Privatization: A New Transportation Paradigm

Abstract

A new approach to the funding, management, and operation of transportation infrastructure is emerging. “Privatization” refers to several different ways in which private sector firms, usually under some form of government supervision, assume significant responsibility for these major systems. Although the traditional U.S. model of user taxes, trust funds, centralized resource allocation, and government ownership and operation has produced reasonably good transportation infrastructure, this approach carries with it incentives for suboptimal performance—such as allocating resources on political rather than economic-value grounds, encouraging congesation at peak hours, and skimping on maintenance. The privatization techniques offer the potential of institutionalizing a better set of incentives for cost-effective performance. This article explores the use of (1) contract management and operation, (2) long-term franchises and concessions, and (3) divestiture as privatization modes that can be applied to highways and airports.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Tim Lomax , David Schrank , and Shawn Turner , The Urban Roadway Congestion Index, 1982-1992, vol. 1, Annual Report (College Station, TX: Texas Transportation Institute, 1995).

2. 1995 Status of the Nation's Surface Transportation System: Condition and Performance (Washington, DC: Department of Transportation, 1995), exhibit 10.

3. World Development Report 1994: Infrastructure for Development (Washington, DC: World Bank, 1994).

4. See, for example, C. Walker and A. J. Smith , eds., Privatized Infrastructure: The BOT Approach (London: Thomas Telford, 1995).

5. Rigas Doganis , The Airport Business (New York: Routledge, 1992).

6. William Reinhardt , “1995 International Major Projects Survey,” Public Works Financing, vol. 89 (Oct. 1995).

7. William L. Megginson , Robert C. Nash , and Matthias van Randenborgh , “The Privatization Dividend,” Viewpoint (World Bank) (Feb. 1996).

8. Robert W. Poole, Jr. , “Privatization: The Record to Date,” in Airport Finance, ed. Norman Ashford and Clifton A. Moore (New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1992).

9. Federal Aviation Administration, docket no. 28472, Apr. 1996.

10.

10. Gabriel Roth , Roads in a Market Economy (Brookfield, VT: Ashgate, 1996).

11.

11. Robert W. Poole, Jr. , Incentives for Mobility: Using Market Mechanisms to Rebuild America's Transportation Infrastructure (Los Angeles: Reason Foundation, 1989).

12.

12. Roth , Roads in a Market Economy.

13.

13. Andrew G. White , “Different Road to the Same Place,” Engineering News-Record, 5 Oct. 1992.

14.

14. Doing More with Less (Boston: Massachusetts Department of Transportation, 1994).

15.

William G. Reinhardt, “Public Owner Needs Private Flexibility,” ibid.

16.

16. Jose A. Gomez-Ibanez and John R. Meyer , Going Private: The International Experience with Transport Privatization (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1993).

17.

17. Reinhardt , “1995 Major Projects Survey.”

18.

18. Stephen Lockwood , “The Private Provision of Mobility Services in the 21st Century: How It Happened,” in Getting from Here to There: Views on Financing and the Future of Transportation (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Center for Transportation Studies, 1996).