A major new proposal to refocus national efforts on heroin addicts in the criminal justice system, called Operation Tripwire, was announced on 1 October 1977. The proposal called for the universal testing of offenders in the criminal justice system for drugs, and the establishment of sustained drug-free status, confirmed by repeated drug testing, as a condition of release to the community. Despite its being grounded in a large body of solid research evidence and meeting vital social needs, Tripwire was never implemented. Today, with the introduction of the Drug Use Forecasting program, we have a more convincing indication of the enormous drug abuse problems in the criminal population. It may be time to dust off and update the original Tripwire idea. If that is to happen, it will require the convergence of many political, media, and fiscal forces, all based on research. The potential beneficiaries of such a development are many, but the odds against it remain long.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1. Robert L. DuPont, “Should Welfare Mothers Be Tested for Drugs?” in Winning the Drug War: New Challenges for the 1990s, ed. Jeffrey A. Eisenach (Washington, DC: Heritage Foundation, 1991), pp. 83-95.
2.
2. James Q. Wilson and Robert L. DuPont, “The Sick Sixties,”Atlantic Monthly, Oct. 1973, pp. 91-98.
3.
3. Robert L. DuPont, Youth and Drugs: Society's Mixed Messages, DHHS pub. no. (ADM) 90-1689 (Rockville, MD: Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Substance Abuse Prevention, 1990), pp. 1-3.
4.
4. Robert L. DuPont, “The Drug Abuse Decade,”Journal of Drug Issues, 8:173-187 (1978).
5.
idem , “A 20 Year Followup of New York Narcotic Addicts,”Archives of General Psychiatry, 20:237-241 (1973).
6.
6. William H. McGlothlin, M. Douglas Anglin, and B. D. Wilson, Narcotic Addiction and Crime (Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles, 1977).
7.
Nicholas J. Kozel and Robert L. DuPont, Criminal Charges and Drug Use Patterns of Arrestees in the District of Columbia, National Institute on Drug Abuse Technical Paper (Rockville, MD: National Clearinghouse on Drug Abuse Information, 1977).
8.
8. National Commission on Marihuana and Drug Abuse, “History of the Treatment of Opiate Dependence,” in Drug Use in America: Problem in Perspective (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1973), pp. 305-342.
9.
9. Jerome H. Jaffe, “The Swinging Pendulum: The Treatment of Drug Users in America,” in Handbook on Drug Abuse, ed. Robert L. DuPont, Avram Goldstein, and John A. O'Donnell (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1979), pp. 3-16.
10.
Robert L. DuPont and Mark H. Greene, “The Dynamics of a Heroin Addiction Epidemic,”Science, 181:716-722 (1973).
11.
11. Strategy Council on Drug Abuse, Federal Strategy for Drug Abuse and Drug Traffic Prevention 1973 (Washington, DC: Strategy Council on Drug Abuse, 1973).
12.
idem , “Heroin Addiction Treatment and Crime Reduction,”American Journal of Psychiatry, 128:856-860 (1972).
13.
13. David F. Musto, The American Disease—Origins of Narcotic Control (New York: Oxford University Press, 1987).
14.
14. McGlothlin, Anglin, and Wilson, Narcotic Addiction and Crime.
15.
15. U. S., Department of Health and Human Services, Drug Abuse and Drug Abuse Research: The Third Triennial Report to Congress from the Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, DHHS pub. no. (ADM) 91-1704 (Rockville, MD: Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1991).
16.
16. John A. O'Donnellet al., Young Men and Drugs—A Nationwide Survey, DHEW pub. no. (ADM) 76-311 (Washington, DC: Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office, 1976).
17.
17. Musto, American Disease.
18.
18. Robert L. DuPont, “Prevention of Adolescent Chemical Dependence,”Pediatric Clinics of North America, 34:1-11 (1987).
19.
19. National Commission on Marihuana and Drug Abuse, Drug Use in America.
20.
20. Robert L. DuPont, “Operation Trip-Wire: A New Proposal Focused on Criminal Heroin Addicts” (Paper delivered at the convention of the Federal Bar Association, Washington, DC, 1 Oct. 1977).
21.
William H. McGlothlin , M. Douglas Anglin, and B. D. Wilson, An Evaluation of the California Civil Addict Program (Rockville, MD: National Clearinghouse on Drug Abuse Information, 1977).
22.
idem , “Addict Careers,” in Handbook on Drug Abuse, ed. DuPont, Goldstein, and O'Donnell, pp. 325-336.
23.
23. Lee N. Robinset al., “Vietnam Veterans Three Years after Vietnam: How Our Study Changed Our View of Heroin,” in Problems of Drug Dependence, ed. L. Harris (Richmond, VA: Committee on Problems of Drug Dependence, 1977).
24.
24. Strategy Council on Drug Abuse, Federal Strategy for Drug Abuse.
25.
25. James F. Maddux, “History of the Hospital Treatment Programs, 1935-74,” in Symposium on Drug Addiction and the U. S. Public Health Service, DHHS pub. no. (ADM) 77-434, ed. W. R. Martin and H. Isbell (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1978), pp. 217-250.
26.
26. National Commission on Marihuana and Drug Abuse, Drug Use in America.
27.
27. For a friendlier review of the thinking about drugs and crime at the time of the original Tripwire proposal, see William H. McGlothlin, “Drugs and Crime,” in Handbook on Drug Abuse, ed. DuPont, Goldstein, and O'Donnell, pp. 357-364.
28.
28. Carl G. Leukefeld, “Opportunities for Enhancing Drug Abuse Treatment with Criminal Justice Authority,” in Improving Drug Abuse Treatment, DHHS pub. no. (ADM) 91-1754 ed. Roy W. Pickens, Carl G. Leukefeld, and Charles R. Schuster (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1991), pp. 328-337.
29.
29. DuPont, “Operation Trip-Wire.”
30.
30. McGlothlin, Anglin, and Wilson, Evaluation of the California Civil Addict Program.
31.
31. Carl G. Leukefeld, “The Clinical Connection: Drugs and Crime,”International Journal of the Addictions, 20(6, 7):1049-1064 (1985).
32.
David N. Nurcoet al. , “A Comparison by Ethnic Group and City of the Criminal Activities of Narcotic Addicts,”Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 174:112-116 (1986).
33.
33. Mark H. Greene and Robert L. DuPont, “The Epidemiology of Drug Abuse,”American Journal of Public Health, pt. 2, 64:1-56 (1974).
34.
34. Robert L. DuPont, “The Future of Drug Abuse Prevention,” in Handbook on Drug Abuse, ed. DuPont, Goldstein, and O'Donnell, pp. 447-452.
35.
35. Musto, American Disease.
36.
36. Robert L. DuPont, “Commentary: NIDA's Role in Applied Research,” in Drugs in the Workplace: Research and Evaluation Data, DHHS pub. no. (ADM) 91-1730 ed. Steven W. Gustet al. (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1991), 2:225-230.
37.
37. U. S., White House, Office of National Drug Control Policy, Understanding Drug Treatment (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1990).
38.
38. Robert L. DuPont and John P. McGovern, ed., “A Bridge to Recovery—An Introduction to 12-Step Programs” (Manuscript, Institute of Behavior and Health, 1991).
39.
39. Lloyd D. Johnston, Patrick M. O'Malley, and Jerald G. Bachman. Trends in Drug Use and Associated Factors among American High School Students, College Students, and Young Adults: 1975-1989 (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research, 1991), p. 144.
40.
40. “Poll Finds Most Marylanders against Drug Legalization,”CESAR Reports, 1:1 (Spring 1991).
41.
41. Strategy Council on Drug Abuse, Federal Strategy for Drug Abuse.
42.
idem, “Drugs in the American Workplace: Conflict and Opportunity, Part II: Controversies in Workplace Drug Use Prevention,” ibid., 3147-64 (1989).
43.
43. Robert L. DuPont, Getting Tough on Gateway Drugs: A Guide for the Family (Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1984).
44.
44. U. S., Department of Health and Human Services, “Mandatory Guidelines for Federal Workplace Drug Testing Programs,”Federal Register, 11 Apr. 1988, pp. 11979-11989.
45.
Eric D. Wish and Bernard A. Gropper, “Drug Testing by the Criminal Justice System: Methods, Research, and Applications,” in Drugs and Crime, ed. Michael Tonry and James Q. Wilson (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990), 13:321-391.
46.
46. Ballet al., “Criminality of Heroin Addicts.”
47.
47. McGlothlin, Anglin, and Wilson, Evaluation of the California Civil Addict Program.
48.
48. Mary A. Toborget al., Assessment of Pretrial Urine Testing in the District of Columbia (Washington, DC: Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, 1989).
49.
Douglas A. Smith , Eric D. Wish, and G. R. Jarjoura, “Drug Use and Pretrial Misconduct in New York City,”Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 5:101-126 (1989).
50.
50. Eric D. Wish, Mary A. Toborg, and John P. Bellassai, “Identifying Drug Users and Monitoring Them during Conditional Release” (National Institute of Justice Briefing Paper, Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, 1988).
51.
51. Eric D. Wish, “Cocaine Use in Arrestees in New York City, Washington, D. C.,” in Report to the President and the Attorney General: America's Habit: Drug Abuse, Drug Trafficking and Organized Crime (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1986).
52.
52. U. S., White House, Office of National Drug Control Policy, National Drug Control Strategy (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1990).
53.
53. See Tom Mieczkowski, “New Approaches in Drug Testing: A Review of Hair Analysis,” this issue of The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.
54.
54. Vaillant, “20 Year Followup of New York Narcotic Addicts.”
