This article adds to the debate over whether easy access to the Internet is the only outcome of community computer network projects or if there are tangible impacts to these initiatives. Building from Putnam's links between quality of life, community involvement, and social capital, the authors provide evidence as to the quality-of-life implications of the community computer network known as the Blacksburg Electronic Village (BEV). The results of the longitudinal study indicate frequent and increasing use of the BEV and the Internet for local, social-capital-building activities. However, there is no trend toward an increase in community involvement or attachment except in a subset of the population that scores high on measures of preexisting community involvement. The results offer Putnam justification for his claims about the Internet's role in social capital formation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Acker, S., & McCain, T. (2000). Living in the information age. Unpublished manuscript, Ohio State University, Columbus.
2.
Bonchak, M. (1996). From broadcast to netcast: The Internet and the flow of political information. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
3.
Capella, J. , Lee, G., & Southwell, B. (1997). The effects of news and entertainment on interpersonal trust: Political talk radio, newspapers, and television. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association, San Francisco.
4.
Cohill, A. , & Kavanaugh, A. (2000). Community networks: Lessons from Blacksburg, Virginia. Norwood, MA: Artech House.
5.
Cole, J. (2000). Surveying the digital future (University of California at Los Angeles, Center for Communication Policy) [Online]. Available: http://ccp.ucla.edu/pages/internet-report.asp
6.
Dimmick, J. , Patterson, S., & Sikand, J. (1996). Personal telephone networks: A typology and two empirical studies. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media.
7.
Frey, J. (1989). Survey research by telephone. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8.
Hampton, K. , & Wellman, B. (1999). Netville online and offline: Observing and surveying a wired suburb. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(3), 475-492.
9.
Jones, S. G. (1994). Understanding community in the information age. In S. G. Jones (Ed.), CyberSociety: Computer-mediated communication and community (pp. 10-35). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
Kohut, A. (1999). The Internet news audience goes ordinary. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
11.
Kraut, R. , Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduced social involvement and psychological well-being?American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017-1031.
12.
Neuman, R. (1991). The future of the mass audience. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Norris, P. (2000). A virtuous circle: Political communications in post-industrial democracies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14.
Patterson, S. (2000). Comparing users and non-users of community computer networks: Implications for the digital divide. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association, Acapulco, Mexico.
15.
Patterson, S. , & Kavanaugh, A. (1994). Rural users expectations of the information superhighway. Media Information Australia, 74(4), 57-61.
16.
Patterson, S. , & Kavanaugh, A. (2001). Building critical mass in community computer networks. Electronic Journal of Communication.
17.
Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18.
Putnam, R. (1995a). Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6, 67-78.
19.
Putnam, R. (1995b). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28(4), 664-684.
20.
Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
21.
Rheingold, H. (2000). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22.
Rothenbuhler, E. (1991). The process of community involvement. Communication Monographs, 58, 63-78.
23.
Ryan, A. (2000). My way [Review of the book Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community]. New York Review of Books, 67(13), 47-50.
24.
Schmitz, J. (in press). Editor's introduction. Electronic Journal of Communication.
25.
Stamm, K. (1985). Newspaper use and community ties: Toward a dynamic theory. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
26.
Tomita, T. (1980). The new electronic media and their place in the information market of the future. In A. Smith (Ed.), Newspapers and democracy: International essays on a changing medium (pp. 49-62). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27.
Turkle, S. (1997). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Touchstone.
28.
Walther, J. (1999). Communication addiction disorder: Concern over media, behavior and effects. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Boston.
29.
Wellman, B. (1997). An electronic group is virtually a social network. In S. Kiesler (Ed.), Culture of the Internet (pp. 179-205). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30.
Wellman, B. , Carrington, P., & Hall, A. (1988). Networks as personal communities. In B. Wellman & S. Berkowitz (Eds.), Social structures: A network approach (pp. 130-184). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Wellman, B. , & Gulia, M. (1999). Net surfers don't ride alone. In B. Wellman (Ed.), Networks in the global village (pp. 331-366). Boulder, CO: Westview.
32.
Wellman, B. , Salaff, J., Dimitrova, D., Garton, L., Gulia, M., & Haythornthwaite, C. (1996). Computer networks as social networks: Collaborative work, tele-work, and virtual community. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 213-239.
