press.
30.
Stuckey, M. E. , & Antczak, F. J. (1995). The battle of issues and images: Establishing interpretive dominance. In K. E. Kendall (Ed.), Presidential campaign discourse (pp. 117-134). Albany: State University of New York Press.
31.
Trent, J. S. , & Friedenberg, R. V. (1995). Political campaign communication: Principles and practices (3rd ed.). Westport, CT: Praeger.
32.
West, D. (1993). Air wars: Television advertising in election campaigns, 1952-1992. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
33.
Williams, F. (1986). Reasoning with statistics (3rd ed.). Orlando, FL: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
34.
Winter, J. , & Eyal, C. (1981). Agenda-setting for the civil rights issue. Public Opinion Quarterly, 45, 376-383.
