Women in both Hong Kong and China have inherited the legacy of traditional values that severely discriminated against women compared to men. In terms of legal protections, women in mainland China enjoy an advantage. In real terms, Hong Kong women do better, as is shown in relation to education and work. Relocation of factories to Guangdong has created unemployment among older, less educated women in Hong Kong and has created opportunities for younger women in China—at some risk to their safety, as overseas Chinese businessmen ignore industrial safety regulations. There has been little renegotiation in family responsibilities, although many Hong Kong women work. Increasingly, families are employing a Filipina domestic helper, but this has only reinforced the concept of the traditional female domestic role. Relocation of Hong Kong businesses over the border has placed additional strains on marriage, as Hong Kong men establish second families in China.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Maria Jaschok , Concubines and Bondservants: The Social History of a Chinese Custom (London: Zed Press, 1988), p. 7.
2.
2. Suzanne Miers, “Mui Tsai Through the Eyes of the Victim: Janet Lim's Story of Bondage and Escape,” in Women and Chinese Patriarchy: Submission, Servitude, and Escape, ed. Maria Jaschok and Suzanne Miers (Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong Press; London: Zed Books, 1994), pp. 108-121.
3.
3. Croll, Feminism and Socialism in China, p. 28.
4.
4. Patricia B. Ebrey, “Introduction,” in Marriage and Inequality in Chinese Society, ed. Watson and Ebrey, pp. 1-24.
5.
5. Joe C. B. Leung, Family Mediation with Chinese Characteristics: A Hybrid Form of Formal and Informal Service in China, Social Welfare in China Monograph Series, no. 1 (Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong, Department of Social Work and Social Administration, 1991), p. 8.
6.
6. Carol Jones, “The New Territories Inheritance Law: Colonialization and the Elites,” in Women in Hong Kong, ed. Veronica Pearson and Benjamin K. P. Leung (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995), pp. 167-192.
7.
7. Veronica Pearson and Benjamin K. P. Leung, “Perspectives on Women's Issues in Hong Kong,” in Women in Hong Kong, ed. Pearson and Leung, pp. 1-21.
8.
8. Stanley Rosen, “Editor's Introduction,”Chinese Sociology and Anthropology, 20(1):5-12 (1987).
9.
9. David Bonavia, The Chinese: A Portrait (London: Pelican, 1982), p. 174.
10.
10. Veronica Pearson and Rose Yu, “Business and Pleasure: Aspects of the Commercial Sex Industry in Hong Kong,” in Women in Hong Kong, ed. Pearson and Leung, pp. 243-276.
11.
11. John Baueret al., “Gender Inequality in Urban China,”Modern China, 18(3):333-370 (1992).
12.
12. Beijing Review, 15 Nov. 1993.
13.
Grace C. L. Mak , “People's Republic of China,” in International Handbook of Women's Education, ed. G. P. Kelly (New York: Greenwood Press, 1989), pp. 109-133.
14.
14. Rosen, “Editor's Introduction.”
15.
15. Beijing Review, 24 Oct. 1994, p. 12.
16.
16. Rosen, “Editor's Introduction,” p. 8.
17.
17. Beijing Review, 15 Nov. 1993, p. 19.
18.
18. Thomas W. P. Wong, “Women and Work: Opportunities and Experiences,” in Women in Hong Kong, ed. Pearson and Leung, pp. 47-73.
19.
19. Po-king Choi, “Education,” in Women in Hong Kong, ed. Pearson and Leung, pp. 101-132.
20.
See also Wong, “Women and Work,” pp. 56, 64, 66.
21.
21. Linda Wong and Grace Lee, “Welfare in a Stratified Society: Shenzhen's Social Policy Challenge” (Paper delivered at the Workshop on the Pearl River Delta, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 10 Dec. 1994).
22.
See also Wong and Lee, “Welfare in a Stratified Society.”
23.
23. Anita Chen, “Behind the Made in China Label,”China Now, 150:24-27 (1994).
24.
Sunday Morning Post, 21 Nov. 1993, p. 3.
25.
25. Beijing Review, 19 May 1995, p. 19.
26.
26. China Labor Bulletin, no. 1, p. 3 (Mar. 1994).
27.
27. Xiaojiang Li, “Economic Reform and the Awakening of Chinese Women's Collective Consciousness,” in Engendering China: Women, Culture, and the State, ed. Christina K. Gilmartinet al. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994), pp. 360-384.
28.
28. Janet Salaff, “Working Daughters in the Hong Kong Chinese Family: Filial Piety, or Transformation in the Family Power Structure?”Journal of Social History, 9:439-465 (1979).
29.
29. Janet Salaff, Working Daughters in Hong Kong: Filial Piety or Power in the Family? (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981), p. 268.
30.
30. Parenthood in Contemporary Hong Kong: The Experience of Mothers (Hong Kong: Boys and Girls Clubs Association of Hong Kong, 1983), p. 10.
31.
31. Report on Mothers in Family Functioning (Hong Kong: Hong Kong Young Women's Christian Association and Shue Yan College, 1982).
32.
32. Veronica Pearson, “Women in Hong Kong,” in Social Issues in Hong Kong, ed. Benjamin K. Leung (New York: Oxford University Press, 1990), pp. 114-139.
33.
idem , eds., Indicators of Social Development: Hong Kong 1990 (Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong, Institute of Asia Pacific Studies, 1992).
34.
34. Ming-kwan Lee, “Family and Gender Issues,” in Indicators: 1990, ed. Lauet al., pp. 1-32.
35.
35. Report on Mothers, p. 23.
36.
36. David P. Weikart and Patricia P. Olmsted, eds., Families Speak: An International Study of 11 Countries (Ypsilanti, MI: High-Slope Press, 1994).
37.
37. Sylvia Opper, “Socialization Settings of Hong Kong's Pre-School Children,”Educational Research Journal, 8:48-54 (1993).
38.
38. Report on Mothers, p. 18.
39.
39. Personal communication, Hong Kong Immigration Department, 9 Sept. 1994.
40.
40. Census and Statistics Department, General Household Survey: Special Topics Report No. IX—Domestic Helpers (Hong Kong: Hong Kong Government, Nov. 1993), pp. 3-19.
41.
41. Census and Statistics Department, Monthly Digest of Statistics (Hong Kong: Hong Kong Government, Mar. 1995), pp. F3-F4.
42.
42. Ibid., p. F5.
43.
43. Ibid., p. F2.
44.
44. Pearson and Yu, “Business and Pleasure,” p. 250.
45.
45. Far East Economic Review, 20 Apr. 1995, p. 64.
46.
46. Katherine Young, “Patterns of Extramarital Affairs in Hong Kong,”Hong Kong Journal of Social Work, 28(1):5 (1994).
47.
47. Welfare Digest, 246:1 (Mar. 1995). Caritas is the social welfare arm of the Catholic Church. Caritas Hong Kong is a completely indigenous organization; that is, it is funded by Hong Kong and staffed by Hong Kong Chinese. Caritas Hong Kong is one of the largest nongovernment organizations in Hong Kong, providing social welfare services of many different kinds, including those delivered by the Family Service Centers.
48.
48. Young, “Patterns of Extramarital Affairs,” p. 1.
49.
49. South China Morning Post, 29 Jan. 1995, p. 13.
