Ratings for Program Content: The Role of Research Findings

Abstract

In response to the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the television industry devised a program-rating system designed to be used with the V-chip, a device whose purpose is to permit parents to block reception of harmful programs. The industry's age-based system, which debuted in January of 1997, was criticized by researchers and child advocates for being inconsistent with parents' preferences, for failing to communicate useful information, and for making restricted programs more attractive. This article reviews the research that is relevant to these criticisms and that was used by advocacy groups to pressure the television industry to modify its ratings. The amended rating system, which includes content information in addition to age recommendations, began being used on 1 October 1997.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Austin, Bruce A. 1980. The Influence of the MPAA's Film-Rating System on Motion Picture Attendance: A Pilot Study. Journal of Psychology 106:91-99.

Bash, Alan . 1997a. Parents Crave a Clearer TV Ratings Code. USA Today, 18 Mar.

Bash, Alan . 1997b. TV Ratings May Get Some Fine Tuning. USA Today, 28 Feb.

Bushman, Brad J. and A.D. Stack . 1996. Forbidden Fruit Versus Tainted Fruit: Effects of Warning Labels on Attraction to Television Violence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 2:207-226.

Cantor, Joanne and Kristen Harrison . 1996. Ratings and Advisories for Television Programming. In National Television Violence Study, vol. 1. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Cantor, Joanne , Kristen Harrison , and Marina Krcmar . Forthcoming. Ratings and Advisories: Implications for the New Rating System for Television. In Television Violence and Public Policy, ed. James T. Hamilton . Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Cantor, Joanne , Kristen Harrison , and Amy Nathanson . 1997. Ratings and Advisories for Television Programming. In National Television Violence Study, ed. Center for Communication and Social Policy . Vol. 2. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Cantor, Joanne , Amy Nathanson , and Linda Henzl . 1997. Reasons Why Movies Received a PG Rating: 1995-96. Submitted to the Federal Communications Commission as part of comments on the television industry's rating system. 7 Apr.

Cantor, Joanne, Suzanne Stutman, and Victoria Duran. 1996. What Parents Want in a Television Rating System: Results of a National Survey. Report released by the National PTA, the Institute for Mental Health Initiatives, and the University of Wisconsin-Madison. 21 Nov. Available at www.pta.org.

10.

Center for Communication and Social Policy , ed. 1997. National Television Violence Study. Vol. 2. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

11.

Christenson, Peter . 1992. The Effects of Parental Advisory Labels on Adolescent Music Preferences. Journal of Communication 42(1):106-113.

12.

Hamilton, James T. 1994. Marketing Violence: The Impact of Labeling Violent Television Content. Paper presented at the International Conference on Violence in the Media, Oct., St. John's University, New York.

13.

Hart, Peter. 1996. Release of survey findings. 19 Dec.

14.

Herman, G. and J. P. Leyens . 1977. Rating Films on TV. Journal of Communication 27(4):48-53.

15.

Media Studies Center and Roper Organization . 1996 (December). Poll Finds Public Support for Content over Age-Based TV Rating System. Arlington, VA: Freedom Forum.

16.

Mifflin, Lawrie . 1997. New Ratings Codes for Television Get Mixed Reviews from Parents. New York Times, 22 Feb.

17.

Motion Picture Rating Directory. 1997. Encino, CA: Classification and Rating Administration.

18.

National Television Violence Study. 1996. Vol. 1. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

19.

Silver, Marc and T. Geier. 1996. Ready for Prime Time? U.S. News and World Report, 9 Sept., 54-61.

20.

Telecommunications Act of 1996. 110 Stat. 56.