This article assesses the extent to which employers participate in school-to-work partnerships and work-based learning, using data from the National Employer Survey (NES). It opens with a brief discussion of the history of the school-to-work movement and the development of the School-to-Work Opportunities Act, which seeks to improve the preparation of college- and non-college-bound students for the workforce. The authors then present a review of the literature that focuses on incentives for employer participation in these programs and obstacles to implementing the programs on a national scale. The authors then report on previous attempts to measure the number of participating employers and compare these estimates with a recent analysis of data from the NES. They find that, while 25 percent of U.S. companies participate in a school-to-work partnership and another 40 percent provide a work-based learning experience, it is not clear how substantive such involvement and experiences are.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ascher, Carol . 1994. Cooperative Education as a Strategy for School-to-Work Transition. CenterFocus (National Center for Research in Vocational Education, Berkeley, CA), no. 3.
2.
Bailey, Thomas R. 1995. Incentives for Employer Participation in School-to-Work Programs. In Learning to Work: Employer Involvement in School-to-Work Transition Programs. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
3.
Barton, Paul E. and Bryna Shore Frazer. 1980. Between Two Worlds: Youth Transition from School to Work. Vol. 2, Program from Experimentation. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration, Office of Youth Programs.
4.
Bassi, Laurie J. , Theresa Seeley, John Hillmeyer, and Jens Ludwig. 1997. Learning and Earning: An Employer's Look at School-to-Work Investments. American Society for Training and Development, Alexandria, VA. Report for the National Education Leadership Council.
5.
Bishop, John H. 1996. What We Know About Employer-Provided Training: A Review of the Literature. Working Paper #96-09, Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
6.
Cappelli, Peter . 1996. Youth Apprenticeship in Britain: Lessons for the United States. Industrial Relations35(1).
7.
Catanoso, Justin . 1997. Worker Training Key, Official Says. News and Record (Greensboro, NC), 20 Aug.
8.
Gregson, J. A.1995. The School-to-Work Movement and Youth Apprenticeship in the US: Educational Reform and Democratic Renewal?Journal of Industrial Teacher Education32(3):7-29.
9.
Hamilton, Stephen F. 1990. Apprenticeship for Adulthood: Preparing Youth for the Future. New York: Free Press.
10.
Hershey, Alan M. , Paula Hudis, Marsha Silverberg, and Joshua Haimson. 1997. Partners in Progress: Early Steps in Creating School-to-Work Systems. Mathematica Policy Research, Inc., Princeton, NJ. Executive summary.
11.
Hughes, Katherine L. 1996. Employer Motivations for Providing Work-Based Learning Placements to Students: Preliminary Results from Research in Progress. Transcript of lecture presented at a symposium of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
12.
Lehrman, R. and H. Pouncy. 1990. The Compelling Case for Youth Apprenticeships. Public Interest (Fall):62-77.
13.
Lynch, Lisa . 1992. Private Sector Training and the Earnings of Young Workers. American Economic Review82:299-312.
14.
Lynn, Irene and Joan Wills. 1995. School Lessons, Work Lessons: Recruiting and Sustaining Employer Involvement in School-to-Work Programs. EQW Working Paper #WP28. National Center on the Educational Quality of the Workforce, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
15.
National Center on Education and the Economy . 1990. America's Choice: High Skills or Low Wages!Rochester, NY: National Center on Education and the Economy.
16.
National Center on the Educational Quality of the Workforce . 1995. The Other Shoe: Education's Contribution to the Productivity of Establishments. EQW Results, #RE02. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, National Center on the Educational Quality of the Workforce.
17.
National School-to-Work Office . 1996. School-to-Work Glossary of Terms. Washington, DC: National School-to-Work Office.
18.
Olson, Lynn . 1997. The School to Work Revolution: How Employers and Educators Are Joining Forces to Prepare Tomorrow's Skilled Workforce. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
19.
Osterman, Paul . 1995. Involving Employers in School-to-Work Programs. In Learning to Work: Employer Involvement in School-to-Work Transition Programs, ed. Tom Bailey. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
20.
Resnick, Lauren B. 1987. Education and Learning to Think. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
21.
Stern, David . 1995. Employer Options for Participation in School-to-Work Programs. In Learning to Work: Employer Involvement in School-to-Work Transition Programs, ed. Tom Bailey. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
22.
U.S. Department of Education . 1997. The Condition of Education: 1997. Washington, DC: Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
23.
U.S. Department of Education and U.S. Department of Labor . 1993. School-to-Work Transition. U.S. Department of Education and U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC. Background paper.
24.
U.S. Department of Education and U.S. Department of Labor . 1996. Implementation of the School-to-Work Opportunities Act of 1994. National School-to-Work Office, Washington, DC. Report to Congress.
25.
W. T. Grant Foundation . Commission on Work, Family, and Citizenship. 1985. The Forgotten Half. Washington, DC: William T. Grant Foundation.
26.
Zemsky, Robert . 1993. What Employers Want: Employer Perspectives on Youth, the Youth Labor Market, and Prospects for a National System of Youth Apprenticeships. EQW Working Paper #WP22, National Center on the Educational Quality of the Workforce, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
