This article argues that television has reduced the burdens of citizenship for the average American and that that reduction is dangerous. Television does all of this by overwhelming viewers with the sights and sounds of governmental life and by supersaturating them with political information. All too often, however, this tumult creates in viewers a sense of activity rather than genuine civic involvement. In addition, television constantly tells the story of specific persons in specific situations, thereby producing a kind of highly individuated, cameo politics that distracts viewers from common problems and public possibilities. Television does this work, and much more, in a highly entertaining fashion and is often genuinely informative. But television also produces an overwhelming passivity in viewers even while making them feel politically involved. The article argues that the American polity needs real, not hypothetical, involvement if it is to meet its civic obligations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1. Jack Citrin, “The Changing American Electorate,” in Politics and the Oval Office: Towards Presidential Governance, ed. Arnold J. Meltsner (San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies, 1981), pp. 34-35.
2.
2. E. J. Dionne, Jr., Why Americans Hate Politics (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1991), p. 317.
3.
3. Steven A. Peterson, Political Behavior: Patterns in Everyday Life (Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1990), pp. 63-64.
4.
4. Dionne, Why Americans Hate Politics, p. 338.
5.
5. Francis Fox Piven and Richard Cloward, Why Americans Don't Vote (New York: Pantheon, 1988), pp. 18-19.
6.
6. Ruy Teixeira, Why Americans Don't Vote: Turnout Decline in the United States (New York: Greenwood, 1987), p. 8.
7.
7. George Will, “More People Voting Isn't the Answer to Anything,”South Bend Tribune, 6 Sept. 1991.
8.
8. Piven and Cloward, Why Americans Don't Vote, p. 13.
9.
9. Paul Lazarsfeld and Robert Merton, “Mass Communication, Popular Taste, and Organized Social Action,” in Mass Communications, ed. Wilbur Schramm (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1948), pp. 492-503.
10.
10. Michael Morgan, “Television and Democracy,” in Cultural Politics in Contemporary America, ed. Ian Angus and Sut Jhally (New York: Routledge, 1989), p. 243.
11.
11. Ibid.
12.
12. S. Robert Lichter, Daniel Amundson, and Richard Noyes, The Video Campaign: Network Coverage of the 1988 Primaries (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute, 1988), p. 65.
13.
13. Christopher Hitchens, “Voting in the Passive Voice: What Polling Has Done to American Democracy,”Harpers, p. 46 (Apr. 1992).
14.
14. Michael Delli Carpini and Bruce Williams, “Is Dan Rather More Real Than E.T.? `Fictional' and `Non-fictional' Television Celebrates Earth Day” (Paper delivered at the annual convention of the International Communication Association, Dublin, Ireland, June 1990).
15.
15. Elayne Rapping, The Looking Glass World of Nonfiction TV (Boston: South End Press, 1987), pp. 154-157.
16.
16. Richard Merelman, Making Something of Ourselves: On Culture and Politics in the United States (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984), p. 113.
17.
17. Joseph Gusfield, The Culture of Public Problems: Drinking-Driving and the Symbolic Order (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981).
18.
18. Herman Gray, “Television, Black Americans, and the American Dream,”Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 6:383-384 (1989).
19.
19. W. Lance Bennett, “Marginalizing the Majority: Conditioning Public Opinion to Accept Managerial Democracy,” in Manipulating Public Opinion: Essays on Public Opinion as a Dependent Variable, ed. Michael Margolis and Gary A. Mauser (Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1989), pp. 346-347.
20.
20. Lee Wilkins and Philip Patterson, “Media Coverage of Disasters and Hazards: The Political Amplification of Risk” (Paper delivered at the annual convention of the International Communication Association, New Orleans, LA, May 1988), p. 8.
21.
21. John O'Neil, Plato's Cave: Desire, Power, and the Specular Functions of the Media (Northwood, NJ: Ablex, 1991), p. 182.
22.
22. John Dewey, The Public and Its Problems (Chicago: Gateway, 1946), p. 41.
23.
23. Barbara Hinckley, The Symbolic Presidency: How Presidents Portray Themselves (New York: Routledge, 1990), p. 56.
24.
24. For additional data on this matter, see Austin Ranney, Channels of Power: The Impact of Television on American Politics (New York: Basic Books, 1983), p. 106.
25.
25. This is Michael Robinson's summary of television's bottom-line message. See his “Public Affairs Television and the Growth of Political Malaise: The Case of `The Selling of the Pentagon,' ”American Political Science Review, 70:429 (1976).
26.
26. Jean Baudrillard, Jean Baudrillard: Selected Writings, ed. Mark Poster (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1988), p. 15.
27.
27. Michael Milburn, B. Cistuli, and M. Garr, “Survey and Experimental Studies of the Effect of Television News on Individuals' Attributions About Terrorism” (Paper delivered at the annual convention of the International Society of Political Psychology, Washington, DC, July 1990).
28.
28. Morgan, “Television and Democracy,” p. 251.
29.
29. Shanto Iyengar and Donald Kinder, News That Matters: Television and American Public Opinion (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987), p. 42.
30.
30. Susan Whalen, “The Institutionalization of Relations of Power Through Practices of Speech: A Theoretical Inquiry” (Ph.D. diss., Pennsylvania State University, 1989), pp. 160-61.
31.
31. Richard Campbell and Jimmie Reeves, “Representing the Sinister: TV News Coverage of the `Drug Problem' During the Reagan Years” (Paper delivered at the annual convention of the International Communication Association, Dublin, Ireland, June 1990), pp. 24, 28.
32.
32. Arthur Miller, Edie Goldenberg, and Lutz Ebring, “Type-Set Politics: Impact of Newspapers on Public Confidence,”American Political Science Review, 73:72 (1979).
33.
33. Iyengar and Kinder, News That Matters, pp. 125-126.
34.
34. Robert Bellah, “Populism and Individualism,”Social Policy, p. 30 (Fall 1985).
35.
35. Bhikhu Parekh, Hannah Arendt and the Search for a New Political Philosophy (London: Macmillan, 1981), pp. 16-17.
