The trend of candidate-centered campaigning has been well-documented in political science, yet communication scholars have largely ignored the sounds of this phenomenon. This study places the rhetoric of the 2000 convention acceptance addresses in perspective by examining the presence and absence of partisan and personal language in convention speeches over the past 50 years (1948 to 2000). Key findings suggest that (a) partisan terms have decreased and personal appeals have increased (somewhat) over time; (b) within these general trends, losing candidates are more likely to employ partisan and personal language than victorious candidates; and (c) although partisan terms were used divisively by Republicans during the 1980s, they have been used to unite in the 2000 campaign. A discussion of these findings submits that the rhetoric of candidate-centered campaigning is not automatic and calls for a more textured model of the rhetoric of candidate-centered campaigns than has been posited previously.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aldrich, J. (1992). Presidential campaigns in party and candidate-centered eras. In M. McCubbins, (Ed.), Under the watchful eye: Managing presidential campaigns in the television era. (pp. 59-82). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
2.
Aldrich, J. (1995). Why parties? The origin and transformation of party politics in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
Baumer, D. C. , & Gold, H. J. (1995). Party images and the American electorate. American Politics Quarterly, 23(1), 33-61.
4.
Burnham, W. D. (1970). Critical elections and the mainsprings of American politics. New York: Norton.
5.
Bush, G.H.W. (1992, August 20). Acceptance speech presented at the Republican National Convention.
6.
Bush, G. W. (2000, August 4). Acceptance Speech, Republican National Convention, Philadelphia.
7.
Bush, G. W. (2000, December 13). Acceptance address. Austin, Texas.
8.
Carroll, J. B. , Davies, P., & Richman, B. (1971). The American heritage word frequency book. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
9.
Carter, J. (1980, August 14). Acceptance Speech, Democratic National Convention.
10.
Dahl, R. (1961). Who governs?New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
11.
Dionne, E. J. (1991). Why Americans hate politics. New York: Simon & Schuster.
12.
Dryzek, J. S. , & Leonard, S. T. (1988). History and discipline in political science. American Political Science Review, 82(4), 1245-1260.
13.
Eisenhower, D. (1956, August 23). Acceptance address to the Republican National Convention
14.
Gore, A. (2000, August 18). Acceptance address to the Democratic National Convention, Los Angeles.
15.
Gore, A. (2000, December 13). Concession speech.
16.
Hart, R. P. (1985). The development of DICTION. In K. Sanderset al. (Eds.), Political communication yearbook: 1984. (pp. 97-134). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
17.
Hart, R. P. (2000a). Campaign talk: Why elections are good for us. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18.
Hart, R. P. (2000b). Redeveloping DICTION: Theoretical considerations. In M. West (Ed.), New directions in computer content analysis. New York: Ablex.
19.
Hibbing, J. R. , & Theiss-Morse, E. (1995). Congress as public enemy: Public attitudes toward American political institutions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21.
Jamieson, K. H. (1996). Packaging the presidency (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
Jarvis, S. (1997). Television coverage of presidential nominating conventions. In H. Newcomb (Ed.), Encyclopedia of television. Chicago: Fitzroy & Dearborn.
23.
Jones, C. (2000). Nonstop! The campaigning presidency and the 2000 presidential campaign. The Brookings Review, 18(1), 12-16.
24.
Kernell, S. (1997). Going public: New strategies of presidential leadership (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
25.
Lindbloom, C. (1982). The market as a prison. Journal of Politics, 44(2), 324-336.
26.
Lowi, T. (1979). The end of liberalism (2nd ed.). New York: Norton.
27.
Maisel, L. S. (1992). The platform writing process: Candidate-centered platforms in 1992. Political Science Quarterly, 108(4), 671-699.
28.
McCubbins, M. (1992). Party decline and presidential campaigns in the television age. In M. McCubbins (Ed.), Under the watchful eye: Managing presidential campaigns in the television era (pp. 9-57). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
29.
Nelson, M. (1995). Why Americans hate politics and politicians. Political Science and Politics, 28(1), 72-78.
30.
Pastor, G. W. , Stone, W. J., & Rapoport, R. B. (1999). Candidate-centered sources of party change: The case of Pat Robertson. Journal of Politics, 61(2), 423-444.
31.
Patterson, K. D. , Bice, A. A., & Pipkin, E. (1999). Political parties, candidates, and presidential campaigns: 1952-1996. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 29(1), 26-39.
32.
Patterson, T. E. (1994). Out of order. New York: Vintage.
33.
Polsby, N. (1983). Consequences of party reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34.
Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
35.
Rapoport, R. B. (1997). Partisanship change in a candidate-centered era. Journal of Politics, 59(1), 185-199.
36.
Reagan, R. (1984, August 23). Acceptance Speech, Republican National Convention.
37.
Rodgers, D. T. (1987). Contested truths: Keywords in American politics since independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38.
Schudson, M. (1998). The good citizen: A history of American civic life. New York: Free Press.
39.
Shafer, B. (1988). Bifurcated politics: Evolution and reform in the national party convention. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40.
Stevenson, A. (1952, July 26). Acceptance address to the Democratic National Convention.
41.
Stevenson, A. (1956, August 17). Acceptance address to the Democratic National Convention.
42.
Trilling, R. J. (1976). Party image and electoral behavior. New York: John Wiley.
43.
Truman, H. (1948, July 15). Acceptance address to the Democratic National Convention.
44.
Wattenberg, M. (1991). The rise of candidate-centered politics: Presidential elections of the 1980s. Boston: Harvard University Press.
45.
Wattenberg, M. (1998). The decline of American political parties, 1952-1996. Boston: Harvard University Press.
46.
Wattenberg, M. P. (1993). The decline of political partisanship in the United States: Negativity or neutrality. In E. M. Uslaner, Political parties: A reader. (pp. 108-125). Itasca, IL:F.E. Peacock.
47.
Wattenberg, M. P. & Klingemann, H. (1992). Decaying versus developing party systems: A comparison of party images in the United States and West Germany. British Journal of Political Science, 22, 131-149.
