More than 27% of the U.S. workforce now reports having an ability to alter their daily starting and ending times of work. Yet, provision of flexibility in the timing of work is not keeping pace with demand. Moreover, there is much disparity in access to schedule flexibility by workers' demographic, work, and job characteristics. Probit estimation finds that the probability that a worker has such flexibility is reduced by being female, non-White, and less educated. The likelihood is increased by being self-employed, in college, married, part-time, in certain occupations and industries, and working 50 or more hours per week. Flexibility is reduced for those working a standard day shift or 40-hour workweek. Workers thus sacrifice either leisure time or income to gain better access to flexibility in the scheduling of work, or they endure the costs of job mobility. Public policy should focus on delivering more flexible schedules to the excluded 73%.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Altonji, J. , & Paxson, C. (1988). Labor supply preferences, hours constraints, and hours-wage trade-offs. Journal of Labor Economics, 6(2), 254-276.
2.
Armour, S. (1999, January 15). Workplace absenteeism soars 25%, costs millions. USA Today, p. D1.
3.
Beers, T. (2000). Flexible work schedules and shift work: Replacing the 9-to-5 workday?Monthly Labor Review, 122(6), 3-10.
4.
Bell, L. (1998). Differences in work hours and hours preferences by race in the U.S.Review of Social Economy, 56(4), 481-500.
5.
Bluestone, B. , & Rose, S. (1998). Macroeconomics of work time. Review of Social Economy, 56(4), 425-441.
6.
Boden, R. (1999). Flexible working hours, family responsibilities, and female self-employment: Gender differences in self-employment selection. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 58(1), 71-83.
7.
Clarkberg, M. (1999). The time-squeeze in American families: From causes to solutions. In U.S. Department of Labor, Futurework: Trends and challenges for work in the 21st Century, Part 3: Work and family: Flexibility on the job [Online]. http://www.dol.gov/dol/asp/public/futurework/report.htm
Daniels, S. (1997). Flexible hours, telecommuting increasing. National underwriting, 101(35), 23.
10.
Duncan, G. , & Stafford, F. (1982). Do union members receive compensating wage differentials? Reply. American Economic Review, 72(4), 868-872.
11.
Dunn, L. F. (1996). Loss aversion and adaptation in the labor market: Empirical indifference functions and labor supply. Review of Economics and Statistics, 78(3), 441-450.
12.
Eastman, W. (1998). Working for position: Women, men, and managerial work hours. Industrial Relations, 37(1), 51-66.
13.
Fagan, C. (1999, February). The temporal reorganization of employment and the rhythm of household schedules. Paper presented at the Seventh International Seminar on Working Time, Gelsenkirchen, Germany.
14.
Feldman, D. (1996). The nature, antecedents, and consequences of underemployment. Journal of Management, 22(3), 385-407.
15.
Ferber, M. , & Waldfogel, J. (1998). The long-term consequences of nonstandard work. Monthly Labor Review, 121(5), 3-12.
16.
Firestein, N. (Ed.). (1998a, Summer). Labor Project for Working Families, 6(3).
17.
Firestein, N. (Ed.). (1998b, Fall). Labor Project for Working Families, 6(4).
18.
Firestein, N. (Ed.). (1999, Winter). Labor Project for Working Families, 7(1).
19.
Fisher, A. (1998). Flextime hazards and invisible dress codes. Fortune, 138(4), 220.
20.
Galinsky, E. , & Bond, J. T. (Eds.). (1998). The 1998 business work life study: A sourcebook. New York: Families and Work Institute.
21.
Galinsky, E. , Bond, J. T., & Swanberg, J. (Eds.). (1998). The National Study of the Changing Work Force 1997. New York: Families and Work Institute.
22.
George, D. (1997). Working longer hours: Pressure from the boss or from marketers?Review of Social Economy, 55(1), 33-65.
23.
Glass, J. (1995). Employer characteristics and the provision of family responsive benefits. Work and Occupations, 22(4), 380-411.
24.
Golden, L. (1996, Spring). The economics of worktime length, adjustment, and flexibility: Contributions of three competing paradigms. Review of Social Economy, 1-44.
25.
Golden, L. (1999). Projected labor market consequences of reforming the U.S. overtime hours law. In G. De Geest, J. Siegers, & R. Van den Bergh (Eds.), Law and economics and the labor market (pp. 132-156). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
26.
Golden, L. (2000). Integrating social economics into labor market analysis: Causes and consequences of hours of work and leisure as an application. In E. O'Boyle (Ed.), Teaching the social economics way Of thinking: Selected papers from the ninth world congress of social economics (423-454). Lewiston-Queenston-Lampeter, UK: Edward Mellon Press.
27.
Greenwald, J. (1998). Employers warming up to flexible schedules. Business Insurance, 32(24), 3-6.
28.
Hamermesh, D. (1996). Work days, work hours, work schedules: Evidence for the United States and Germany. Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
29.
Hamermesh, D. (1999). The timing of work over time. The Economic Journal, 109(452), 37-66.
30.
Hein, K. (1999). Finding balance. Incentive, 173, 7.
31.
HR Focus. (1999). 76(3), 4.
32.
Jacobs, J., & Gerson, K. (1998, Winter). The overworked Americans: Who? why? by how much? Review of Social Economy, 442-459.
33.
Kahn, S. , & Lang, K. (1995). The causes of hours constraints: Evidence from Canada. Canadian Journal of Economics, 28(4A), 914-928.
34.
Kalleberg, A. (1995). Part-time work and workers in the U.S.: Correlates and policy issues. Washington and Lee Law Review, 52(3), 772-798.
35.
King, A. (1978). Industrial structure, flexibility of working hours, and women's labor force participation. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 60(3), 399-407.
36.
Kush, K., & Stroh, L. (1994, Fall). Flextime: The imaginary innovation. Business Horizons, 51-55.
37.
Landers, R. , Rebitzer, J., & Taylor, L. (1996). Rat race redux: Adverse selection in the determination of work hours in law firms. American Economic Review, 86(3), 329-348.
38.
Lester, G. (1998). Careers and contingency. Stanford Law Review, 52(1), 73-145.
39.
McShulskis, E. (1997). Work and family benefits increasingly popular. HR Magazine, 42(7), 26-29.
40.
Presser, H. (1999). Toward a 24-hour economy. Science, 284, 1778-1779.
41.
Presser, H. (1995). Job, family, and gender: Determinants of nonstandard work schedules among employed Americans in 1991. Demography, 32(4), 577-598.
42.
Romano, C. (1994). What is your flexibility factor? Management Review, 9.
43.
Rottenberg, S. (1995). The regulation of work hours and its externalities defenses. Journal of Labor Research, 98-109.
44.
Schor, J. (1998). The overspent American. New York: Basic Books.
45.
Schor, J. (1994). Worktime in a contemporary context: Amending the FLSA. Chicago-Kent Law, 70(1), 157-172.
46.
Stewart, M. B. , & Swaffield, J. K. (1997). Constraints on the desired hours of work of British men. Economic Journal, 107, 520-535.
47.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (1992, August 14). Workers on flexible and shift schedules in 1991. BLS News.
48.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (1998a, March 26). Workers on flexible and shift schedules in 1997. USDL, 98-119.
49.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (1998b, March 11). Work at home in 1997. BLS News.
50.
Vincola, A. (1998). Cultural change in the work/life solution. Workforce, 77(10), 70-73.
51.
Walsh, D. J. (1999). The FLSA comp time controversy: Fostering flexibility or diminishing worker rights?Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law, 20, 74-137.
52.
The Work/Life Haves and Have-Nots . (1998). HR Focus, 75(8), S6.
53.
Work Trends: America's Attitudes About Work, Employers, and Government. (1998). John J. Heldrich Center for Workforce Development, Rutgers University, and Center for Survey Research at University of Connecticut.
54.
Work Trends: America's Attitudes About Work, Employers, and Government. (1999). John J. Heldrich Center for Workforce Development, Rutgers University, and Center for Survey Research at University of Connecticut.
