This study assesses the effects of the 2000 presidential spots of Gore and Bush. Findings from a national experimental study suggest that Bush benefited more from the ads, even among female voters who have traditionally favored Democrats. The study also examined the effects of technological distortions by testing the famous Bush “RATS” ad. However, the presence of the so-called subliminal technique used by the Bush campaign did not affect voter response to the ad.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ansolabehere, S. , & Iyengar, S. (1995). Going negative. New York: Free Press.
2.
Berke, R. (2000, September 12). The 2000 campaign: The ad campaign; Democrats see, and smell, Rats in G.O.P. Ad. The New York Times, p. A1.
3.
Devlin, L. P. (2001). Contrasts in presidential campaign commercials of 2000. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 2331-2362.
4.
Geiger, S. F. , & Reeves, B. (1991) The effects of visual structure and content emphasis on the evaluation and memory for political candidates. In F. Biocca (Ed.), Television and political advertising (Vol. 1, pp. 125-144). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
Kaid, L. L. (1991). Ethical dimensions of political advertising. In R. Denton (Ed.), Ethical dimensions of political communication (pp. 145-169). New York: Praeger.
6.
Kaid, L. L. (1995). Measuring candidate image with semantic differentials. In K. Hacker (Ed.), Candidate images in presidential election campaigns (pp. 131-134). Westport, CT: Praeger.
7.
Kaid, L. L. (1996). Technology and political advertising: The application of ethical standards to the 1992 spots. Communication Research Reports, 13, 129-137.
8.
Kaid, L. L. (1997). Effects of the television spots on images of Dole and Clinton. American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 1085-1094.
9.
Kaid, L. L. (1998). Videostyle and the effects of the 1996 presidential campaign advertising. In R. E. Denton (Ed.), The 1996 presidential campaign: A communication perspective (pp. 143-159). Westport, CT: Praeger.
10.
Kaid, L. L. (1999). Political advertising: A summary of research findings. In B. Newman (Ed.), The handbook of political marketing (pp. 423-438). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
Kaid, L. (2000). Ethics and political advertising. In R. Denton (Ed.), Political communication ethics: An oxymoron? (pp. 148-177). Westport, CT: Praeger.
12.
Kaid, L. L. , & Chanslor, M. (1995). Changing candidate images: The effects of television advertising. In K. Hacker (Ed.), Candidate images in presidential election campaigns (pp. 83-97). Westport, CT: Praeger.
13.
Kaid, L. L. , Leland, C., & Whitney, S. (1993). The impact of televised political ads: Evoking viewer responses in the 1988 presidential campaign. Southern Communication Journal, 57, 285-295.
14.
Kaid, L. L. , Lin, Y., & Noggle, G. (1999). The effects of technological distortions on voter reactions to the televised political advertising. In L. L. Kaid & D. G. Bystrom (Eds.), The electronic election: Perspectives on the 1996 campaign communication (pp. 247-256). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
Kaid, L. L. , & Noggle, G. (1998). Televised political advertising in the 1992 and 1996 elections: Using technology to manipulate voters. Southeastern Political Review, 26, 889-906.
16.
Kaid, L. L. , & Tedesco, J. C. (1999). Tracking voter reactions to the television advertising. In L. L. Kaid & D. G. Bystrom (Eds.), The electronic election: Perspectives on the 1996 campaign communication (pp. 233-245). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
Kern, M. (1989). 30-second politics: Political advertising in the eighties. New York: Praeger.
18.
Lang, A. (1991). Emotion, formal features, and memory for televised political advertisements. In F. Biocca (Ed.), Television and political advertising (Vol. 1, pp. 221-244). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
Newhagen, J. E. , & Reeves, B. (1991). Emotion and memory responses for negative political advertising: A study of television commercials used in the 1988 presidential election. In F. Biocca (Ed.), Television and political advertising (Vol. 1, pp. 197-220). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
Noggle, G. , & Kaid, L. L. (2000). The effects of visual images in political ads: Experimental testing of distortions and visual literacy. Social Science Quarterly, 81, 913-927.
21.
Thorson, E. , Christ, W. G., & Caywood, C. (1991). Effects of issue-image strategies, attack and support appeals, music, and visual content in political commercials. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 35, 465-486.
