Sustainable Agriculture: A Twenty-First-Century System

Abstract

U.S. agriculture has been very productive during the past fifty years. A number of unexpected consequences, however, are believed to be detrimental to the long-term interests of our nation's agriculture and natural resources. In response to this issue, the Food, Agriculture, Conservation and Trade Act of 1990 mandates that the U.S. Department of Agriculture conduct research and education programs on alternative agricultural systems. These must be productive, economically viable, and environmentally sound; they must conserve natural resources, make optional use of on-farm resources, and enhance the quality of life for farmers and ranchers, members of rural communities, and society as a whole. The Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (SARE) Program has evolved as an important initiative for development and promotion of alternative agricultural practices and production systems. This article describes sustainable agriculture and its role in the development of a philosophy for identification of research, education, and policy initiatives for twenty-first-century U.S. agriculture.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. After Marty Strange , Family Farming: A New Economic Vision (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1988).

2. Robert Rodale , Our Next Frontier (Emmaus, PA: Rodale Press, 1984).

3. U.S., General Accounting Office , Sustainable Agriculture: Program Management, Accomplishments, and Opportunities, GAO/RCED-92-233, 1992.

4. Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990, Pub. L. 101-624, § 1603.

5. This subsection of the present article is abstracted from a presentation by Tom Frantzen , president of Practical Farmers of Iowa, New Hampton, to the USDA Agriculture Outlook '93 Conference, Washington, DC, 2 Dec. 1992.

6. This subsection is abstracted from a presentation by Ray Eid , consultant to the vice president, Du Pont-Ag Chemicals, Wilmington, DE, to the USDA Agriculture Outlook '93 Conference.

7. This subsection is abstracted from a presentation by Dr. Cornelia Flora , professor of rural sociology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, to the USDA Agriculture Outlook '93 Conference.

8. This section is abstracted from a presentation by Dr. John Ikerd , professor of agricultural economics, University of Missouri, Columbia, to the USDA Agriculture Outlook '93 Conference.

Jerry Wade (University of Missouri-Columbia); Jerry Dewitt (Iowa State University, Ames); Oran Hestermann (Michigan State University, East Lansing); Marty Strange (Center for Rural Affairs, Walthill, NE); Jackie Langston (Research Triangle Park, NC); Cornelia Flora (Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg); John Allen (University of Nebraska, Lincoln); Sonya Salamon (University of Illinois-Urbana); Jim McNelly (St. Cloud, MN); Fee Busby (Winrock International, Morrilton, AR); John Ikerd (University of Missouri-Columbia); Don van Dyne (University of Missouri-Columbia); and Patrick Madden (Glendale, CA).

10.

10. Wendell Berry , What Are People For? (San Francisco: North Point Press, 1990), p. 147.

11.

11. Alvin Toffler , Power Shifts (New York: Bantam Books, 1990).

12.

12. Robert B. Reich , “The Real Economy,” Atlantic Monthly, pp. 35-52 (Feb. 1991).

13.

13. Charles Stein , “Corporate Giants Try to Cut Themselves Down to Size,” News and Observer, 14 Dec. 1991.

14.

14. Reich , “Real Economy.”

15.

15. Toffler , Power Shifts.

16.

16. After Strange , Family Farming.

17.

National Science Board , Science Indicators - 1976 (Washington, DC: National Science Foundation, 1977), pp. 91-128.

18.

18. Paul B. Thompson , “Constitutional Values and the Costs of American Food,” in Proceedings of the 8th Annual Scientific Symposium (Chevy Chase, MD: Institute for Alternative Agriculture, 1991), pp. 64-74.