Nongovernmental Organizations and Development

Abstract

Nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) are not normally good at the activities they claim as their merit, but they have virtues that are frequently not proclaimed. In particular, they rarely reach the poorest, they depend in many ways on government support, and they are often not participatory. On the other hand, they are adaptable and suited to promoting self-reliance. Participation has been used more as a slogan than a thought-out strategy. There are many exceptions to the principle that people should have a right to participate in the decisions that affect (importantly?) their lives and work. A more valid question is, Who should take what decisions at which level and in what sequence? There are many links between government and NGOs, not confined to finance. Finally, NGO projects are compared with governmental technical assistance, and the drawbacks of the latter are compared with the merits of the former.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development , Development Cooperation (Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 1994).

2. Commission on Global Governance , Our Global Neighbourhood (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995), p. 32.

3. See Peter L. Berger , Pyramids of Sacrifice (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, Anchor Books, 1976), chap. 4.

4. Roger Riddell , “Grassroots Participation and the Role of NGOs” (Background paper for the United Nations Development Programme's Human Development Report 1993, 1993), p. 108.

5. John Farrington and David Lewis with S. Satish and Aurea Miclat-Teves , eds., NGOs and the State in Asia: Rethinking Roles in Sustainable Agricultural Development (London: Routledge, 1993).

6. Ronald Dore , “Introduction,” in Community Development, ed. Ronald Dore and Zoe Mars (London: UNESCO, Croom Helm, 1981), p. 30.

7. See Amartya Sen , “Development Thinking at the Beginning of the 21st Century” (Paper for the Development Thinking and Practice Conference of the Inter-American Bank, Washington, DC, 3-5 Sept. 1996).

8. Barrington Moore , Reflections on the Causes of Human Misery (Boston: Beacon Press, 1972), p. 68.

and Judith Tendler's comments, pp. 152-154.

10.

10. Riddell , “Grassroots Participation and the Role of NGOs.”

11.

11. See Lawrence Salmen , Institutional Dimensions of Poverty Reduction, Policy, Research, and External Affairs Working Papers (Washington, DC: World Bank, 1990), p. 22.

12.

12. Dore , “Introduction,” p. 32.

13.

13. Robert Nozick , Anarchy, State and Utopia (New York: Basic Books, 1974), p. 269.

14.

14. N. H. Antia , “An Alternative Strategy for Health Care: The Mandwa Project,” Economic and Political Weekly, 21-28 Dec. 1985, pp. 2257-2260.

15.

See also Norman Uphoff's assessment of the World Bank's integrated rural development projects in Nepal, Ghana, and Mexico, “Fitting Projects to People,” in Putting People First: Sociological Variables in Rural Development, ed. Michael Cernea (New York: Oxford University Press, 1985), pp. 359-395.

16.

16. Judith Tendler , Turning Private Voluntary Organizations into Development Agencies: Questions for Evaluation, USAID Program Evaluation Discussion Paper no. 12 (Washington, DC: Agency for International Development, 1982).

17.

17. See Jehan Perera , “In Unequal Dialogue with Donors: The Experience of the Sarvodaya Shramadana Movement,” in NGOs, States and Donors: Too Close for Comfort? ed. Michael Edwards and David Hulme (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1997), chap. 10.

18.

18. Ibid., pp. 163, 166.

19.

19. Ibid., p. 281.