There are a number of values that are of importance for the sustainability or degradation of the natural environment of a country. Technological development, scientific advances, the level of economic development of the country, and the specific capacity for political modernization influence the situation and development of the environment. Public opinion concerning environmental problems is a genuine factor in environmental politics and an important factor, too, in the practical solution of current and future environmental problems. The high surface ozone concentrations are considered a grave environmental problem by local communities. This article raises the question of the political capacity of local decision makers to address this problem. Generally, the local elite must be environmentally aware and must pursue adequate policy positions in order to solve current environmental problems. The more homogeneous their awareness of the environment, with its problems, and the more homogeneous their policy orientation, the greater the chances of overcoming a dangerous environmental problem. Austria serves as the subject of an empirical study of this phenomenon.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1. Graham Bennett, Dilemmas: Coping with Environmental Problems (London: Earthscan Publications, 1992).
2.
See also Robert Rohrschneider, “Citizens' Attitudes toward Environmental Issues,”Comparative Political Studies, 21(3):347-367 (1988).
3.
3. Ronald Inglehart, Kultureller Umbruch: Wertwandel in der westlichen Welt (Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag, 1989), tab. 4.6, p. 192.
4.
4. Werner Pleschberger, `` `Modernisierung' als Perspektive der österreichischen Sozialdemokratie,” in Auf dem Weg zur Staatspartei: Zu Geschichte und Politik der SPOE nach 1945, ed. P. Pelinka and G. Steger (Vienna: Verlag für Gesellschaftskritik, 1988), pp. 179-196.
5.
5. Fritz Plasser and Peter A. Ulram, “Politisch—kultureller Wandel in Österreich,” in Staatsbürger oder Untertanen? Politische Kultur Deutschlands, Österreichs und der Schweiz im Vergleich, ed. Fritz Plasser and Peter A. Ulram (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Verlag, 1991), tab. 74, p. 130.
6.
6. See the recent survey “Umweltbewußtsein in Österreich,” in SWS-Rundschau, 34(1):64 (1994).
7.
7. See “Für Mülltrennung, gegen 100/80,”a3-UmWelt, 6-7(1):75 (1990).
8.
8. Fritz Plasser and Peter Ulram, “Bruder Baum und Vater Staat: Meinungsforschung-sergebnisse über die Einstellungen zur Umweltpolitik in Österreich,” in Antworten für die Zukunft: Ökosoziale Marktwirtschaft, ed. Josef Riegler (Vienna: Verlag für Geschichte und Politik, 1990), pp. 31-42.
9.
9. Ibid., p. 42.
10.
10.Ulrich Beck, Risikogesellshaft: Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1986), pp. 82-83.
11.
See also Robert Dahl, Controlling Nuclear Weapons (Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1985).
12.
12. See Sheila Jasanoff, The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990).
13.
Ernst Forsthoff , Der Staat der Industriegesellschaft (Munich: Beck Verlag, 1971).
14.
14. Esp. Edmond Constantini and Kenneth Hanf, “Environmental Concern and Lake Tahoe: A Study of Elite Perception, Backgrounds and Attitudes,”Environment and Behavior, 4:209-242 (June 1972).
15.
15. Esp. William M. Bridgeland and Andrew J. Sofranko, “Two Assessments of Community Environmental Quality: The Mayor and the Environmental Activist,”Environment and Behavior, 10(1):89-108 (1978).
16.
16. Denton E. Morrison and Riley E. Dunlap, “Environmentalism and Elitism: A Conceptual and Empirical Analysis,”Environment and Management, 10(5):581-589 (1986).
17.
17. Constantini and Hanf, “Environmental Concern and Lake Tahoe,” pp. 209-242.
18.
18. Bridgeland and Sofranko, “Two Assessments of Community Environmental Quality,” pp. 89-108.
19.
19. For a more comprehensive overview, see Kent D. Van Liere and Riley E. Dunlap, “The Social Basis of Environmental Concern: A Review of Hypothesis, Explanations and Empirical Evidence,”Public Opinion Quarterly, 44:181-197 (1981).
20.
20. Paul Mohai, “Public Concern and Elite Involvement in Environmental-Conservation Issues,”Social Science Quarterly, 66:820-838 (1985).
21.
21. For a short overview of some American studies, see Mark E. Rushefsky, “Elites and Environmental Policy,” in Environmental Politics and Policy: Theory and Evidence, 4th ed., ed. James Lester (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1992), pp. 270 ff.
22.
22. Constantini and Hanf, “Environmental Concern and Lake Tahoe,” p. 231.
23.
23. Brent S. Steel and Dennis L. Soden, “Acid Rain Policy in Canada and the United States: Attitudes of Citizens, Environmental Activists, and Legislators,”Social Science Journal, 26(1):27-44 (1989).
24.
24. John C. Pierce and Nicholas Lovrich, Jr., “Belief Systems Concerning the Environment: The General Public, Attentive Publics, and State Legislators,”Political Behavior, 2(3):259-286 (1980).
25.
25. Michael A. Maggiotto and Ann Bowman, “Policy Orientations and Environmental Regulation: A Case Study of Florida's Legislators,”Environment and Behavior, 14(2):155-170 (1982).
26.
26. Constantini and Hanf, “Environmental Concern and Lake Tahoe,” pp. 209-242.
27.
27. Bridgeland and Sofranko, “Two Assessments of Community Environmental Quality,” pp. 89-108.
28.
28. Jonathan P. West, Stephanie J. Lee, and Richard C. Feiock, “Managing Municipal Waste: Attitudes and Opinions of Administrators and Environmentalists,”Environment and Behavior, 24(1):111-133 (1992).
29.
29. Steel and Soden, “Acid Rain Policy in Canada and the United States,” pp. 27-44.
30.
30. See Frances M. Lynn, “The Interplay of Science and Values in Assessing Environmental Risk,”Science, Technology and Human Values, 11(1):40-50 (1986).
31.
31. Willi Herbert and Tanja Häberle, “Umweltbewußtsein bei Experten und Bevölkerung” (Study, Forschungsstelle für Gesellschaftliche Entwicklungen, 1992).
32.
32. Constantini and Hanf, “Environmental Concern and Lake Tahoe,” p. 227.
33.
33. For a classical model, see Anthony Downs, “Up and Down with Ecology: The `Issue-Attention Cycle,' ”Public Interest, 28(2):38-50 (1972).
34.
34. A. C. Lloydet al., “Air Quality Management in Los Angeles: Perspectives on Past and Future Emission Control Strategies,”Journal of Air Pollution Control Analysis, 39(5):696-703 (1989).
35.
35. Viney P. Aneja, Gary T. Yoder, and S. Pal Arya, “Ozone in the Urban Southeastern United States,”Environmental Pollution, 75(1):39-44 (1992).
36.
36. Ibid., p. 39.
37.
37. Austria, Ministry for Environment, Youth and Family, ed., Photooxidantien in der Atmosphäre—Luftqualitätskriterien Ozon, 1989, p. 4.16.
38.
38. Bundesgesetz über Maßnahmen zur Abwehr der Ozonbelastung und die Information der Bevölkerung über hohe Ozonbelastungen (Ozongesetz)(BGBl. 210/1992).
39.
39. The basis for identifying the sample was the Amtskalender der Republic Österreich (1992/93) (Vienna: Herold Verlag, 1993).
40.
40. A copy of the questionnaire used in this study is available on request from the author.
41.
41. This response rate is comparable to those of other elite studies, which were reported also in this article.
