This article addresses the moral and legal responsibility that may fairly be attributed to mid and late adolescents who commit criminal offenses and how adolescents' responsibility should affect the law's response. It offers a robust theory of responsibility that is rooted in our current moral theories and practices of blame and punishment. Next the article reviews the psychosocial and developmental literature to determine whether or to what degree mid to late adolescents are morally responsible for their conduct and whether they are less responsible than adults. Finally, the article considers the dispositional consequences implied by the theory of responsibility in general and by what we know about adolescents in particular. It concludes that neither data nor commonsense can resolve the normative issue of juvenile responsibility.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bennett, WilliamJohn, John J. DiIulio, Jr., and John P. Waters.1996. Body Count: Moral Poverty and How to Win America's War Against Crime and Drugs. New York: Simon & Schuster.
2.
Deigh, John.1995. Empathy and Universalizability. Ethics105:743-63.
3.
Dickman, Scott.1993. Impulsivity and Information Processing. In The Impulsive Client: Theory, Research and Treatment, ed. William G. McCown, Judith L. Johnson, and Myrna B. Shure.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
4.
Elliott, Delbert S.1994. Youth Violence: An Overview. Philadelphia : University of Pennsylvania, School of Social Work, Center for the Study of Youth Policy; Ft. Lauderdale, FL: Nova South Eastern University, Shepard Broad Law Center; Salt Lake City: University of Utah , Graduate School of Social Work.
5.
Feld, Barry.1999. Bad Kids: The Transformation of the Juvenile Court . New York: Oxford University Press .
6.
Grisso, Thomas.1996. Society's Retributive Response to Juvenile Violence: A Developmental Perspective. Law and Human Behavior20(June):229-47.
7.
Hart, Herbert Lionel Adolphus.1968. Punishment and Responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy of Law. New York: Oxford University Press.
8.
Hoffman, Martin L.1991. Empathy, Social Cognition, and Moral Action. In Handbook of Moral Behavior and Development, ed. William M. Kurtines and Jacob L. Gewirtz.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
9.
Levitt, Steven D.1998. Juvenile Crime and Punishment. Journal of Political Economy106(6):1156-85.
10.
Lipsey, Mark.1997. Effective Intervention for Serious Juvenile Offenders: A Synthesis of Research. Vanderbilt University. Manuscript.
11.
Lipsey, Mark W. and David B. Wilson .1998. Effective Intervention for Serious Juvenile Offenders: A Synthesis of Research. In Serious and Juvenile Offenders: Risk Factors and Successful Interventions, ed. Rolf Loeber and David P. Farrington.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
McCown, William G. and Philip A. DeSimone .1993. Impulses, Impulsivity, and Impulsive Behaviors: A Historical Review of a Contemporary Issue. In The Impulsive Client: Theory, Research and Treatment, ed. William G. McCown, Judith L. Johnson, and Myrna B. Shure.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
13.
ModelPenal Code (Proposed Official Draft). 1962. Philadelphia: American Law Institute.
14.
Morse, Stephen J.1979. Diminished Capacity: A Moral and Legal Conundrum . International Journal of Law and Psychiatry2:271-98.
15.
————. 1994. Culpability and Control. University of Pennsylvania Law Review1587-660.
16.
————. 1997. Immaturity and Irresponsibility. Criminal Law and Criminology88:15-67.
17.
————. 1998. Excusing the New Excuse Defenses: A Legal and Conceptual Review. In Crime and Justice, ed. M. Tonry. Vol. 23. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
Nozick, Robert.1993. The Nature of Rationality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19.
Parker, James D. and R. Michael Bagby .1997. Impulsivity in Adults: A Critical Review of Measurement Approaches. In Impuslivity: Theory, Assessment, and Treatment, ed. Christopher D. Webster and Margaret A. Jackson.New York: Guilford Press.
20.
Scott, Elizabeth S., N. Dickon Reppucci, and Jennifer L. Woolard .1995. Evaluating Adolescent Decision Making in Legal Contexts. Law and Human Behavior19(June):221-44.
21.
Sickmund, Melissa, Howard N. Snyder, and Eileen Poe-Yamagata .1997. Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 1997 Update on Violence. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office ofJuvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
22.
Singer, Simon I.1996. Recriminalizing Delinquency: Violent Juvenile Crime and Juvenile Justice Reform. New York: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Steinberg, Lawrence and Elizabeth Cauffman.1996. Maturity of Judgment in Adolescence: Psychosocial Factors in Adolescent Decision Making. Law and Human Behavior20(June):249-72.
24.
Torbet, Patricia McFall, Richard Gable, Hunter Hurst IV, Imogene Montgomery, Linda Szymanski, and Douglas Thomas.1996. State Responses to Serious and Violent Juvenile Crime. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
25.
Wallace, R. Jay.1994. Responsibility and the Moral Sentiments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
26.
Wolf, Susan R.1990. Freedom Within Reason. New York : Oxford University Press.
27.
Woolard, Jennifer L., N. Dickon Reppucci, and Richard G. Redding .1996. Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Studying Children's Capacities in Legal Contexts. Law and Human Behavior20(June):219-28.
28.
Zimring, Franklin E.1982. The Changing World of Adolescence. New York: Free Press.
