Despite the invisibility of emotional labor among paralegals, this dimension of work has significant consequences for the reproduction of the labor process in the large bureaucratic firm and for the psychological well-being of paralegals. These legal workers function to support and maintain the emotional stability of the lawyers for whom they work through deferential treatment and caretaking. By affirming the status of lawyers, paralegals also reproduce gender relations in the law firm. Most attorneys who receive caretaking and support are men, and the majority of the legal assistants who provide these emotional services are women. In this way, the emotional labor required of paralegals serves to reproduce the sex-segregated structure of law firms.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bellah, Robert, Richard Madsen, William Sullivan , Ann Swidler, and Steven Tipton.1985. Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
2.
Benjamin, Jessica.1989. The Bonds of Love: Psychoanalysis, Feminism and the Problem of Domanation. New York: Pantheon .
3.
Bielby, William and James Baron.1986. A Woman's Place Is with Other Women: Sex Segregation with Organizations. In Women's Work, Men's Work: Sex Segregation on the Job, ed. Barbara Reskin and Heidi Hartmann.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
4.
Burawoy, Michael.1979. Manufacturing Consent. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
5.
Chodorow, Nancy.1978. The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
Chodorow, Nancy and Susan Contratto .1982. The Fantasy of the Perfect Mother. In Rethinking the Family: Some Feminist Questions, ed. Barrie Thorne with Marilyn Yalom.New York: Longman .
7.
Connell, Robert.1987. Gender and Power: Society, the Person and Sexual Politics . Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
8.
Goffman, Erving.1956. The Nature of Deference and Demeanor. American Anthropologist58(3):473-502.
9.
Hays, Sharon.1996. The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
10.
Hochschild, Arlie Russell.1983. The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling . Berkeley: University of California Press.
11.
James, Nicky.1989. Emotional Labour: Skill and Work in the Social Regulation of Feelings. Sociological Review37(1):15-42.
12.
Johnstone, Quintin and Martin Wenglinsky.1985. Paralegals: Progress and Prospects of a Satellite Occupation . Westport, CT: Greenwood Press .
13.
Kanter, Rosabeth Moss.1977. Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.
14.
Larbalestrier, Deborah.1986. Paralegal Practice and Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Legal Assistant. 2d ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
15.
Luban, David.1988. Lawyers and Justice: An Ethical Study. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
16.
Mahler, Margaret, Fred Pine, and Anni Bergman.1975. The Psychological Birth of the Human Infant. New York: Basic Books.
17.
Menkel-Meadow, Carrie.1985. Portia in a Different Voice: Speculations on a Women's Lawyering Process. Berkeley Women'sLaw Review (Fall):39-63.
18.
Recorder (1988). 13 June.
19.
Reskin, Barbara and Patricia Roos.1990. Job Queues, Gender Queues: Explaining Women's Inroads into Male Occupations. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
20.
Shirp, A.R.1989. Paralegals Show Strength in Numbers. San Francisco Banner, 30 Aug.
21.
Steinberg, Ronnie J.1990. Social Construction of Skill: Gender, Power, and Comparable Worth. Work and Occupations17(4):449-82.
22.
Weber, Max. [1922] 1946. Bureaucracy. In From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, ed. Hans Gerth and C. Wright Mills.New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
West, Candace and Don Zimmerman.1987. Doing Gender. Gender & Society1(2):125-51.
24.
Williams, Christine.1989. Gender Differences at Work: Women and Men in Nontraditional Occupations. Berkeley: University of California Press.
25.
—, ed. 1993. Doing "Women's Work": Men in Nontraditional OccupationsNewbury Park, CA: Sage .
26.
Zimmer, Lyn.1988. Tokenism and Women in the Workplace: The Limits of a Gender-Neutral Theory. Social Problems35(1):64-77.
