U.S. agriculture is experiencing a time of turbulence. Relatively rapid and substantial changes appear likely, but the timing, nature, and extent of those changes are uncertain. Biotechnology is one, but only one, of several powerful forces shaping the structure of agriculture. This article examines concepts from strategic management and information economics that have proven useful in understanding structural change in other industries. Those concepts are used to improve our understanding of the potential relationships between biotechnology and the structure of agriculture. Doing so emphasizes that, even though forces such as biotechnology appear beyond the reach and control of individuals, their eventual structural effects will be greatly influenced by the actions of farmers, agribusiness managers, and policy makers. The analysis highlights the critically important role of information and management innovations as complementary assets, which will markedly affect biotechnology's eventual impacts on decision making and returns from innovation in the sector.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Agricultural Education and Consulting . (2000). Transportation and handling implications of biotech grains. Report to the U.S. Department of Agriculture Transportation Division. Savoy, IL: Agricultural Education and Consulting.
2.
Andrews, K. R. (1971). The concept of corporate strategy. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
3.
Ansoff, H. I. (1984). Implanting strategic management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall International.
4.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120.
5.
Bender, K. , & Westgren, R. (2001). Social construction of the market(s) for genetically modified and nonmodified crops. American Behavioral Scientist, 44(8), 1350-1370.
6.
Boehlje, M. (1999). Structural changes in the agricultural industries: How do we measure, analyze, and understand them?American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 81, 1028-1041.
7.
Casson, M. (1997). Information and organization. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
8.
Cloutier, L. M. (1999). Economic and strategic implications of coordination mechanisms in supply chains: A nonlinear and dynamic synthesis. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
9.
Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4, 386-405.
10.
Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial dynamics. Portland, OR: Productivity Press.
11.
Goldsmith, P. D. (2001). Innovation, supply chain control, and the welfare of farmers: The economics of genetically modified seeds. American Behavioral Scientist, 44(8), 1302-1326.
12.
Hayenga, M. (1998). Structural change in the biotech seed and chemical industrial complex. AgBioForum, 1(2), 43-55. Retrieved May 6, 1999, from the World Wide Web: http://www.agbioforum.missouri.edu
13.
Jacobson, R. (1992). The “Austrian” school of strategy. Academy of Management Review, 17, 782-807.
14.
Kalaitzandonakes, N. , & Bjornson, B. (1997). Vertical and horizontal coordination in the agro-biotechnology industry: Evidence and implications. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 29, 129-139.
15.
Mahoney, J. , & Pandian, J. R. (1992). The resource-baed view within the conversation of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 363-380.
16.
National Research Council . (1997). Precision agriculture in the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
17.
Nonaka, I. , & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company. New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
Optimum Quality Grains. (1999). Retrieved May 15, 1999, from the World Wide Web: http://www.optimumqualitygrains.com/
19.
Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of growth of the firm. London: Basil Blackwell.
20.
Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: Free Press.
21.
Porter, M. E. (1994). Fundamental issues in strategy: A research agenda. In R. P. Rumelt, D. E. Schendel, & D. J. Teese (Eds.), Toward a dynamic theory of strategy (pp. 423-462). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
22.
Sampler, J. L. (1997). Redefining industry structure for the information age. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 343-356.
23.
Schumpeter, J. R. (1950). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
24.
Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The age and practice of the learning organization. London: Century Business.
25.
Shapiro, C. , & Varian, H. R. (1999). Information rules. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
26.
Sonka, S. T. , & Coaldrake, K. F. (1996). Cyberfarm: What does it look like? What does it mean?American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78, 1263-1268.
27.
Sonka, S. T. , & Hudson, M. A. (1989). Why agribusiness anyway?Agribusiness, 5, 305-314.
28.
Sonka, S. T. , Schroeder, R. C., & Cunningham, C. (in press). Marketing and transportation implications of bio-engineered grains and oilseeds: A prospective analysis. Proceedings of the 2nd USDA Transportation Summit.
29.
Sonka, S. T. , Schroeder, R. C., Hofing, S. L., & Lins, D. A. (1999). Production agriculture as a knowledge creating system. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 2, 165-178.
30.
Teece, D. J. (1990). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing, and public policy. In D. J. Teece (Ed.), The competitive challenge (pp. 185-219). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing.
31.
Thompson, A. A. , & Strickland, A. J. (1990). Strategic management concepts and cases. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
32.
Tomer, J. F. (1987). Organizational capital. New York: Praeger.
33.
Westgren, R. E. , & Martin, L. J. (1997). The heterogeneity of firms: Where public policy and firm strategy collide. In L. T. Wallace & W. R. Schroeder (Eds.), Government and the food industry (pp. 399-416). London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
