Who is Protected by the ADA? Evidence from the German Experience

Abstract

Proponents of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) reason that if the disability-related barriers to employment are removed, the goal of full employment for the population with disabilities can be reached. However, some researchers have suggested that the ADA will not be the panacea hoped for by its most ardent supporters. In particular, concerns have been raised about the ability of the ADA to promote employment among the doubly disadvantaged—those with a poor education and poor job skills, on the one hand, and a disability, on the other. This article uses the experiences of the doubly disadvantaged in Germany, a nation that pursues a disability policy that includes direct intervention in the labor market on behalf of workers with disabilities, to gauge the impact of the ADA on this group. The patterns observed in Germany suggest that while the ADA may have an impact on the ability and willingness of the doubly disadvantaged to remain in the labor market, it is not likely to guarantee their long-term economic well-being.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Richard V. Burkhauser , “Beyond Stereotypes: Public Policy and the Doubly Disabled,” American Enterprise, 3(5):60-69 (1992).

2. Burkhauser , Haveman , and Wolfe , “How People with Disabilities Fare.”

John M. McNeil , Americans with Disabilities: 1991-92, Current Population Reports, Household Economic Studies P70-33 (Washington, DC: Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, 1993).

4. See Burkhauser and Daly , “Employment and Economic Well-Being.”

5. For a review of the trends in earnings levels, see Frank Levy and Richard Murnane , “U.S. Earnings Levels and Earnings Inequality: A Review of Recent Trends and Proposed Explanations,” Journal of Economic Literature, 30:1333-1381 (1992).

Dieter Sadowsksi and Bernd Frick , “The Dutch Disability Programs from a German Perspective: Public Policy and Administrative Points of View” (Paper delivered at the Foundation for International Studies on Social Security Conference on the Dutch Social Disability Insurance System, 1992).

For a fuller discussion of the GSOEP data, see Gert G. Wagner , Richard V. Burkhauser , and Friederike Behringer , “The English Language Public Use File of the German Socio-Economic Panel,” Journal of Human Resources, 28(2):429-433 (1993).

8. In both the United States and Germany, men are the primary earners in a household. Thus the economic well-being of women with disabilities is not as dependent on women's employment and earnings and, in fact, changes very little following the onset of an impairment. In labor market effort, however, men and women are similar, and, with caution, the findings for men can be generalized to women with disabilities. For a discussion of women with disabilities in the United States and Germany, see Richard V. Burkhauser and Mary C. Daly , “The Economic Consequences of Disability: A Comparison of German and American People with Disabilities,” Journal of Disabilities Policy Studies, 5(1):25-52 (1994).

idem, “The Decline in Male Labor Force Participation,”Journal of Political Economy, 88(1):117-34 (1980).

10.

10. Bound , “Self-Reported Versus Objective Measures.”

11.

11. There is no universally accepted equivalence scale, so the one used to set poverty thresholds in the United States is chosen and applied to both countries. For a discussion of the sensitivity of different equivalence scales in cross-national comparative research, see B. Buhman et al. , “Equivalence Scales, Well-Being, Inequality, and Poverty: Sensitivity Estimates Across Ten Countries Using the Luxembourg Income Study Database,” Review of Income and Wealth, 32:115-142 (1988).

12.

12. The PSID and GSOEP annual hours variables include paid vacation time. Therefore, 1820 hours per year or 35 hours per week and 52 weeks per year constitute the correct break point between full-time and part-time workers.

13.

13. Kenneth Couch , “High School Vocational Education, Apprenticeship, and Earnings: A Comparison of Germany and the United States,” Vierteljahrshefte Zur Wirtschaftsforschung, no. 3-4 (1996).

14.

14. Frick has shown that among the officially disabled population who work, more than 85 percent were assisted in their application for this status by their employer and remained on their job after being granted official disability status. It is likely that those with low levels of education also have a weak attachment to the labor market or to a specific employer. Therefore, they would be less likely to negotiate the official disability system to receive benefits and more likely to apply for general assistance. Bernd Frick , Betriebliche Schwerbehinderten-Beschäftigung und Interne Arbeitsmärute (Frankfurt: Campus, 1991).

15.

D. R. Cox , “Regression Models and Life Tables,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, series B 34, pp. 187-202 (1972).