Two key components of civic environmentalism are the devolution of policy control of environmental policy from the federal government to states and localities and the increase of local citizen participation in policy decision making. Using a combination of case studies and interviews, the authors suggest that devolution of policy making and policy implementation may not increase the role of citizens. Rather, due to both the participatory mechanisms used and the larger trends in political participation in democratic societies, citizen involvement may be limited in significant ways. Although evidence is found that citizens can and do influence policy under certain circumstances, there is also cautionary evidence to suggest that this influence is not widespread and does not include representative samples of local communities. The authors conclude that for civic environmentalism to be truly civic, barriers to participation must be acknowledged and overcome.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adler, J. H. (1998). A new environmental federalism. Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy, 13(4), 55-61.
2.
Anderson, T. L. , & Hill, P. J. (1997). Environmental federalism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
3.
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35, 216-224.
4.
Bacot, A. H. , & Dawes, R. A. (1996). Responses to federal devolution: Measuring state environmental efforts. State and Local Government Review, 28, 124-135.
5.
Bacot, A. H. , & Dawes, R. A. (1997). State expenditures and policy outcomes in environmental program management. Policy Studies Journal, 25, 355-370.
6.
Barber, B. R. (1984). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley: University of California Press.
7.
Becker, M. (1993). The International Joint Commission and public participation: Past experiences, present challenges, future tasks. Natural Resources Journal, 33, 235-274.
8.
Bleiker, A. , & Bleiker, H. (1995). Citizen participation handbook for officials and other professionals serving the public (9th ed.). Monterey, CA: Institute for Participatory Management and Planning.
9.
Conlan, T. J. (1998). From new federalism to devolution: Twenty-five years of intergovernmental reform. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
10.
Donahue, J. (1997). Disunited states: What's at stake as Washington fades and the states take the lead. New York: Basic Books.
11.
Ferejohn, J. A. , & Weingast, B. A. (Eds.). (1997). New federalism: Can the states be trusted?Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.
12.
Fiorino, D. J. (1990). Citizen participation and environmental risk: A survey of institutional mechanisms. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 15, 226-243.
13.
Fiorino, D. J. (1995). Making environmental policy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
14.
Fiorino, D. J. (1996). Environmental policy and the participation gap. In W. M. Lafferty & J. Meadow-croft (Eds.), Democracy and the environment: Problems and prospects (pp. 194-212). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
15.
Freeman, A. M. (1997). Economics, incentives, and environmental regulation. In N. J. Vig & M. E. Kraft (Eds.), Environmental policy in the 1990s: Reform or reaction (3rd. ed., pp. 187-207). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
16.
John, D. (1993). Civic environmentalism: Alternatives to regulation in states and communities. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
17.
John, D. , Halley, A. A., & Fosler, R. S. (1996). Remapping federalism: The rediscovery of civic governance in the United States. In J. S. Jun & D. S. Wright (Eds.), Globalization and decentralization (pp. 84-106). Washington, DC: Georgetown Press.
18.
Kraft, M. E. , & Scheberle, D. (1998). Environmental federalism at decade's end: New approaches and strategies. Publius, 28, 131-146.
19.
Laird, F. (1993). Participatory analysis, democracy, and technological decision making. Science, Technology and Human Values, 18, 341-361.
20.
Lester, J. P. (Ed.). (1989). Environmental politics and policy: Theories and evidence (1st ed.). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
21.
Lester, J. P. (1990). A new federalism? Environmental policy in the states. In N. J. Vig & M. E. Kraft (Eds.), Environmental policy in the 1990s (pp. 59-79). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
22.
Lester, J. P. , & Lombard, E. N. (1990). The comparative analysis of state environmental policy. Natural Resources Journal, 30, 301-319.
23.
Lombard, E. N. (1993). Determinants of state air-quality management: A comparative analysis. American Review of Public Administration, 23, 57-73.
24.
Lowry, R. C. (1998). All hazardous waste politics is local. Policy Studies Journal, 24, 748-759.
25.
National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA) . (1995). Setting priorities, getting results: A new direction for the environmental protection agency. Washington, DC: National Academy of Public Administration.
26.
Portney, P. R. (1998). Counting the cost. Environment, 40(2), 14-18.
27.
Rabe, B. (1997). Power to the states: The promise and pitfalls of decentralization. In N. J. Vig & M. E. Kraft (Eds.), Environmental policy in the 1990s: Reform or reaction? (pp. 31-52). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
28.
Renew America. (1997). Environmental success index [Online]. Available: http://solstice.crest.org/sustainable/renew_america.
29.
Renn, O. , Webler, T., & Weidemann, P. (Eds.). (1995). Fairness and competence in citizen participation: Evaluating models for environmental discourse. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
30.
Ringquist, E. J. (1993). Environmental protection at the state level: Politics and progress in controlling pollution. Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
31.
Rivlin, A. (1992). Reviving the American dream: The economy, the states and the federal government. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
32.
Rosenstone, S. J. , & Hansen, J. M. (1993). Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America. New York: Macmillian.
33.
Sapat, A. (1997, July). State environmental policy innovations: A comparative state analysis of hazardous waste and groundwater protection. Paper presented at The American Society for Public Administration National Conference, Chicago.
34.
Scheberle, D. (1997). Federalism and environmental policy: Trust and the politics of implementation. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
35.
Schneider, A. L. , & Ingram, H. (1997). Policy design for democracy. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
36.
Sirianni, C., & Friedland, L. (1995). Social capital and civic innovation: Learning and capacity building from the 1960s to the 1990s [Online]. Available: http://www.cpn.org/sections/new_citizenship/theory/socialcapital_civicinnov.html
37.
Sirianni, C. , & Friedland, L. (1997). Civic innovation and American democracy. Change, 29, 14-24.
38.
Stanfield, R. L. (1995). The new federalism. National Journal, 27, 226-230.
39.
Stewart, T. R. , Dennis, R. L., & Ely, D. W. (1984). Citizen participation and judgment in policy analysis: A case study of urban air quality policy. Policy Sciences, 17, 67-87.
40.
Verba, S. , & Nie, N. H. (1972). Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41.
Verba, S. , Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42.
Yu, C. , O'Toole, L. J., Cooley, J., & Cowie, G. (1998). Policy instruments for reducing toxic releases: The effectiveness of state information and enforcement actions. Evaluation Review, 22, 571-589.
