Empowerment of women by means of micro-credit-based income generation programs is a new orthodoxy in the development discourse. The first part of the article appraises this phenomenon in a broader historical context. It shows how women's interests are being subsumed by and subordinated to the priorities of mainstream development in ways detrimental to the radical aspirations of the NGOs' empowerment project. The second part is a critical evaluation of the current approaches used in studies on micro-credit and empowerment. These studies have mostly focused on the final outcomes of micro-enterprises rather than the process through which they are achieved. The third part, based on field research in Bangladesh, demonstrates that the widely documented successes of micro-enterprises are a result of the activities of the very institutions that are considered to be oppressive to women. In this process, NGOs contribute to further legitimization of the same institutions that their micro-enterprises desire to transform.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
See also Naila Kabeer, Reversed Realities: Gender Hierarchies in Development Thought (London: Verso, 1994).
2.
K. Jayawardana , Feminism and Nationalism in the Third World (London: Zed Books, 1988).
3.
3. R. W. Connell, “The State, Gender and Sexual Politics: Theory and Appraisal,”Theory and Society, 19(9):506-545 (1990).
4.
I. Tinker and M. Bramsen, eds., Women and World Development (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1976).
5.
cited in Kabeer, Reversed Realities, p. 25.
6.
6. Ibid.
7.
Louise Fresco , “Food Security and Women: Implications for Agricultural Research” (Paper delivered at the International Conference on Women's Role in Food Sufficiency and Food Strategies, Paris, 14-19 Jan. 1985).
8.
N. Folber , “Household Production in the Philippines: A Non-Neoclassical Approach,”Economic Development and Cultural Change, 32:303-430.
9.
9. J. Tendler, “What Happened to Poverty Alleviation?” (Paper delivered at the World Conference on Micro-Enterprises, Washington, DC, 6 June 1988).
10.
A. Bandarage , “Women in Development: Liberalism, Marxism and Marxist-Feminism,”Development and Change, 15(3):495-515 (1984).
11.
Kabeer , Reversed Realities, p. 28.
12.
Kabeer , Reversed Realities.
13.
13. Kabeer, Reversed Realities, p. 84.
14.
The significant aspect of social relations analysis is that it sees “the issue of strategic gender interests as an issue of politics rather than of better information ([gender role framework]) or more enlightened planning ([triple role framework]).”Kabeer, Reversed Realities, p. 37.
15.
15. Kabeer, Reversed Realities, p. 299.
16.
16. The difference between women's strategic and practical interests is based on the specificity of the positioning of women in the society on the basis of gender attributes. According to Molyneux, strategic interests are derived from the “analysis of their subordination and from the formulation of an alternative, more satisfactory set of arrangements than those which exist.” Practical interests are derived from “concrete conditions of women's positioning within the gender division of labor. The practical interests are usually a response to immediate perceived need. And they do not generally entail a strategic goal such as women's emancipation or gender equality.” The micro-enterprises, by responding to practical interests, are believed to be capable of meeting strategic interests, thereby transforming women's subordinate position. M. Molyneux, “Mobilization Without Emancipation: Women's Interests, State and Revolution in Nicaragua,”Feminist Studies, 11(2):232 (1992).
17.
17. Ibid.
18.
18. Srilatha Batliwala, “Meaning of Empowerment: New Concepts Form Action,” in Population Policies Reconsidered: Health Empowerment and Rights, ed. Gita Sen, Adrienne Germaine, and Lincoln Chen (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994), p. 129.
19.
19. Ibid., pp. 130-31.
20.
20. Ibid., p. 131.
21.
21. Kabeer, Reversed Realities, p. 299.
22.
22. Paulo Freire, Pedagogy of the Oppressed (New York: Seasbury Press, 1968), pp. 32-33.
23.
23. Ibid., p. 47.
24.
Transition in Rural Bangladesh (Dhaka: Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee, 1996), p. 80.
25.
25. Martha Alter Chen, A Quiet Revolution: Women in Transition in Rural Bangladesh (Dhaka: Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee, 1996), p. 80.
26.
26. Targeted Programs for the Poor During Structural Adjustment (Washington, DC: World Bank, 1988), p. 1.
27.
27. The OXFAM Poverty Report (London: OXFAM, 1995), p. 77.
28.
Joseph Stiglitz , “Incentives and Risk in Share Cropping,”Review of Economic Studies, 41:219-255 (1974).
29.
29. Karla Hoff, Avishay Braverman, and Joseph E. Stiglitz. The Economics of Rural Organization: Theory, Practice, and Policy (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993).
30.
30. J. D. Von Pishkeet al., eds., Rural Financial Markets in Developing Countries (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1983).
31.
31. Stiglitzet al., Theory of Economic Organization, p. 9.
32.
32. Avishay Braverman and Luis Guasch, “Administrative Failures in Government Credit Programs,” in The Economics of Rural Organization: Theory, Practice, and Policy, ed. Karla Hoff, Avishay Braverman, and Joseph E. Stiglitz (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993), p. 60.
33.
33. Ibid., p. 2.
34.
34. A. Escobar, “Discourse and Power in Development: Michel Foucault and the Relevance of His Work to the Third World,”Alternatives, no. 10, pp. 387-390 (1994).
35.
35. Susan Gold Mark and Jay Rosengard, Manual for Evaluating Small-Scale Enterprise Development Projects, AID Program Design and Evaluation Report no. 6 (Washington, DC: Agency for International Development, 1985).
36.
36. Stephen Devereux, “Collection of Production and Income Data: A Commentary,” in Data Needs for Food Policy and Household Surveys, ed. Joachim Von Braun and Detle Puetz (Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute, 1993), pp. 202-207.
37.
37. Carl Liedholm, Data Collection Strategies for Small Scale Industry Surveys (Bethesda, MD: Development Alternatives, 1991).
38.
38. Harold Alderman, “Obtaining Useful Data on Household Incomes from Surveys,” in Data Needs for Food Policy in Developing Countries: New Directions for Household Surveys, ed. J. Von Braun and Detle Puetz (Washington, DC: International Food Policy Institute, 1993).
39.
idem , “The Household and Intrahousehold Impact of the Grameen Bank and Similar Credit Programs in Bangladesh” (Manuscript, n.p., 1995).
40.
idem , “Household and Intrahousehold Impact.”
41.
41. Ann Marie Goetz and Rina Sen Gupta, “Who Takes Credit? Gender, Power, and Control over Loan Use in Rural Credit Programs in Bangladesh,”World Development, 24:45-63 (Jan. 1996).
42.
Cynthia Cockburn , The Local State: Management of Cities and People (London: Pluto Press, 1977).
43.
43. Goetz and Sen Gupta, “Who Takes Credit?” p. 54.
44.
44. “Grameen Bank Phase III Project: Project Completion Mission, Final Report” (Grameen Bank, 1995), pp. i-ii.
