Consequences of the Changing Sexual Division of Labor

Abstract

The trend of women's entering parts of the labor market that were traditionally male dominated is common across most Western industrialized economies. It looks set to continue, with more role models available for girls and more financial and educational resources released that women can use to improve their circumstances. Though some prejudices will be dispelled by the performance of competent women workers, some men will seek to contain women's activities, on account of threats to their power and prestige in both home and work life. Women will still have to battle to realize the opportunities that are presented—as well as coping with, or transforming, the double burden of housework and formal employment. The ensuing conflicts are liable to intensify the critique of traditional concepts of masculinity and femininity. Suppressed grievances and insecurities are liable to come to light. This ferment has the potential to increase social justice—in family life, formal work, and more broadly—but this outcome cannot be taken for granted.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. See, for example, Dale Spender , ed., Men's Studies Modified (Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1981).

2. Angela Dale and Judith Glover , An Analysis of Women's Employment Patterns in the UK, France and the USA, Research Paper no. 75 (London: Department of Employment, 1990).

3. Shirley Dex , “Gender and the Labour Market,” in Employment in Britain, ed. D. Gallie (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988).

4. Ibid.

5. Annie Posthuma , The Internationalisation of Clerical Work, Occasional Papers no. 17 (Falmer, Brighton: Science Policy Research Unit, 1987).

6. Cf. Ursula Huws , “Telework: Projections,” Futures, 23(1):19-31 (Jan.-Feb. 1991).

See also idem , “Attachment to Work and Social Values,” in Employment in Britain, ed. Gallie .

8. Rose , “Work Ethic.”

9. Felicity Henwood and Ian Miles , “The Experience of Unemployment and the Sexual Division of Labour,” in Unemployed People, ed. D. Fryer and P. Ullah (Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1987).

10.

10. H. Moss , “Sex, Age and State as Determinants of Mother-Infant Interaction,” in Readings in Child Socialisation, ed. K. Danziger (Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1970).

11.

Peter Kelvin and Joanna E. Jarrett , Unemployment (London: Cambridge University Press, 1985).

12.

12. Lydia Morris , “Employment, the Household and Social Networks,” in Employment in Britain, ed. Gallie .

13.

13. Jeff Hearn , “Men's Sexuality at Work,” in The Sexuality of Men, ed. Andy Metcalf and Martin Humphries (London: Pluto Press, 1985).

14.

See also her excellent earlier case study, Brothers: Male Dominance and Technological Change (London: Pluto Press, 1983).

15.

and the subsequent debate in Harvard Business Review, Jan.-Feb. 1991, pp. 150-160.

16.

Ian Miles , “Time Use and Information Technology: Present and Future Developments of Private Households,” in Industrial Societies after the Stagnation of the 1970s, ed. Burkhardt Strumpel (Berlin: Walter de Guyter, 1989).

17.

17. Miles , “Time Use and Information Technology.”

18.

18. Joseph F. Coates , Jennifer Jarratt , and John B. Mahaffie , Future Work (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1990).

19.

19. George W. Brown and T. Harris , The Social Origins of Depression (London: Tavistock, 1978).