Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

If campaigns are times for political representatives to consult or negotiate with a citizenry, then the ways that a public conversation is conducted matters. In this study, all campaign stories in two national newspapers over the last 2 weeks of Campaign 2000 were sorted by dominant issues and examined for public commentary on those issues. About 60% of the stories featured discussion of candidate images (within narratives of campaigning depicted as races, military campaigns, or dramatic performances), with the remaining stories featuring 1 of 18 other issues. Issues as such all but disappeared. The candidate image stories were dominated by statistical representations of binary—yes-no, good-bad—opinions. The study concludes that the public had no real voice in the electoral conversation at the end of Campaign 2000, only serving to indicate who was ahead or behind. A citizenry can have little effect on political agenda if depicted only as a numerical mass.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Åsard, E. , & Bennett, W. L. (1997). Democracy and the marketplace of ideas: Communication and government in Sweden and the United States. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Benhabib, S. (1996). The reluctant modernism of Hannah Arendt. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Bennett, W. L. (1988). News: The politics of illusion. New York: Longman.

Bennett, W. L. (2001). News: The politics of illusion (4th ed.). New York: Addison Wesley Longman.

Davies, P. J. (1999). U.S. elections today. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.

Edelman, M. (1964). The symbolic uses of politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

Edelman, M. (1988). Constructing the political spectacle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sherman, Trans.). New York: Vintage.

Gronbeck, B. E. (1997). Character, celebrity, and sexual innuendo in the mass-mediated presidency. In J. Lull & S. Hinerman (Eds.), Media scandals: Morality and desire in the popular cultural marketplace (pp. 122-142). Cambridge, UK: Polity.

10.

Hardt, H. , & Splichal, S. (Eds.). (2000). Ferdinand Tönnies on public opinion (H. Hardt & S. Splichal, Trans.). New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

11.

Herbst, S. (1993). Numbered voices: How opinion polling has shaped American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

12.

Herbst, S. (1998). Reading public opinion: How political actors view the democratic process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

13.

Holloway, H. , & George, J. (1979). Public opinion: Coalitions, elites, and masses. New York: St. Martin's.

14.

Jeffords, S. (1989). The remasculinization of America: Gender and the Vietnam war. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

15.

Miller, A. H. , & Gronbeck, B. E. (Eds.). (1994). Presidential campaigns and American self images. Boulder, CO: Westview.

16.

Mumby, D. K. , & Spitzack, C. (1983). Ideology and television news: A metaphoric analysis of political stories. Communication Studies, 34, 162-171.

17.

Paleologos, D. A. (1997). A pollster on polling. American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 1183-1189.

18.

Parenti, M. (1994). Land of idols: Political mythology in America. New York: St. Martin's.

19.

Postman, N. (1985). Amusing ourselves to death: Public discourse in the age of show business. New York: Penguin.

20.

Ratzan, S. (1989). The real agenda setters. American Behavioral Scientist, 32, 451-463.

21.

Ratzan, S. C. (1993). Political communication as negotiation: Breathing life into government. American Behavioral Scientist, 37, 200-210.

22.

Sassi, S. (1996). The network and the fragmentation of the public sphere. Javnost—The Public, 3, 25-42.

23.

Williams, C. B. (1996). The media and the message. In P. J. Davies & F. A. Waldstein (Eds.), Political issues in America today: The 1990s revisited (pp. 79-95). Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.

24.

Winkler, A. M. (1984). Public opinion. In J. P. Greene (Ed.), Encyclopedia of American political history: Studies of the principal movements and ideas (pp. 1031-1041). New York: Scribner.

25.

Woodward, J. L. , & Roper, E. (1950). Political activity of American citizens. American Political Science Review, 44, 872-885.

26.

Zullow, H. M. (1994). American exceptionalism and the quadrennial peak in optimism. In A. H. Miller & B. E. Gronbeck (Eds.), Presidential campaigns and American self images (pp. 214-230). Boulder, CO: Westview.

Preference Poll Stories in the Last 2 Weeks of Campaign 2000

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References