Cleveland, Ohio, long the quintessential blue-collar, working-class American city, has been fashioned through a series of periodic transformations tightly linked to the changing rhythms of the national and global economies. After a brief review of the city's historical development, this article explores Cleveland's descent in the face of massive and traumatic deindustrialization. In the 1990s, as the midwestern economy has become thoroughly restructured around the prerequisites of post-Fordism, Cleveland has enjoyed an unexpected renaissance, including an incipient high-technology sector, producer services, and as a center of cultural consumption. A consistent theme throughout is that the details of Cleveland's experience can be understood only in reference to the city's changing competitive position; in this light, it offers a lens through which national and global tendencies conjoin in unique local contexts.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1. Harry Margulis, “Cleveland: Making the Transition from a Corporate to an Advanced Industrial City,” in The Changing Heartland: A Geography of Ohio, ed. L. Peacefull (Needham Heights, MA: Ginn Press, 1990).
2.
2. C. Miller and R. Wheeler, “Cleveland: The Making and Remaking of an American City, 1796-1993,” in Cleveland: A Metropolitan Reader, ed. W. Keating, N. Krumholz, and D. Perry (Kent, OH: Kent State University Press, 1995).
3.
3. Allen Scott, “Production System Dynamics and Metropolitan Development,”Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 72: 185-200 (1982).
4.
4. Miller and Wheeler, “Cleveland.”
5.
5. E. Miggins and M. Morgenthaler, “The Ethnic Mosaic: The Settlement of Cleveland by the New Immigrants and Migrants,” in The Birth of Modern Cleveland, 1865-1930 (Cleveland: Western Reserve Historical Society, 1988).
7. Barry Bluestone and Bennett Harrison, The Deindustrialization of America (New York: Basic Books, 1982).
8.
8. Michael Storper and Richard Walker, The Capitalist Imperative: Territory, Technology, and Industrial Growth (Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell, 1989).
9.
9. Edward Hill, “The Cleveland Economy: A Case Study of Economic Restructuring,” in Cleveland, ed. Keating, Krumholz, and Perry.
10.
10. Edward Hill and Thomas Bier, “Economic Restructuring: Earnings, Occupations, and Housing Values in Cleveland,”Economic Development Quarterly, 3: 123-144 (1989).
11.
11. Ibid.
12.
12. K. Bradbury, A. Downs, and K. Small, Urban Decline and the Future of American Cities (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1982).
13.
13. David McKee and Richard Bennett, eds., Structural Change in an Urban Industrial Region (New York: Praeger, 1987).
14.
14. Bradbury, Downs, and Small, Urban Decline.
15.
15. Norman Krumholz, Janice Cogger, and John Linner, “Make No Big Plans... Planning in Cleveland in the 1970s,” in Planning Theory in the 1980s, ed. R. Burchell and G. Sternlieb (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Center for Urban Policy Research, 1978).
16.
16. Todd Swanstrom, “Urban Populism, Fiscal Crisis, and the New Political Economy,” in Cleveland, ed. Keating, Krumholz, and Perry.
17.
17. John Logan and Harvey Molotch, Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987).
18.
18. Dennis Keating, “Cleveland: The `Comeback' City. The Politics of Redevelopment and Sports Stadiums Amidst Urban Decline,” in Reconstructing Urban Regime Theory: Regulating Urban Politics in an Urban Economy, ed. Mickey Lauria (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1997).
19.
19. Andrew Mair, Richard Florida, and Martin Kenney, “The New Geography of Automobile Production: Japanese Transplants in North America,”Economic Geography, 64: 352-373 (1988).
20.
20. Edward Hill, “Cleveland, Ohio: Manufacturing Matters, Services Strengthened, But Earnings Erode,” in Economic Restructuring of the American Midwest, ed. Richard Bingham and Randall Ebberts (Boston: Kluwer, 1990).
21.
21. Hill, “Cleveland Economy.”
22.
22. Case Western Reserve University, Weatherhead School of Management, Center for Regional Economic Issues, “REI's Profile of the Northeast Ohio Economy,” 1995, World Wide Web http://weatherhead.cwru.edu/dept/rei/neo_prof.html.
23.
23. Barney Warf and James Randall, “The U.S.-Canada Free Trade Agreement: Impacts on U.S. States and Canadian Provinces,”International Regional Science Review, 17: 99-119 (1994).
24.
Amin , Post-Fordism.
25.
Audrey Clarke and Brian Holly, “The Organization of Production in High Technology Industries: An Empirical Assessment,”Professional Geographer, 48:127-139 (1996).
26.
26. Center for Regional Economic Issues, “REI's Profile.”
27.
27. M. Magnet, “How Business Bosses Saved a Sick City,”Fortune, 27 Mar. 1989.
28.
28. Richard Goe, “Producer Services, Trade and the Social Division of Labour,”Regional Studies, 24:327-342 (1990).
29.
29. Barney Warf and Chand Wije, “The Spatial Structure of Large U.S. Law Firms,”Growth and Change, 22:157-174 (1992).
30.
Amin , Post-Fordism.
31.
31. McKee and Bennett, eds., Structural Change, p. 174.
32.
32. Hill, “Cleveland, Ohio: Manufacturing Matters.”
33.
33. Ibid.
34.
34. Cleveland City Planning Commission, Cleveland Civic Vision 2000 (Cleveland: Cleveland City Planning Commission, 1988).
35.
35. Center for Regional Economic Issues, “REI's Profile.”
36.
36. Iver Peterson, “The `Mistake' Wakes Up, Roaring,”New York Times, 10 Sept. 1995.
37.
37. A. Schorr, ed., Cleveland Development: A Dissenting View (Cleveland: Case Western University, Mandel School of Applied Science, 1991).
38.
38. Hill, “Cleveland, Ohio: Manufacturing Matters,” p. 135.
39.
39. Joel Garreau, Edge City: Life on the New Frontier (New York: Anchor Books, 1988).
40.
40. Hill and Bier, “Economic Restructuring.”
41.
41. William J. Wilson, The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987).
