How much value do foreign languages really have in a country like the United States, where the most proficient speakers of languages other than English (LOTEs) tend to be immigrants with little influence or power and where the rich and powerful tend to have little knowledge of LOTEs? This article first discusses the role of English and LOTEs in the history of the United States and in our current position within a global community. It then presents empirical evidence of the value of LOTEs in both domestic and international business. Our findings in the business world reflect the relationship between power and LOTEs in U.S. society, with LOTEs being more valuable in ethnic and small businesses and for clerical positions than in large corporations and for managers and executives. The article concludes by suggesting that in our increasingly multilingual world, our ability to speak LOTEs would give us a greater degree of control over business decisions at all levels. But LOTEs would then have to become more widely spoken among the majority population, would have to be preserved and developed among minorities, and would have to become associated with power and profit among both Anglo-phones and ethnolinguistic minorities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Florian Coulmas , Language and Economy (Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell, 1992).
2.
2. Coulmas, Language and Economy, p. 152.
3.
Shirley Brice Heath , Language Politics in the United States, George-town University Roundtable in Languages and Linguistics (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1977), pp. 267-296.
4.
4. Joshua A. Fishman, Language Loyalty in the United States (The Hague: Mouton, 1966).
5.
5. For a discussion of these three terms, see William F. Mackey, “Las fuerzas lingüísticas y la factibilidad de las políticas del lenguaje,”Revista mexicana de sociología38:279-309 (1976).
6.
6. Robert Phillipson, Linguistic Imperialism (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992), p. 1.
7.
7. Quoted in William R. Parker, The National Interest and Foreign Languages (Cambridge: W. Hefer & Sons, 1954), p. 45.
8.
8. C. P. Harrington, Jr., “Why Teach Spanish in the Secondary Schools,”Hispania, 15:364 (1932).
9.
9. For more on this history of language teaching, see Ofelia García, From Goya Portraits to Goya Beans: Elite Traditions and Popular Streams in US Spanish Language Policy, Hispanic Issues Monograph Series, ed. Carol Klee and Francisco Ocampo (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, forthcoming).
10.
10. Theodore Huebener, Why Johnny Should Learn Foreign Languages (Philadelphia: Clinton, 1961), p. 14.
11.
11. Max Zeldner, “The Foreign Language Dropouts,”Modern Language Journal, 50:277 (1966).
12.
12. John P. Wonder, “The Bilingual Mexican-American as a Potential Teacher of Spanish,”Hispania, 48:97-99 (1965).
13.
13. Fishman, Language Loyalty in the United States.
14.
14. Significantly, the census figures show that three of every four of these LOTE speakers also speak English“well” or “very well.”
15.
15. See Erik Allardt, Implications of the Ethnic Revival in Modern Industrialized Society (Helsinki: Societas Scientiarum Fennica, 1979).
16.
For Catalan, see Kathryn A. Woolard, Double Talk: Bilingualism and the Politics of Ethnicity in Catalonia (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1989).
17.
17. Joshua A. Fishman, Robert L. Cooper, and Andrew W. Conrad, The Spread of English: The Sociology of English as an Additional Language (Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 1977), p. 330.
18.
quoted in Coulmas, Language and Economy, p. 41.
19.
19. For an analysis of how language is linked to the global system, see Yun Kyung Cha, “Effect of the Global System on Language Instruction, 1850-1986,”Sociology of Education, 64:19-32 (1991).
20.
20. For the concept of diglossia, see Joshua A. Fishman, “Bilingualism with and without Diglossia; Diglossia with and without Bilingualism,”Journal of Social Issues, 23:29-38 (1967).
21.
21. Fishman, Cooper, and Conrad, Spread of English, p. 335.
22.
22. The two studies were conducted as part of a graduate research course given by Ofelia García. More detailed findings appear in Carmen Leon, Blanca Mendez, and Nuria Velazquez, “Spanish in the Business Community of Washington Heights” (M.S. thesis, School of Education, City College of New York, May 1993); Rafael Castillo, et al., “Linguistic Diversity in Jackson Heights Business” (M.S. thesis, School of Education, City College of New York, May 1993).
23.
Snigdha Prakash , “Targeting a Niche with Ethnic Advertising,”Washington Post, 24Aug.1992.
24.
Elaine Santoro , “Hispanics Are Hot: Hispanics as Consumers,”Direct Marketing, 54:28 (1991).
25.
25. Steve Malanga, “Small Business: Holding the City Together,”Crain's New York Business, vol. 7, 20 Nov. 1991.
26.
26. The study was conducted by Lucía Clemente for her master's thesis at the School of Education, City College of New York, and was directed by Ofelia García. The sample for the study consisted of the New York Times for the first Sunday of February for the years 1970, 1972, 1978, 1980, 1986, 1988. Section nine of those editions of the New York Times was analyzed in its entirety.
27.
27. See Carol S. Fixman, The Foreign Language Needs of U.S.-Based Corporations, NFLC Occasional Papers (Washington, DC: National Foreign Language Center, 1989), p. 4.
28.
28. Mariah E. DeForest, “¿Problemas con comunicación?”Bobbin, 34:130-132 (1992).
29.
29. George P. Rimalower, “How Do You Spell Safety?”Small Business Reports, 17:11-14 (1992).
30.
Jean McEnery and Gaston Harnais , “Business Perception of Need for Preparation to Function Successfully in International Context,” in Proceedings of the Annual Eastern Michigan University Conference on Languages for Business and the Professions, ED 304882, 1988, pp. 102-117.
31.
31. For a theoretical analysis of how groups draw boundaries for their benefit, see Fredrik Barth, “Ethnic Groups and Boundaries,” in Ethnic Groups and Boundaries, ed. Fredrik Barth (Boston: Little, Brown, 1969), pp. 9-38.
32.
32. See, for example, David J. McIntyre, “When Your National Language Is Just Another Language,”Communication World, 8:18-21 (1991).
33.
This same attitude has been expressed in Fishman, Cooper, and Conrad, Spread of English, p. 29.
34.
Alan Shipman , “Talking the Same Language,”International Management, 47:68-71 (1992).
35.
35. Judy Lowe, “Language in International Business: Some Training Implications,”Journal of European Industrial Training, 6:23-25 (1982).
36.
36. Shipman, “Talking the Same Language,” p. 69.
37.
37. John W. Gould, “For Doing Business Abroad, How Much Foreign Language Proficiency Is Enough?”Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 89:26-28 (1986).
38.
38. Nigel J. Holden, “Language Learning in Japanese Corporations: The Wider Sociolinguistic Context,”Multilingua, 9:257-269 (1990).
39.
39. John Graham, “Globally Speaking,”Marketing and Media Decisions, 23:160 (1988).
40.
David A. Victor , “The Value of an Interdisciplinary BBA-BA Program in Language and International Business,” in Proceedings of the Eastern Michigan University Conference on Languages for Business and the Professions, ED 271981, 2-4May1985.
41.
41. Graham, “Globally Speaking,” p. 160.
42.
The same point is made by Fixman, “Foreign Language Needs of U.S.-Based Corporations,”The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 511:31 (Sept. 1990).
43.
43. Eugene Timpe, “Which Languages Are Going to Be of Most Importance for Business by the Year 2,000?” in Proceedings of the Annual Eastern Michigan University Conference on Languages and Communications for World Business and the Professions, ED 324940, Mar.-Apr.1989.
44.
44. Sam Ward, “USA Snapshots: Business of Foreign Languages,”USA Today, 19Oct. 1989.
45.
45. Joshua A. Fishman, Language and Ethnicity in Minority Sociolinguistic Perspective (Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters, 1989), p. 226.
46.
46. For more on dual-language programs and their recent growth in the United States, see K. J. Lindholm, Directory of Bilingual Education Programs, Monograph no. 8 (Los Angeles: University of Southern California, Center for Language Education and Research, 1987).
47.
47. Roberta Seabrook, “Foreign Languages for Business as a Liberal Art: A Rationale and Historical Perspectives (1917-1987),” in Proceedings of the Annual Eastern Michigan University Conference on Languages for Business and the Professions, ED 304882, 1988
